Transistor count

Jump to content

Main menu

Main menu

move to sidebarhide

Navigation

• Main page
• Contents
• Current events
• Random article
• About Wikipedia
• Contact us

Contribute

• Help
• Learn to edit
• Community portal
• Recent changes
• Upload file
• Special pages

Search

Search

Appearance

• Donate
• Create account
• Log in

Personal tools

• Donate
• Create account
• Log in

Contents

move to sidebarhide

• (Top)
• 1Records
• 2Transistor count
  Toggle Transistor count subsection
  • 2.1Microprocessors
  • 2.2GPUs
  • 2.3FPGA
  • 2.4Memory
  • 2.5Transistor computers
  • 2.6Logic functions
  • 2.7Parallel systems
  • 2.8Other devices
• 3Transistor density
  Toggle Transistor density subsection
  • 3.1MOSFET nodes
• 4Gate count
• 5See also
• 6Notes
• 7References
• 8External links

Toggle the table of contents

7 languages

• Català
• فارسی
• 한국어
• Nederlands
• Türkçe
• 粵語
• 中文

Edit links

• Article
• Talk

English

• Read
• Edit
• View history

Tools

Tools

move to sidebarhide

Actions

• Read
• Edit
• View history

General

• What links here
• Related changes
• Upload file
• Permanent link
• Page information
• Cite this page
• Get shortened URL
• Download QR code

Print/export

• Download as PDF
• Printable version

In other projects

• Wikidata item

Appearance

move to sidebarhide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Transistors density)

Number of transistors in a device

The transistor count is the number of transistors in an electronic device (typically on a single substrate or silicon die). It is the most common measure of integrated circuit complexity (although the majority of transistors in modern microprocessors are contained in cache memories, which consist mostly of the same memory cell circuits replicated many times). The rate at which MOS transistor counts have increased generally follows Moore's law, which observes that transistor count doubles approximately every two years. However, being directly proportional to the area of a die, transistor count does not represent how advanced the corresponding manufacturing technology is. A better indication of this is transistor density which is the ratio of a semiconductor's transistor count to its die area.

Records

[edit]

As of 2023^[update], the highest transistor count in flash memory is Micron's 2 terabyte (3D-stacked) 16-die, 232-layer V-NAND flash memory chip, with 5.3 trillion floating-gate MOSFETs (3 bits per transistor).

The highest transistor count in a single chip processor as of 2020^[update] is that of the deep learning processor Wafer Scale Engine 2 by Cerebras. It has 2.6 trillion MOSFETs in 84 exposed fields (dies) on a wafer, manufactured using TSMC's 7 nm FinFET process.^{[1][2][3][4][5]}

As of 2024^[update], the GPU with the highest transistor count is Nvidia's Blackwell-based B100 accelerator, built on TSMC's custom 4NP process node and totaling 208 billion MOSFETs.

The highest transistor count in a consumer microprocessor as of March 2025^[update] is 184 billion transistors, in Apple's ARM-based dual-die M3 Ultra SoC, which is fabricated using TSMC's 3 nm semiconductor manufacturing process.^{[citation needed]}

Year	Component	Name	Number of MOSFETs (in trillions)	Remarks
2022	Flash memory	Micron's V-NAND module	5.3	stacked package of sixteen 232-layer 3D NAND dies
2020	any processor	Wafer Scale Engine 2	2.6	wafer-scale design of 84 exposed fields (dies)
2024	GPU	Nvidia B100	0.208	Uses two reticle limit dies, with 104 billion transistors each, joined and acting as a single large monolithic piece of silicon
2025	Microprocessor (consumer)	Apple M3 Ultra	0.184	SoC using two dies joined with a high-speed bridge
2020	DLP	Colossus Mk2 GC200	0.059	An IPU[a] (Intelligence Processing Unit) in contrast to CPU and GPU

In terms of computer systems that consist of numerous integrated circuits, the supercomputer with the highest transistor count as of 2016^[update] was the Chinese-designed Sunway TaihuLight, which has for all CPUs/nodes combined "about 400 trillion transistors in the processing part of the hardware" and "the DRAM includes about 12 quadrillion transistors, and that's about 97 percent of all the transistors."^[6] To compare, the smallest computer, as of 2018^[update] dwarfed by a grain of rice, had on the order of 100,000 transistors. Early experimental solid-state computers had as few as 130 transistors but used large amounts of diode logic. The first carbon nanotube computer had 178 transistors and was a 1-bit one-instruction set computer, while a later one is 16-bit (its instruction set is 32-bit RISC-V though).

Ionic transistor chips ("water-based" analog limited processor), have up to hundreds of such transistors.^[7]

Estimates of the total numbers of transistors manufactured:

• Up to 2014: 2.9×10²¹
• Up to 2018: 1.3×10^22[8][9]

Transistor count

[edit]

Plot of MOS transistor counts for microprocessors against dates of in­tro­duction. The curve shows counts doubling every two years, per Moore's law.

Microprocessors

[edit]

See also: Microprocessor chronology and Microcontroller

A microprocessor incorporates the functions of a computer's central processing unit on a single integrated circuit. It is a multi-purpose, programmable device that accepts digital data as input, processes it according to instructions stored in its memory, and provides results as output.

The development of MOS integrated circuit technology in the 1960s led to the development of the first microprocessors.^[10] The 20-bit MP944, developed by Garrett AiResearch for the U.S. Navy's F-14 Tomcat fighter in 1970, is considered by its designer Ray Holt to be the first microprocessor.^[11] It was a multi-chip microprocessor, fabricated on six MOS chips. However, it was classified by the Navy until 1998. The 4-bit Intel 4004, released in 1971, was the first single-chip microprocessor.

Modern microprocessors typically include on-chip cache memories. The number of transistors used for these cache memories typically far exceeds the number of transistors used to implement the logic of the microprocessor (that is, excluding the cache). For example, the last DEC Alpha chip uses 90% of its transistors for cache.^[12]

Processor	Transistor count	Year	Designer	Process (nm)	Area (mm2)	Transistor density (tr./mm2)
MP944 (20-bit, 6-chip, 28 chips total)	74,442 (5,360 excl. ROM & RAM)[13][14]	1970[11][b]	Garrett AiResearch	?	?	?
Intel 4004 (4-bit, 16-pin)	2,250	1971	Intel	10,000 nm	12 mm2	188
TMX 1795 (8-bit, 24-pin)	3,078[15]	1971	Texas Instruments	?	30.64 mm2	100.5
Intel 8008 (8-bit, 18-pin)	3,500	1972	Intel	10,000 nm	14 mm2	250
NEC μCOM-4 (4-bit, 42-pin)	2,500[16][17]	1973	NEC	7,500 nm[18]	?	?
Toshiba TLCS-12 (12-bit)	11,000+[19]	1973	Toshiba	6,000 nm	32.45 mm2	340+
Intel 4040 (4-bit, 16-pin)	3,000	1974	Intel	10,000 nm	12 mm2	250
Motorola 6800 (8-bit, 40-pin)	4,100	1974	Motorola	6,000 nm	16 mm2	256
Intel 8080 (8-bit, 40-pin)	6,000	1974	Intel	6,000 nm	20 mm2	300
TMS 1000 (4-bit, 28-pin)	8,000[c]	1974[20]	Texas Instruments	8,000 nm	11 mm2	730
HP Nanoprocessor (8-bit, 40-pin)	4639[d][21]	1974	Hewlett-Packard	?	19 mm2	?
MOS Technology 6502 (8-bit, 40-pin)	4,528[e][22]	1975	MOS Technology	8,000 nm	21 mm2	216
Intersil IM6100 (12-bit, 40-pin; clone of PDP-8)	4,000	1975	Intersil	?	?	?
CDP 1801 (8-bit, 2-chip, 40-pin)	5,000	1975	RCA	?	?	?
RCA 1802 (8-bit, 40-pin)	5,000	1976	RCA	5,000 nm	27 mm2	185
Zilog Z80 (8-bit, 4-bit ALU, 40-pin)	8,500[f]	1976	Zilog	4,000 nm	18 mm2	470
Intel 8085 (8-bit, 40-pin)	6,500	1976	Intel	3,000 nm	20 mm2	325
TMS9900 (16-bit)	8,000	1976	Texas Instruments	?	?	?
Bellmac-8 (8-bit)	7,000	1977	Bell Labs	5,000 nm	?	?
Motorola 6809 (8-bit with some 16-bit features, 40-pin)	9,000	1978	Motorola	5,000 nm	21 mm2	430
Intel 8086 (16-bit, 40-pin)	29,000[23]	1978	Intel	3,000 nm	33 mm2	880
Zilog Z8000 (16-bit)	17,500[24]	1979	Zilog	5,000-6,000 nm (design rules)	39.31 mm2 (238x256 mil2)	445
Intel 8088 (16-bit, 8-bit data bus)	29,000	1979	Intel	3,000 nm	33 mm2	880
Motorola 68000 (16/32-bit, 32-bit registers, 16-bit ALU)	68,000[25]	1979	Motorola	3,500 nm	44 mm2	1,550
Intel 8051 (8-bit, 40-pin)	50,000	1980	Intel	?	?	?
WDC 65C02	11,500[26]	1981	WDC	3,000 nm	6 mm2	1,920
ROMP (32-bit)	45,000	1981	IBM	2,000 nm	58.52 mm2	770
Intel 80186 (16-bit, 68-pin)	55,000	1982	Intel	3,000 nm	60 mm2	920
Intel 80286 (16-bit, 68-pin)	134,000	1982	Intel	1,500 nm	49 mm2	2,730
WDC 65C816 (8/16-bit)	22,000[27]	1983	WDC	3,000 nm[28]	9 mm2	2,400
NEC V20	63,000	1984	NEC	?	?	?
Motorola 68020 (32-bit; 114 pins used)	190,000[29]	1984	Motorola	2,000 nm	85 mm2	2,200
Intel 80386 (32-bit, 132-pin; no cache)	275,000	1985	Intel	1,500 nm	104 mm2	2,640
ARM 1 (32-bit; no cache)	25,000[29]	1985	Acorn	3,000 nm	50 mm2	500
Novix NC4016 (16-bit)	16,000[30]	1985[31]	Harris Corporation	3,000 nm[32]	?	?
SPARC MB86900 (32-bit; no cache)	110,000[33]	1986	Fujitsu	1,200 nm	?	?
NEC V60[34] (32-bit; no cache)	375,000	1986	NEC	1,500 nm	?	?
ARM 2 (32-bit, 84-pin; no cache)	27,000[35][29]	1986	Acorn	2,000 nm	30.25 mm2	890
Z80000 (32-bit; very small cache)	91,000	1986	Zilog	?	?	?
NEC V70[34] (32-bit; no cache)	385,000	1987	NEC	1,500 nm	?	?
Hitachi Gmicro/200[36]	730,000	1987	Hitachi	1,000 nm	?	?
Motorola 68030 (32-bit, very small caches)	273,000	1987	Motorola	800 nm	102 mm2	2,680
TI Explorer's 32-bit Lisp machine chip	553,000[37]	1987	Texas Instruments	2,000 nm[38]	?	?
DEC WRL MultiTitan	180,000[39]	1988	DEC WRL	1,500 nm	61 mm2	2,950
Intel i960 (32-bit, 33-bit memory subsystem, no cache)	250,000[40]	1988	Intel	1,500 nm[41]	?	?
Intel i960CA (32-bit, cache)	600,000[41]	1989	Intel	800 nm	143 mm2	4,200
Intel i860 (32/64-bit, 128-bit SIMD, cache, VLIW)	1,000,000[42]	1989	Intel	?	?	?
Intel 80486 (32-bit, 8 KB cache)	1,180,235	1989	Intel	1,000 nm	173 mm2	6,822
ARM 3 (32-bit, 4 KB cache)	310,000	1989	Acorn	1,500 nm	87 mm2	3,600
POWER1 (9-chip module, 72 kB of cache)	6,900,000[43]	1990	IBM	1,000 nm	1,283.61 mm2	5,375
Motorola 68040 (32-bit, 8 KB caches)	1,200,000	1990	Motorola	650 nm	152 mm2	7,900
R4000 (64-bit, 16 KB of caches)	1,350,000	1991	MIPS	1,000 nm	213 mm2	6,340
ARM 6 (32-bit, no cache for this 60 variant)	35,000	1991	ARM	800 nm	?	?
Hitachi SH-1 (32-bit, no cache)	600,000[44]	1992[45]	Hitachi	800 nm	100 mm2	6,000
Intel i960CF (32-bit, cache)	900,000[41]	1992	Intel	?	125 mm2	7,200
Alpha 21064 (64-bit, 290-pin; 16 KB of caches)	1,680,000	1992	DEC	750 nm	233.52 mm2	7,190
Hitachi HARP-1 (32-bit, cache)	2,800,000[46]	1993	Hitachi	500 nm	267 mm2	10,500
Pentium (32-bit, 16 KB of caches)	3,100,000	1993	Intel	800 nm	294 mm2	10,500
POWER2 (8-chip module, 288 kB of cache)	23,037,000[47]	1993	IBM	720 nm	1,217.39 mm2	18,923
ARM700 (32-bit; 8 KB cache)	578,977[48]	1994	ARM	700 nm	68.51 mm2	8,451
MuP21 (21-bit,[49] 40-pin; includes video)	7,000[50]	1994	Offete Enterprises	1,200 nm	?	?
Motorola 68060 (32-bit, 16 KB of caches)	2,500,000	1994	Motorola	600 nm	218 mm2	11,500
PowerPC 601 (32-bit, 32 KB of caches)	2,800,000[51]	1994	Apple, IBM, Motorola	600 nm	121 mm2	23,000
PowerPC 603 (32-bit, 16 KB of caches)	1,600,000[52]	1994	Apple, IBM, Motorola	500 nm	84.76 mm2	18,900
PowerPC 603e (32-bit, 32 KB of caches)	2,600,000[53]	1995	Apple, IBM, Motorola	500 nm	98 mm2	26,500
Alpha 21164 EV5 (64-bit, 112 kB cache)	9,300,000[54]	1995	DEC	500 nm	298.65 mm2	31,140
SA-110 (32-bit, 32 KB of caches)	2,500,000[29]	1995	Acorn, DEC, Apple	350 nm	50 mm2	50,000
Pentium Pro (32-bit, 16 KB of caches;[55] L2 cache on-package, but on separate die)	5,500,000[56]	1995	Intel	500 nm	307 mm2	18,000
PA-8000 64-bit, no cache	3,800,000[57]	1995	HP	500 nm	337.69 mm2	11,300
Alpha 21164A EV56 (64-bit, 112 kB cache)	9,660,000[58]	1996	DEC	350 nm	208.8 mm2	46,260
AMD K5 (32-bit, caches)	4,300,000	1996	AMD	500 nm	251 mm2	17,000
Pentium II Klamath (32-bit, 64-bit SIMD, caches)	7,500,000	1997	Intel	350 nm	195 mm2	39,000
AMD K6 (32-bit, caches)	8,800,000	1997	AMD	350 nm	162 mm2	54,000
F21 (21-bit; includes e.g. video)	15,000	1997[50]	Offete Enterprises	?	?	?
AVR (8-bit, 40-pin; w/memory)	140,000 (48,000 excl. memory[59])	1997	Nordic VLSI/Atmel	?	?	?
Pentium II Deschutes (32-bit, large cache)	7,500,000	1998	Intel	250 nm	113 mm2	66,000
Alpha 21264 EV6 (64-bit)	15,200,000[60]	1998	DEC	350 nm	313.96 mm2	48,400
Alpha 21164PC PCA57 (64-bit, 48 kB cache)	5,700,000	1998	Samsung	280 nm	100.5 mm2	56,700
Hitachi SH-4 (32-bit, caches)[61]	3,200,000[62]	1998	Hitachi	250 nm	57.76 mm2	55,400
ARM 9TDMI (32-bit, no cache)	111,000[29]	1999	Acorn	350 nm	4.8 mm2	23,100
Pentium III Katmai (32-bit, 128-bit SIMD, caches)	9,500,000	1999	Intel	250 nm	128 mm2	74,000
Emotion Engine (64-bit, 128-bit SIMD, cache)	10,500,000[63] – 13,500,000[64]	1999	Sony, Toshiba	250 nm	239.7 mm2[63]	43,800 – 56,300
Pentium II Mobile Dixon (32-bit, caches)	27,400,000	1999	Intel	180 nm	180 mm2	152,000
AMD K6-III (32-bit, caches)	21,300,000	1999	AMD	250 nm	118 mm2	181,000
AMD K7 (32-bit, caches)	22,000,000	1999	AMD	250 nm	184 mm2	120,000
Gekko (32-bit, large cache)	21,000,000[65]	2000	IBM, Nintendo	180 nm	43 mm2	490,000 (check)
Pentium III Coppermine (32-bit, large cache)	21,000,000	2000	Intel	180 nm	80 mm2	263,000
Pentium 4 Willamette (32-bit, large cache)	42,000,000	2000	Intel	180 nm	217 mm2	194,000
SPARC64 V (64-bit, large cache)	191,000,000[66]	2001	Fujitsu	130 nm[67]	290 mm2	659,000
Pentium III Tualatin (32-bit, large cache)	45,000,000	2001	Intel	130 nm	81 mm2	556,000
Pentium 4 Northwood (32-bit, large cache)	55,000,000	2002	Intel	130 nm	145 mm2	379,000
Itanium 2 McKinley (64-bit, large cache)	220,000,000	2002	Intel	180 nm	421 mm2	523,000
Alpha 21364 (64-bit, 946-pin, SIMD, very large caches)	152,000,000[12]	2003	DEC	180 nm	397 mm2	383,000
AMD K7 Barton (32-bit, large cache)	54,300,000	2003	AMD	130 nm	101 mm2	538,000
AMD K8 (64-bit, large cache)	105,900,000	2003	AMD	130 nm	193 mm2	548,700
Pentium M Banias (32-bit)	77,000,000[68]	2003	Intel	130 nm	83 mm2	928,000
Itanium 2 Madison 6M (64-bit)	410,000,000	2003	Intel	130 nm	374 mm2	1,096,000
PlayStation 2 single chip (CPU + GPU)	53,500,000[69]	2003[70]	Sony, Toshiba	90 nm[71] 130 nm[72][73]	86 mm2	622,100
Pentium 4 Prescott (32-bit, large cache)	112,000,000	2004	Intel	90 nm	110 mm2	1,018,000
Pentium M Dothan (32-bit)	144,000,000[74]	2004	Intel	90 nm	87 mm2	1,655,000
SPARC64 V+ (64-bit, large cache)	400,000,000[75]	2004	Fujitsu	90 nm	294 mm2	1,360,000
Itanium 2 (64-bit;9 MB cache)	592,000,000	2004	Intel	130 nm	432 mm2	1,370,000
Pentium 4 Prescott-2M (32-bit, large cache)	169,000,000	2005	Intel	90 nm	143 mm2	1,182,000
Pentium D Smithfield (64-bit, large cache)	228,000,000	2005	Intel	90 nm	206 mm2	1,107,000
Xenon (64-bit, 128-bit SIMD, large cache)	165,000,000	2005	IBM	90 nm	?	?
Cell (32-bit, cache)	250,000,000[76]	2005	Sony, IBM, Toshiba	90 nm	221 mm2	1,131,000
Pentium 4 Cedar Mill (32-bit, large cache)	184,000,000	2006	Intel	65 nm	90 mm2	2,044,000
Pentium D Presler (64-bit, large cache)	362,000,000 [77]	2006	Intel	65 nm	162 mm2	2,235,000
Core 2 Duo Conroe (dual-core 64-bit, large caches)	291,000,000	2006	Intel	65 nm	143 mm2	2,035,000
Dual-core Itanium 2 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,700,000,000[78]	2006	Intel	90 nm	596 mm2	2,852,000
AMD K10 quad-core 2M L3 (64-bit, large caches)	463,000,000[79]	2007	AMD	65 nm	283 mm2	1,636,000
ARM Cortex-A9 (32-bit, (optional) SIMD, caches)	26,000,000[80]	2007	ARM	45 nm	31 mm2	839,000
Core 2 Duo Wolfdale (dual-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	411,000,000	2007	Intel	45 nm	107 mm2	3,841,000
POWER6 (64-bit, large caches)	789,000,000	2007	IBM	65 nm	341 mm2	2,314,000
Core 2 Duo Allendale (dual-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	169,000,000	2007	Intel	65 nm	111 mm2	1,523,000
Uniphier	250,000,000[81]	2007	Matsushita	45 nm	?	?
SPARC64 VI (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	540,000,000	2007[82]	Fujitsu	90 nm	421 mm2	1,283,000
Core 2 Duo Wolfdale 3M (dual-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	230,000,000	2008	Intel	45 nm	83 mm2	2,771,000
Core i7 (quad-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	731,000,000	2008	Intel	45 nm	263 mm2	2,779,000
AMD K10 quad-core 6M L3 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	758,000,000[79]	2008	AMD	45 nm	258 mm2	2,938,000
Atom (32-bit, large cache)	47,000,000	2008	Intel	45 nm	24 mm2	1,958,000
SPARC64 VII (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	600,000,000	2008[83]	Fujitsu	65 nm	445 mm2	1,348,000
Six-core Xeon 7400 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,900,000,000	2008	Intel	45 nm	503 mm2	3,777,000
Six-core Opteron 2400 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	904,000,000	2009	AMD	45 nm	346 mm2	2,613,000
SPARC64 VIIIfx (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	760,000,000[84]	2009	Fujitsu	45 nm	513 mm2	1,481,000
Atom (Pineview) 64-bit, 1-core, 512 kB L2 cache	123,000,000[85]	2010	Intel	45 nm	66 mm2	1,864,000
Atom (Pineview) 64-bit, 2-core, 1 MB L2 cache	176,000,000[86]	2010	Intel	45 nm	87 mm2	2,023,000
SPARC T3 (16-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,000,000,000[87]	2010	Sun/Oracle	40 nm	377 mm2	2,653,000
Six-core Core i7 (Gulftown)	1,170,000,000	2010	Intel	32 nm	240 mm2	4,875,000
POWER7 32M L3 (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,200,000,000	2010	IBM	45 nm	567 mm2	2,116,000
Quad-core z196[88] (64-bit, very large caches)	1,400,000,000	2010	IBM	45 nm	512 mm2	2,734,000
Quad-core Itanium Tukwila (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	2,000,000,000[89]	2010	Intel	65 nm	699 mm2	2,861,000
Xeon Nehalem-EX (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	2,300,000,000[90]	2010	Intel	45 nm	684 mm2	3,363,000
SPARC64 IXfx (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,870,000,000[91]	2011	Fujitsu	40 nm	484 mm2	3,864,000
Quad-core + GPU Core i7 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,160,000,000	2011	Intel	32 nm	216 mm2	5,370,000
Six-core Core i7/8-core Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E/EP) (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	2,270,000,000[92]	2011	Intel	32 nm	434 mm2	5,230,000
Xeon Westmere-EX (10-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	2,600,000,000	2011	Intel	32 nm	512 mm2	5,078,000
Atom "Medfield" (64-bit)	432,000,000[93]	2012	Intel	32 nm	64 mm2	6,750,000
SPARC64 X (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	2,990,000,000[94]	2012	Fujitsu	28 nm	600 mm2	4,983,000
AMD Bulldozer (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,200,000,000[95]	2012	AMD	32 nm	315 mm2	3,810,000
Quad-core + GPU AMD Trinity (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,303,000,000	2012	AMD	32 nm	246 mm2	5,297,000
Quad-core + GPU Core i7 Ivy Bridge (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,400,000,000	2012	Intel	22 nm	160 mm2	8,750,000
POWER7+ (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, 80 MB L3 cache)	2,100,000,000	2012	IBM	32 nm	567 mm2	3,704,000
Six-core zEC12 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	2,750,000,000	2012	IBM	32 nm	597 mm2	4,606,000
Itanium Poulson (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	3,100,000,000	2012	Intel	32 nm	544 mm2	5,699,000
Xeon Phi (61-core 32-bit, 512-bit SIMD, caches)	5,000,000,000[96]	2012	Intel	22 nm	720 mm2	6,944,000
Apple A7 (dual-core 64/32-bit ARM64, "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	1,000,000,000	2013	Apple	28 nm	102 mm2	9,804,000
Six-core Core i7 Ivy Bridge E (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,860,000,000	2013	Intel	22 nm	256 mm2	7,266,000
POWER8 (12-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	4,200,000,000	2013	IBM	22 nm	650 mm2	6,462,000
Xbox One main SoC (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	5,000,000,000	2013	Microsoft, AMD	28 nm	363 mm2	13,770,000
Quad-core + GPU Core i7 Haswell (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,400,000,000[97]	2014	Intel	22 nm	177 mm2	7,910,000
Apple A8 (dual-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	2,000,000,000	2014	Apple	20 nm	89 mm2	22,470,000
Core i7 Haswell-E (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	2,600,000,000[98]	2014	Intel	22 nm	355 mm2	7,324,000
Apple A8X (tri-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	3,000,000,000[99]	2014	Apple	20 nm	128 mm2	23,440,000
Xeon Ivy Bridge-EX (15-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	4,310,000,000[100]	2014	Intel	22 nm	541 mm2	7,967,000
Xeon Haswell-E5 (18-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	5,560,000,000[101]	2014	Intel	22 nm	661 mm2	8,411,000
Quad-core + GPU GT2 Core i7 Skylake K (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,750,000,000	2015	Intel	14 nm	122 mm2	14,340,000
Dual-core + GPU Iris Core i7 Broadwell-U (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,900,000,000[102]	2015	Intel	14 nm	133 mm2	14,290,000
Apple A9 (dual-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	2,000,000,000+	2015	Apple	14 nm (Samsung)	96 mm2 (Samsung)	20,800,000+
				16 nm (TSMC)	104.5 mm2 (TSMC)	19,100,000+
Apple A9X (dual core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	3,000,000,000+	2015	Apple	16 nm	143.9 mm2	20,800,000+
IBM z13 (64-bit, caches)	3,990,000,000	2015	IBM	22 nm	678 mm2	5,885,000
IBM z13 Storage Controller	7,100,000,000	2015	IBM	22 nm	678 mm2	10,472,000
SPARC M7 (32-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	10,000,000,000[103]	2015	Oracle	20 nm	?	?
Core i7 Broadwell-E (10-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	3,200,000,000[104]	2016	Intel	14 nm	246 mm2[105]	13,010,000
Apple A10 Fusion (quad-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	3,300,000,000	2016	Apple	16 nm	125 mm2	26,400,000
HiSilicon Kirin 960 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	4,000,000,000[106]	2016	Huawei	16 nm	110.00 mm2	36,360,000
Xeon Broadwell-E5 (22-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	7,200,000,000[107]	2016	Intel	14 nm	456 mm2	15,790,000
Xeon Phi (72-core 64-bit, 512-bit SIMD, caches)	8,000,000,000	2016	Intel	14 nm	683 mm2	11,710,000
Zip CPU (32-bit, for FPGAs)	1,286 6-LUTs[108]	2016	Gisselquist Technology	?	?	?
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	3,000,000,000[109][110]	2016	Qualcomm	10 nm	72.3 mm2	41,490,000
Apple A11 Bionic (hexa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	4,300,000,000	2017	Apple	10 nm	89.23 mm2	48,190,000
AMD Zen CCX (core complex unit: 4 cores, 8 MB L3 cache)	1,400,000,000[111]	2017	AMD	14 nm (GF 14LPP)	44 mm2	31,800,000
AMD Zeppelin SoC Ryzen (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	4,800,000,000[112]	2017	AMD	14 nm	192 mm2	25,000,000
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Ryzen (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	4,800,000,000[113]	2017	AMD	14 nm	213 mm2	22,530,000
IBM z14 (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	6,100,000,000	2017	IBM	14 nm	696 mm2	8,764,000
IBM z14 Storage Controller (64-bit)	9,700,000,000	2017	IBM	14 nm	696 mm2	13,940,000
HiSilicon Kirin 970 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	5,500,000,000[114]	2017	Huawei	10 nm	96.72 mm2	56,900,000
Xbox One X (Project Scorpio) main SoC (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	7,000,000,000[115]	2017	Microsoft, AMD	16 nm	360 mm2[115]	19,440,000
Xeon Platinum 8180 (28-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	8,000,000,000[116]	2017	Intel	14 nm	?	?
Xeon (unspecified)	7,100,000,000[117]	2017	Intel	14 nm	672 mm2	10,570,000
POWER9 (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	8,000,000,000	2017	IBM	14 nm	695 mm2	11,500,000
Freedom U500 Base Platform Chip (E51, 4×U54) RISC-V (64-bit, caches)	250,000,000[118]	2017	SiFive	28 nm	~30 mm2	8,330,000
SPARC64 XII (12-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	5,450,000,000[119]	2017	Fujitsu	20 nm	795 mm2	6,850,000
Apple A10X Fusion (hexa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	4,300,000,000[120]	2017	Apple	10 nm	96.40 mm2	44,600,000
Centriq 2400 (64/32-bit, SIMD, caches)	18,000,000,000[121]	2017	Qualcomm	10 nm	398 mm2	45,200,000
AMD Epyc (32-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	19,200,000,000	2017	AMD	14 nm	768 mm2	25,000,000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	5,300,000,000[122]	2017	Qualcomm	10 nm	94 mm2	56,400,000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	5,300,000,000[123]	2017	Qualcomm	10 nm	94 mm2	56,400,000
HiSilicon Kirin 710 (octa-core ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	5,500,000,000[124]	2018	Huawei	12 nm	?	?
Apple A12 Bionic (hexa-core ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	6,900,000,000 [125][126]	2018	Apple	7 nm	83.27 mm2	82,900,000
HiSilicon Kirin 980 (octa-core ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	6,900,000,000[127]	2018	Huawei	7 nm	74.13 mm2	93,100,000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx / SCX8180 (octa-core ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	8,500,000,000[128]	2018	Qualcomm	7 nm	112 mm2	75,900,000
Apple A12X Bionic (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	10,000,000,000[129]	2018	Apple	7 nm	122 mm2	82,000,000
Fujitsu A64FX (64/32-bit, SIMD, caches)	8,786,000,000[130]	2018[131]	Fujitsu	7 nm	?	?
Tegra Xavier SoC (64/32-bit)	9,000,000,000[132]	2018	Nvidia	12 nm	350 mm2	25,700,000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	6,700,000,000[133]	2018	Qualcomm	7 nm	73 mm2	91,800,000
AMD Zen 2 core (0.5 MB L2 + 4 MB L3 cache)	475,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	7 nm	7.83 mm2	60,664,000
AMD Zen 2 CCX (core complex: 4 cores, 16 MB L3 cache)	1,900,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	7 nm	31.32 mm2	60,664,000
AMD Zen 2 CCD (core complex die: 8 cores, 32 MB L3 cache)	3,800,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	7 nm	74 mm2	51,350,000
AMD Zen 2 client I/O die	2,090,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	12 nm	125 mm2	16,720,000
AMD Zen 2 server I/O die	8,340,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	12 nm	416 mm2	20,050,000
AMD Zen 2 Renoir die	9,800,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	7 nm	156 mm2	62,820,000
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (64-bit, SIMD, caches, I/O die)	5,990,000,000[135][g]	2019	AMD	7 & 12 nm (TSMC)	199  (74+125) mm2	30,100,000
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G	8,000,000,000[136]	2019	Huawei	7 nm	90.00 mm2	89,000,000
Apple A13 (hexa-core 64-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	8,500,000,000 [137][138]	2019	Apple	7 nm	98.48 mm2	86,300,000
IBM z15 CP chip (12 cores, 256 MB L3 cache)	9,200,000,000[139]	2019	IBM	14 nm	696 mm2	13,220,000
IBM z15 SC chip (960 MB L4 cache)	12,200,000,000	2019	IBM	14 nm	696 mm2	17,530,000
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (64-bit, SIMD, caches, I/O die)	9,890,000,000 [140][141]	2019	AMD	7 & 12 nm (TSMC)	273 mm2	36,230,000
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G	10,300,000,000[142]	2019	Huawei	7 nm	113.31 mm2	90,900,000
AWS Graviton2 (64-bit, 64-core ARM-based, SIMD, caches)[143][144]	30,000,000,000	2019	Amazon	7 nm	?	?
AMD Epyc Rome (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	39,540,000,000 [140][141]	2019	AMD	7 & 12 nm (TSMC)	1,008 mm2	39,226,000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	10,300,000,000[145]	2019	Qualcomm	7 nm	83.54 mm2[146]	123,300,000
TI Jacinto TDA4VM (ARM A72, DSP, SRAM)	3,500,000,000[147]	2020	Texas Instruments	16 nm	?	?
Apple A14 Bionic (hexa-core 64-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	11,800,000,000[148]	2020	Apple	5 nm	88 mm2	134,100,000
Apple M1 (octa-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	16,000,000,000[149]	2020	Apple	5 nm	119 mm2	134,500,000
HiSilicon Kirin 9000	15,300,000,000 [150][151]	2020	Huawei	5 nm	114 mm2	134,200,000
AMD Zen 3 CCX (core complex unit: 8 cores, 32 MB L3 cache)	4,080,000,000[152]	2020	AMD	7 nm	68 mm2	60,000,000
AMD Zen 3 CCD (core complex die)	4,150,000,000[152]	2020	AMD	7 nm	81 mm2	51,230,000
Core 11th gen Rocket Lake (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	6,000,000,000+ [153]	2021	Intel	14 nm +++ 14 nm	276 mm2[154]	37,500,000 or 21,800,000+ [155]
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (64-bit, SIMD, caches, I/O and GPU)	10,700,000,000[156]	2021	AMD	7 nm	180 mm2	59,440,000
AMD Epyc 7763 (Milan) (64-core, 64-bit)	?	2021	AMD	7 & 12 nm (TSMC)	1,064 mm2 (8×81+416)[157]	?
Apple A15	15,000,000,000 [158][159]	2021	Apple	5 nm	107.68 mm2	139,300,000
Apple M1 Pro (10-core, 64-bit)	33,700,000,000[160]	2021	Apple	5 nm	245 mm2[161]	137,600,000
Apple M1 Max (10-core, 64-bit)	57,000,000,000 [162][160]	2021	Apple	5 nm	420.2 mm2[163]	135,600,000
Power10 dual-chip module (30 SMT8 cores or 60 SMT4 cores)	36,000,000,000[164]	2021	IBM	7 nm	1,204 mm2	29,900,000
Dimensity 9000 (ARM64 SoC)	15,300,000,000 [165][166]	2021	Mediatek	4 nm (TSMC N4)	?	?
Apple A16 (ARM64 SoC)	16,000,000,000 [167][168][169]	2022	Apple	4 nm	?	?
Apple M1 Ultra (dual-chip module, 2×10 cores)	114,000,000,000 [170][171]	2022	Apple	5 nm	840.5 mm2[163]	135,600,000
AMD Epyc 7773X (Milan-X) (multi-chip module, 64 cores, 768 MB L3 cache)	26,000,000,000 + Milan[172]	2022	AMD	7 & 12 nm (TSMC)	1,352 mm2 (Milan + 8×36)[172]	?
IBM Telum dual-chip module (2×8 cores, 2×256 MB cache)	45,000,000,000 [173][174]	2022	IBM	7 nm (Samsung)	1,060 mm2	42,450,000
Apple M2 (octa-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	20,000,000,000[175]	2022	Apple	5 nm	?	?
Dimensity 9200 (ARM64 SoC)	17,000,000,000 [176][177][178]	2022	Mediatek	4 nm (TSMC N4P)	?	?
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (octa-core ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	16,000,000,000	2022	Qualcomm	4 nm	268 mm2	59,701,492
AMD EPYC Genoa (4th gen/9004 series) 13-chip module (up to 96 cores and 384 MB (L3) + 96 MB (L2) cache)[179]	90,000,000,000 [180][181]	2022	AMD	5 nm (CCD) 6 nm (IOD)	1,263.34 mm2 12×72.225 (CCD) 396.64 (IOD) [182][183]	71,240,000
HiSilicon Kirin 9000s	9,510,000,000[184]	2023	Huawei	7 nm	107 mm2	107,690,000
Apple M4 (deca-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	28,000,000,000[185]	2024	Apple	3 nm	?	?
Apple M3 (octa-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	25,000,000,000[186]	2023	Apple	3 nm	?	?
Apple M3 Pro (dodeca-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	37,000,000,000[186]	2023	Apple	3 nm	?	?
Apple M3 Max (16-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	92,000,000,000[186]	2023	Apple	3 nm	?	?
Apple A17	19,000,000,000 [187]	2023	Apple	3 nm	103.8 mm2	183,044,315
Sapphire Rapids quad-chip module (up to 60 cores and 112.5 MB of cache)[188]	44,000,000,000– 48,000,000,000[189]	2023	Intel	10 nm ESF (Intel 7)	1,600 mm2	27,500,000– 30,000,000
Apple M2 Pro (12-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	40,000,000,000[190]	2023	Apple	5 nm	?	?
Apple M2 Max (12-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	67,000,000,000[190]	2023	Apple	5 nm	?	?
Apple M2 Ultra (two M2 Max dies)	134,000,000,000[191]	2023	Apple	5 nm	?	?
AMD Epyc Bergamo (4th gen/97X4 series) 9-chip module (up to 128 cores and 256 MB (L3) + 128 MB (L2) cache)	82,000,000,000[192]	2023	AMD	5 nm (CCD) 6 nm (IOD)	?	?
AMD Instinct MI300A (multi-chip module, 24 cores, 128 GB GPU memory + 256 MB (LLC/L3) cache)	146,000,000,000[193][194]	2023	AMD	5 nm (CCD, GCD) 6 nm (IOD)	1,017 mm2	144,000,000
RV32-WUJI: 3-atom-thick molybdenum disulfide on sapphire; RISC-V architecture	5931[195]	2025	?	3000 nm	?	?
Processor	Transistor count	Year	Designer	Process (nm)	Area (mm2)	Transistor density (tr./mm2)

GPUs

[edit]

A graphics processing unit (GPU) is a specialized electronic circuit designed to rapidly manipulate and alter memory to accelerate the building of images in a frame buffer intended for output to a display.

The designer refers to the technology company that designs the logic of the integrated circuit chip (such as Nvidia and AMD). The manufacturer ("Fab.") refers to the semiconductor company that fabricates the chip using its semiconductor manufacturing process at a foundry (such as TSMC and Samsung Semiconductor). The transistor count in a chip is dependent on a manufacturer's fabrication process, with smaller semiconductor nodes typically enabling higher transistor density and thus higher transistor counts.

The random-access memory (RAM) that comes with GPUs (such as VRAM, SGRAM or HBM) greatly increases the total transistor count, with the memory typically accounting for the majority of transistors in a graphics card. For example, Nvidia's Tesla P100 has 15 billion FinFETs (16 nm) in the GPU in addition to 16 GB of HBM2 memory, totaling about 150 billion MOSFETs on the graphics card.^[196] The following table does not include the memory. For memory transistor counts, see the Memory section below.

Processor	Transistor count	Year	Designer(s)	Fab(s)	Process	Area	Transistor density (tr./mm2)	Ref
μPD7220 GDC	40,000	1982	NEC	NEC	5,000 nm	?	?	[197]
ARTC HD63484	60,000	1984	Hitachi	Hitachi	?	?	?	[198]
CBM Agnus	21,000	1985	Commodore	CSG	5,000 nm	?	?	[199][200]
YM7101 VDP	100,000	1988	Yamaha, Sega	Yamaha	?	?	?	[201]
Tom & Jerry	750,000	1993	Flare	IBM	?	?	?	[201]
VDP1	1,000,000	1994	Sega	Hitachi	500 nm	?	?	[202]
Sony GPU	1,000,000	1994	Toshiba	LSI	500 nm	?	?	[203][204][205]
NV1	1,000,000	1995	Nvidia, Sega	SGS	500 nm	90 mm2	11,000
Reality Coprocessor	2,600,000	1996	SGI	NEC	350 nm	81 mm2	32,100	[206]
PowerVR	1,200,000	1996	VideoLogic	NEC	350 nm	?	?	[207]
Voodoo Graphics	1,000,000	1996	3dfx	TSMC	500 nm	?	?	[208][209]
Voodoo Rush	1,000,000	1997	3dfx	TSMC	500 nm	?	?	[208][209]
NV3	3,500,000	1997	Nvidia	SGS, TSMC	350 nm	90 mm2	38,900	[210][211]
i740	3,500,000	1998	Intel, Real3D	Real3D	350 nm	?	?	[208][209]
Voodoo 2	4,000,000	1998	3dfx	TSMC	350 nm	?	?
Voodoo Rush	4,000,000	1998	3dfx	TSMC	350 nm	?	?
NV4	7,000,000	1998	Nvidia	TSMC	350 nm	90 mm2	78,000	[208][211]
PowerVR2 CLX2	10,000,000	1998	VideoLogic	NEC	250 nm	116 mm2	86,200	[212][213][214][215]
PowerVR2 PMX1	6,000,000	1999	VideoLogic	NEC	250 nm	?	?	[216]
Rage 128	8,000,000	1999	ATI	TSMC, UMC	250 nm	70 mm2	114,000	[209]
Voodoo 3	8,100,000	1999	3dfx	TSMC	250 nm	?	?	[217]
Graphics Synthesizer	43,000,000	1999	Sony, Toshiba	Sony, Toshiba	180 nm	279 mm2	154,000	[65][218][64][63]
NV5	15,000,000	1999	Nvidia	TSMC	250 nm	90 mm2	167,000	[209]
NV10	17,000,000	1999	Nvidia	TSMC	220 nm	111 mm2	153,000	[219][211]
NV11	20,000,000	2000	Nvidia	TSMC	180 nm	65 mm2	308,000	[209]
NV15	25,000,000	2000	Nvidia	TSMC	180 nm	81 mm2	309,000	[209]
Voodoo 4	14,000,000	2000	3dfx	TSMC	220 nm	?	?	[208][209]
Voodoo 5	28,000,000	2000	3dfx	TSMC	220 nm	?	?	[208][209]
R100	30,000,000	2000	ATI	TSMC	180 nm	97 mm2	309,000	[209]
Flipper	51,000,000	2000	ArtX	NEC	180 nm	106 mm2	481,000	[65][220]
PowerVR3 KYRO	14,000,000	2001	Imagination	ST	250 nm	?	?	[208][209]
PowerVR3 KYRO II	15,000,000	2001	Imagination	ST	180 nm
NV2A	60,000,000	2001	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	?	?	[208][221]
NV20	57,000,000	2001	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	128 mm2	445,000	[209]
NV25	63,000,000	2002	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	142 mm2	444,000
NV28	36,000,000	2002	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	101 mm2	356,000
NV17/18	29,000,000	2002	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	65 mm2	446,000
R200	60,000,000	2001	ATI	TSMC	150 nm	68 mm2	882,000
R300	107,000,000	2002	ATI	TSMC	150 nm	218 mm2	490,800
R360	117,000,000	2003	ATI	TSMC	150 nm	218 mm2	536,700
NV34	45,000,000	2003	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	124 mm2	363,000
NV34b	45,000,000	2004	Nvidia	TSMC	140 nm	91 mm2	495,000
NV30	125,000,000	2003	Nvidia	TSMC	130 nm	199 mm2	628,000
NV31	80,000,000	2003	Nvidia	TSMC	130 nm	121 mm2	661,000
NV35/38	135,000,000	2003	Nvidia	TSMC	130 nm	207 mm2	652,000
NV36	82,000,000	2003	Nvidia	IBM	130 nm	133 mm2	617,000
R480	160,000,000	2004	ATI	TSMC	130 nm	297 mm2	538,700
NV40	222,000,000	2004	Nvidia	IBM	130 nm	305 mm2	727,900
NV44	75,000,000	2004	Nvidia	IBM	130 nm	110 mm2	681,800
NV41	222,000,000	2005	Nvidia	TSMC	110 nm	225 mm2	986,700	[209]
NV42	198,000,000	2005	Nvidia	TSMC	110 nm	222 mm2	891,900
NV43	146,000,000	2005	Nvidia	TSMC	110 nm	154 mm2	948,100
G70	303,000,000	2005	Nvidia	TSMC, Chartered	110 nm	333 mm2	909,900
Xenos	232,000,000	2005	ATI	TSMC	90 nm	182 mm2	1,275,000	[222][223]
RSX Reality Synthesizer	300,000,000	2005	Nvidia, Sony	Sony	90 nm	186 mm2	1,613,000	[224][225]
R520	321,000,000	2005	ATI	TSMC	90 nm	288 mm2	1,115,000	[209]
RV530	157,000,000	2005	ATI	TSMC	90 nm	150 mm2	1,047,000
RV515	107,000,000	2005	ATI	TSMC	90 nm	100 mm2	1,070,000
R580	384,000,000	2006	ATI	TSMC	90 nm	352 mm2	1,091,000
G71	278,000,000	2006	Nvidia	TSMC	90 nm	196 mm2	1,418,000
G72	112,000,000	2006	Nvidia	TSMC	90 nm	81 mm2	1,383,000
G73	177,000,000	2006	Nvidia	TSMC	90 nm	125 mm2	1,416,000
G80	681,000,000	2006	Nvidia	TSMC	90 nm	480 mm2	1,419,000
G86 Tesla	210,000,000	2007	Nvidia	TSMC	80 nm	127 mm2	1,654,000
G84 Tesla	289,000,000	2007	Nvidia	TSMC	80 nm	169 mm2	1,710,000
RV560	330,000,000	2006	ATI	TSMC	80 nm	230 mm2	1,435,000
R600	700,000,000	2007	ATI	TSMC	80 nm	420 mm2	1,667,000
RV610	180,000,000	2007	ATI	TSMC	65 nm	85 mm2	2,118,000	[209]
RV630	390,000,000	2007	ATI	TSMC	65 nm	153 mm2	2,549,000
G92	754,000,000	2007	Nvidia	TSMC, UMC	65 nm	324 mm2	2,327,000
G94 Tesla	505,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC	65 nm	240 mm2	2,104,000
G96 Tesla	314,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC	65 nm	144 mm2	2,181,000
G98 Tesla	210,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC	65 nm	86 mm2	2,442,000
GT200[226]	1,400,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC	65 nm	576 mm2	2,431,000
RV620	181,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	67 mm2	2,701,000	[209]
RV635	378,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	135 mm2	2,800,000
RV710	242,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	73 mm2	3,315,000
RV730	514,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	146 mm2	3,521,000
RV670	666,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	192 mm2	3,469,000
RV770	956,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	256 mm2	3,734,000
RV790	959,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	282 mm2	3,401,000	[227][209]
G92b Tesla	754,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC, UMC	55 nm	260 mm2	2,900,000	[209]
G94b Tesla	505,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC, UMC	55 nm	196 mm2	2,577,000
G96b Tesla	314,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC, UMC	55 nm	121 mm2	2,595,000
GT200b Tesla	1,400,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC, UMC	55 nm	470 mm2	2,979,000
GT218 Tesla	260,000,000	2009	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	57 mm2	4,561,000	[209]
GT216 Tesla	486,000,000	2009	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	100 mm2	4,860,000
GT215 Tesla	727,000,000	2009	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	144 mm2	5,049,000
RV740	826,000,000	2009	ATI	TSMC	40 nm	137 mm2	6,029,000
Cypress RV870	2,154,000,000	2009	ATI	TSMC	40 nm	334 mm2	6,449,000
Juniper RV840	1,040,000,000	2009	ATI	TSMC	40 nm	166 mm2	6,265,000
Redwood RV830	627,000,000	2010	AMD (ATI)	TSMC	40 nm	104 mm2	6,029,000	[209]
Cedar RV810	292,000,000	2010	AMD	TSMC	40 nm	59 mm2	4,949,000
Cayman RV970	2,640,000,000	2010	AMD	TSMC	40 nm	389 mm2	6,789,000
Barts RV940	1,700,000,000	2010	AMD	TSMC	40 nm	255 mm2	6,667,000
Turks RV930	716,000,000	2011	AMD	TSMC	40 nm	118 mm2	6,068,000
Caicos RV910	370,000,000	2011	AMD	TSMC	40 nm	67 mm2	5,522,000
GF100 Fermi	3,200,000,000	2010	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	526 mm2	6,084,000	[228]
GF110 Fermi	3,000,000,000	2010	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	520 mm2	5,769,000	[228]
GF104 Fermi	1,950,000,000	2011	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	332 mm2	5,873,000	[209]
GF106 Fermi	1,170,000,000	2010	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	238 mm2	4,916,000	[209]
GF108 Fermi	585,000,000	2011	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	116 mm2	5,043,000	[209]
GF119 Fermi	292,000,000	2011	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	79 mm2	3,696,000	[209]
Tahiti GCN1	4,312,711,873	2011	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	365 mm2	11,820,000	[229]
Cape Verde GCN1	1,500,000,000	2012	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	123 mm2	12,200,000	[209]
Pitcairn GCN1	2,800,000,000	2012	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	212 mm2	13,210,000	[209]
GK110 Kepler	7,080,000,000	2012	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	561 mm2	12,620,000	[230][231]
GK104 Kepler	3,540,000,000	2012	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	294 mm2	12,040,000	[232]
GK106 Kepler	2,540,000,000	2012	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	221 mm2	11,490,000	[209]
GK107 Kepler	1,270,000,000	2012	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	118 mm2	10,760,000	[209]
GK208 Kepler	1,020,000,000	2013	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	79 mm2	12,910,000	[209]
Oland GCN1	1,040,000,000	2013	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	90 mm2	11,560,000	[209]
Bonaire GCN2	2,080,000,000	2013	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	160 mm2	13,000,000
Durango (Xbox One)	4,800,000,000	2013	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	375 mm2	12,800,000	[233][234]
Liverpool (PlayStation 4)	?	2013	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	348 mm2	?	[235]
Hawaii GCN2	6,300,000,000	2013	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	438 mm2	14,380,000	[209]
GM200 Maxwell	8,000,000,000	2015	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	601 mm2	13,310,000
GM204 Maxwell	5,200,000,000	2014	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	398 mm2	13,070,000
GM206 Maxwell	2,940,000,000	2014	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	228 mm2	12,890,000
GM107 Maxwell	1,870,000,000	2014	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	148 mm2	12,640,000
Tonga GCN3	5,000,000,000	2014	AMD	TSMC, GlobalFoundries	28 nm	366 mm2	13,660,000
Fiji GCN3	8,900,000,000	2015	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	596 mm2	14,930,000
Durango 2 (Xbox One S)	5,000,000,000	2016	AMD	TSMC	16 nm	240 mm2	20,830,000	[236]
Neo (PlayStation 4 Pro)	5,700,000,000	2016	AMD	TSMC	16 nm	325 mm2	17,540,000	[237]
Ellesmere/Polaris 10 GCN4	5,700,000,000	2016	AMD	Samsung, GlobalFoundries	14 nm	232 mm2	24,570,000	[238]
Baffin/Polaris 11 GCN4	3,000,000,000	2016	AMD	Samsung, GlobalFoundries	14 nm	123 mm2	24,390,000	[209][239]
Lexa/Polaris 12 GCN4	2,200,000,000	2017	AMD	Samsung, GlobalFoundries	14 nm	101 mm2	21,780,000	[209][239]
GP100 Pascal	15,300,000,000	2016	Nvidia	TSMC, Samsung	16 nm	610 mm2	25,080,000	[240][241]
GP102 Pascal	11,800,000,000	2016	Nvidia	TSMC, Samsung	16 nm	471 mm2	25,050,000	[209][241]
GP104 Pascal	7,200,000,000	2016	Nvidia	TSMC	16 nm	314 mm2	22,930,000	[209][241]
GP106 Pascal	4,400,000,000	2016	Nvidia	TSMC	16 nm	200 mm2	22,000,000	[209][241]
GP107 Pascal	3,300,000,000	2016	Nvidia	Samsung	14 nm	132 mm2	25,000,000	[209][241]
GP108 Pascal	1,850,000,000	2017	Nvidia	Samsung	14 nm	74 mm2	25,000,000	[209][241]
Scorpio (Xbox One X)	6,600,000,000	2017	AMD	TSMC	16 nm	367 mm2	17,980,000	[233][242]
Vega 10 GCN5	12,500,000,000	2017	AMD	Samsung, GlobalFoundries	14 nm	484 mm2	25,830,000	[243]
GV100 Volta	21,100,000,000	2017	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	815 mm2	25,890,000	[244]
TU102 Turing	18,600,000,000	2018	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	754 mm2	24,670,000	[245]
TU104 Turing	13,600,000,000	2018	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	545 mm2	24,950,000
TU106 Turing	10,800,000,000	2018	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	445 mm2	24,270,000
TU116 Turing	6,600,000,000	2019	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	284 mm2	23,240,000	[246]
TU117 Turing	4,700,000,000	2019	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	200 mm2	23,500,000	[247]
Vega 20 GCN5	13,230,000,000	2018	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	331 mm2	39,970,000	[209]
Navi 10 RDNA	10,300,000,000	2019	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	251 mm2	41,040,000	[248]
Navi 12 RDNA	?	2020	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	?	?
Navi 14 RDNA	6,400,000,000	2019	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	158 mm2	40,510,000	[249]
Arcturus CDNA	25,600,000,000	2020	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	750 mm2	34,100,000	[250]
GA100 Ampere	54,200,000,000	2020	Nvidia	TSMC	7 nm	826 mm2	65,620,000	[251][252]
GA102 Ampere	28,300,000,000	2020	Nvidia	Samsung	8 nm	628 mm2	45,035,000	[253][254]
GA103 Ampere	22,000,000,000	2022	Nvidia	Samsung	8 nm	496 mm2	44,400,000	[255]
GA104 Ampere	17,400,000,000	2020	Nvidia	Samsung	8 nm	392 mm2	44,390,000	[256]
GA106 Ampere	12,000,000,000	2021	Nvidia	Samsung	8 nm	276 mm2	43,480,000	[257]
GA107 Ampere	8,700,000,000	2021	Nvidia	Samsung	8 nm	200 mm2	43,500,000	[258]
Navi 21 RDNA2	26,800,000,000	2020	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	520 mm2	51,540,000
Navi 22 RDNA2	17,200,000,000	2021	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	335 mm2	51,340,000
Navi 23 RDNA2	11,060,000,000	2021	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	237 mm2	46,670,000
Navi 24 RDNA2	5,400,000,000	2022	AMD	TSMC	6 nm	107 mm2	50,470,000
Aldebaran CDNA2	58,200,000,000 (MCM)	2021	AMD	TSMC	6 nm	1448–1474 mm2[259] 1480 mm2[260] 1490–1580 mm2[261]	39,500,000–40,200,000 39,200,000 36,800,000–39,100,000	[262]
GH100 Hopper	80,000,000,000	2022	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	814 mm2	98,280,000	[263]
AD102 Ada Lovelace	76,300,000,000	2022	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	608.4 mm2	125,411,000	[264]
AD103 Ada Lovelace	45,900,000,000	2022	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	378.6 mm2	121,240,000	[265]
AD104 Ada Lovelace	35,800,000,000	2022	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	294.5 mm2	121,560,000	[265]
AD106 Ada Lovelace	?	2023	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	190 mm2	?	[266][267]
AD107 Ada Lovelace	?	2023	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	146 mm2	?	[266][268]
Navi 31 RDNA3	57,700,000,000 (MCM) 45,400,000,000 (GCD) 6×2,050,000,000 (MCD)	2022	AMD	TSMC	5 nm (GCD) 6 nm (MCD)	531 mm2 (MCM) 306 mm2 (GCD) 6×37.5 mm2 (MCD)	109,200,000 (MCM) 132,400,000 (GCD) 54,640,000 (MCD)	[269][270][271]
Navi 32 RDNA3	28,100,000,000 (MCM)	2023	AMD	TSMC	5 nm (GCD) 6 nm (MCD)	350 mm2 (MCM) 200 mm2 (GCD) 4×37.5 mm2 (MCD)	80,200,000 (MCM)	[272]
Navi 33 RDNA3	13,300,000,000	2023	AMD	TSMC	6 nm	204 mm2	65,200,000	[273]
Aqua Vanjaram CDNA3	153,000,000,000 (MCM)	2023	AMD	TSMC	5 nm (GCD) 6 nm (MCD)	?	?	[274][275]
GB200 Grace Blackwell	208,000,000,000 (MCM)	2024	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	?	?	[276]
GB202 Blackwell	92,200,000,000	2025	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	750 mm2	122,600,000	[277]
GB203 Blackwell	45,600,000,000	2025	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	378 mm2	120,600,000	[278]
GB205 Blackwell	31,100,000,000	2025	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	263 mm2	118,300,000	[279]
GB206 Blackwell	21,900,000,000	2025	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	181 mm2	121,000,000	[280]
GB207 Blackwell	16,900,000,000	2025	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	149 mm2	113,400,000	[281]
Navi 44 RDNA4	29,700,000,000	2025	AMD	TSMC	4 nm	199 mm2	149,200,000	[282]
Navi 48 RDNA4	53,900,000,000	2025	AMD	TSMC	4 nm	357 mm2	151,000,000	[283]
Processor	Transistor count	Year	Designer(s)	Fab(s)	MOS process	Area	Transistor density (tr./mm2)	Ref

FPGA

[edit]

A field-programmable gate array (FPGA) is an integrated circuit designed to be configured by a customer or a designer after manufacturing.

FPGA	Transistor count	Date of introduction	Designer	Manufacturer	Process	Area	Transistor density, tr./mm2	Ref
Virtex	70,000,000	1997	Xilinx
Virtex-E	200,000,000	1998	Xilinx
Virtex-II	350,000,000	2000	Xilinx		130 nm
Virtex-II PRO	430,000,000	2002	Xilinx
Virtex-4	1,000,000,000	2004	Xilinx		90 nm
Virtex-5	1,100,000,000	2006	Xilinx	TSMC	65 nm			[284]
Stratix IV	2,500,000,000	2008	Altera	TSMC	40 nm			[285]
Stratix V	3,800,000,000	2011	Altera	TSMC	28 nm			[citation needed]
Arria 10	5,300,000,000	2014	Altera	TSMC	20 nm			[286]
Virtex-7 2000T	6,800,000,000	2011	Xilinx	TSMC	28 nm			[287]
Stratix 10 SX 2800	17,000,000,000	TBD	Intel	Intel	14 nm	560 mm2	30,400,000	[288][289]
Virtex-Ultrascale VU440	20,000,000,000	Q1 2015	Xilinx	TSMC	20 nm			[290][291]
Virtex-Ultrascale+ VU19P	35,000,000,000	2020	Xilinx	TSMC	16 nm	900 mm2[h]	38,900,000	[292][293][294]
Versal VC1902	37,000,000,000	2H 2019	Xilinx	TSMC	7 nm			[295][296][297]
Stratix 10 GX 10M	43,300,000,000	Q4 2019	Intel	Intel	14 nm	1,400 mm2[h]	30,930,000	[298][299]
Versal VP1802	92,000,000,000	2021 ?[i]	Xilinx	TSMC	7 nm			[300][301]

Memory

[edit]

See also: Random-access memory § Timeline, flash memory § Timeline, and read-only memory § Timeline

Semiconductor memory is an electronic data storage device, often used as computer memory, implemented on integrated circuits. Nearly all semiconductor memories since the 1970s have used MOSFETs (MOS transistors), replacing earlier bipolar junction transistors. There are two major types of semiconductor memory: random-access memory (RAM) and non-volatile memory (NVM). In turn, there are two major RAM types: dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) and static random-access memory (SRAM), as well as two major NVM types: flash memory and read-only memory (ROM).

Typical CMOS SRAM consists of six transistors per cell. For DRAM, 1T1C, which means one transistor and one capacitor structure, is common. Capacitor charged or not^{[clarification needed]} is used to store 1 or 0. In flash memory, the data is stored in floating gates, and the resistance of the transistor is sensed^{[clarification needed]} to interpret the data stored. Depending on how fine scale the resistance could be separated^{[clarification needed]}, one transistor could store up to three bits, meaning eight distinctive levels of resistance possible per transistor. However, a finer scale comes with the cost of repeatability issues, and hence reliability. Typically, low grade 2-bits MLC flash is used for flash drives, so a 16 GB flash drive contains roughly 64 billion transistors.

For SRAM chips, six-transistor cells (six transistors per bit) was the standard.^[302] DRAM chips during the early 1970s had three-transistor cells (three transistors per bit), before single-transistor cells (one transistor per bit) became standard since the era of 4 Kb DRAM in the mid-1970s.^[303][304] In single-level flash memory, each cell contains one floating-gate MOSFET (one transistor per bit),^[305] whereas multi-level flash contains 2, 3 or 4 bits per transistor.

Flash memory chips are commonly stacked up in layers, up to 128-layer in production,^[306] and 136-layer managed,^[307] and available in end-user devices up to 69-layer from manufacturers.

Random-access memory (RAM)

Chip name	Capacity (bits)	RAM type	Transistor count	Date of introduction	Manufacturer(s)	Process	Area	Transistor density (tr./mm2)	Ref
—N/a	1-bit	SRAM (cell)	6	1963	Fairchild	—N/a	—N/a	?	[308]
—N/a	1-bit	DRAM (cell)	1	1965	Toshiba	—N/a	—N/a	?	[309][310]
?	8-bit	SRAM (bipolar)	48	1965	SDS, Signetics	?	?	?	[308]
SP95	16-bit	SRAM (bipolar)	80	1965	IBM	?	?	?	[311]
TMC3162	16-bit	SRAM (TTL)	96	1966	Transitron	—N/a	?	?	[304]
?	?	SRAM (MOS)	?	1966	NEC	?	?	?	[303]
	256-bit	DRAM (IC)	256	1968	Fairchild	?	?	?	[304]
	64-bit	SRAM (PMOS)	384	1968	Fairchild	?	?	?	[303]
	144-bit	SRAM (NMOS)	864	1968	NEC
1101	256-bit	SRAM (PMOS)	1,536	1969	Intel	12,000 nm	?	?	[312][313][314]
1102	1 Kb	DRAM (PMOS)	3,072	1970	Intel, Honeywell	?	?	?	[303]
1103	1 Kb	DRAM (PMOS)	3,072	1970	Intel	8,000 nm	10 mm2	307	[315][302][316][304]
μPD403	1 Kb	DRAM (NMOS)	3,072	1971	NEC	?	?	?	[317]
?	2 Kb	DRAM (PMOS)	6,144	1971	General Instrument	?	12.7 mm2	484	[318]
2102	1 Kb	SRAM (NMOS)	6,144	1972	Intel	?	?	?	[312][319]
?	8 Kb	DRAM (PMOS)	8,192	1973	IBM	?	18.8 mm2	436	[318]
5101	1 Kb	SRAM (CMOS)	6,144	1974	Intel	?	?	?	[312]
2116	16 Kb	DRAM (NMOS)	16,384	1975	Intel	?	?	?	[320][304]
2114	4 Kb	SRAM (NMOS)	24,576	1976	Intel	?	?	?	[312][321]
?	4 Kb	SRAM (CMOS)	24,576	1977	Toshiba	?	?	?	[313]
	64 Kb	DRAM (NMOS)	65,536	1977	NTT	?	35.4 mm2	1851	[318]
		DRAM (VMOS)	65,536	1979	Siemens	?	25.2 mm2	2601	[318]
	16 Kb	SRAM (CMOS)	98,304	1980	Hitachi, Toshiba	?	?	?	[322]
	256 Kb	DRAM (NMOS)	262,144	1980	NEC	1,500 nm	41.6 mm2	6302	[318]
					NTT	1,000 nm	34.4 mm2	7620	[318]
	64 Kb	SRAM (CMOS)	393,216	1980	Matsushita	?	?	?	[322]
	288 Kb	DRAM	294,912	1981	IBM	?	25 mm2	11,800	[323]
	64 Kb	SRAM (NMOS)	393,216	1982	Intel	1,500 nm	?	?	[322]
	256 Kb	SRAM (CMOS)	1,572,864	1984	Toshiba	1,200 nm	?	?	[322][314]
	8 Mb	DRAM	8,388,608	January 5, 1984	Hitachi	?	?	?	[324][325]
	16 Mb	DRAM (CMOS)	16,777,216	1987	NTT	700 nm	148 mm2	113,400	[318]
	4 Mb	SRAM (CMOS)	25,165,824	1990	NEC, Toshiba, Hitachi, Mitsubishi	?	?	?	[322]
	64 Mb	DRAM (CMOS)	67,108,864	1991	Matsushita, Mitsubishi, Fujitsu, Toshiba	400 nm
KM48SL2000	16 Mb	SDRAM	16,777,216	1992	Samsung	?	?	?	[326][327]
?	16 Mb	SRAM (CMOS)	100,663,296	1992	Fujitsu, NEC	400 nm	?	?	[322]
	256 Mb	DRAM (CMOS)	268,435,456	1993	Hitachi, NEC	250 nm
	1 Gb	DRAM	1,073,741,824	January 9, 1995	NEC	250 nm	?	?	[328][329]
					Hitachi	160 nm	?	?
		SDRAM	1,073,741,824	1996	Mitsubishi	150 nm	?	?	[322]
		SDRAM (SOI)	1,073,741,824	1997	Hyundai	?	?	?	[330]
	4 Gb	DRAM (4-bit)	1,073,741,824	1997	NEC	150 nm	?	?	[322]
		DRAM	4,294,967,296	1998	Hyundai	?	?	?	[330]
	8 Gb	SDRAM (DDR3)	8,589,934,592	April 2008	Samsung	50 nm	?	?	[331]
	16 Gb	SDRAM (DDR3)	17,179,869,184	2008
	32 Gb	SDRAM (HBM2)	34,359,738,368	2016	Samsung	20 nm	?	?	[332]
	64 Gb	SDRAM (HBM2)	68,719,476,736	2017
	128 Gb	SDRAM (DDR4)	137,438,953,472	2018	Samsung	10 nm	?	?	[333]
	?	RRAM[334] (3DSoC)[335]	?	2019	SkyWater Technology[336]	90 nm	?	?

Flash memory

Chip name	Capacity (bits)	Flash type	FGMOS transistor count	Date of introduction	Manufacturer(s)	Process	Area	Transistor density (tr./mm2)	Ref
?	256 Kb	NOR	262,144	1985	Toshiba	2,000 nm	?	?	[322]
	1 Mb	NOR	1,048,576	1989	Seeq, Intel	?
	4 Mb	NAND	4,194,304	1989	Toshiba	1,000 nm
	16 Mb	NOR	16,777,216	1991	Mitsubishi	600 nm
DD28F032SA	32 Mb	NOR	33,554,432	1993	Intel	?	280 mm2	120,000	[312][337]
?	64 Mb	NOR	67,108,864	1994	NEC	400 nm	?	?	[322]
		NAND	67,108,864	1996	Hitachi
	128 Mb	NAND	134,217,728	1996	Samsung, Hitachi	?
	256 Mb	NAND	268,435,456	1999	Hitachi, Toshiba	250 nm
	512 Mb	NAND	536,870,912	2000	Toshiba	?	?	?	[338]
	1 Gb	2-bit NAND	536,870,912	2001	Samsung	?	?	?	[322]
					Toshiba, SanDisk	160 nm	?	?	[339]
	2 Gb	NAND	2,147,483,648	2002	Samsung, Toshiba	?	?	?	[340][341]
	8 Gb	NAND	8,589,934,592	2004	Samsung	60 nm	?	?	[340]
	16 Gb	NAND	17,179,869,184	2005	Samsung	50 nm	?	?	[342]
	32 Gb	NAND	34,359,738,368	2006	Samsung	40 nm
THGAM	128 Gb	Stacked NAND	128,000,000,000	April 2007	Toshiba	56 nm	252 mm2	507,900,000	[343]
THGBM	256 Gb	Stacked NAND	256,000,000,000	2008	Toshiba	43 nm	353 mm2	725,200,000	[344]
THGBM2	1 Tb	Stacked 4-bit NAND	256,000,000,000	2010	Toshiba	32 nm	374 mm2	684,500,000	[345]
KLMCG8GE4A	512 Gb	Stacked 2-bit NAND	256,000,000,000	2011	Samsung	?	192 mm2	1,333,000,000	[346]
KLUFG8R1EM	4 Tb	Stacked 3-bit V-NAND	1,365,333,333,504	2017	Samsung	?	150 mm2	9,102,000,000	[347]
eUFS (1 TB)	8 Tb	Stacked 4-bit V-NAND	2,048,000,000,000	2019	Samsung	?	150 mm2	13,650,000,000	[348][349]
?	1 Tb	232L TLC NAND die	333,333,333,333	2022	Micron	?	68.5 mm2 (memory array)	4,870,000,000 (14.6 Gbit/mm2)	[350][351][352][353]
?	16 Tb	232L package	5,333,333,333,333	2022	Micron	?	68.5 mm2 (memory array)	77,900,000,000 (16×14.6 Gbit/mm2)

Read-only memory (ROM)

Chip name	Capacity (bits)	ROM type	Transistor count	Date of introduction	Manufacturer(s)	Process	Area	Ref
?	?	PROM	?	1956	Arma	—N/a	?	[354][355]
	1 Kb	ROM (MOS)	1,024	1965	General Microelectronics	?	?	[356]
3301	1 Kb	ROM (bipolar)	1,024	1969	Intel	—N/a	?	[356]
1702	2 Kb	EPROM (MOS)	2,048	1971	Intel	?	15 mm2	[357]
?	4 Kb	ROM (MOS)	4,096	1974	AMD, General Instrument	?	?	[356]
2708	8 Kb	EPROM (MOS)	8,192	1975	Intel	?	?	[312]
?	2 Kb	EEPROM (MOS)	2,048	1976	Toshiba	?	?	[358]
μCOM-43 ROM	16 Kb	PROM (PMOS)	16,000	1977	NEC	?	?	[359]
2716	16 Kb	EPROM (TTL)	16,384	1977	Intel	—N/a	?	[315][360]
EA8316F	16 Kb	ROM (NMOS)	16,384	1978	Electronic Arrays	?	436 mm2	[356][361]
2732	32 Kb	EPROM	32,768	1978	Intel	?	?	[312]
2364	64 Kb	ROM	65,536	1978	Intel	?	?	[362]
2764	64 Kb	EPROM	65,536	1981	Intel	3,500 nm	?	[312][322]
27128	128 Kb	EPROM	131,072	1982	Intel	?
27256	256 Kb	EPROM (HMOS)	262,144	1983	Intel	?	?	[312][363]
?	256 Kb	EPROM (CMOS)	262,144	1983	Fujitsu	?	?	[364]
	512 Kb	EPROM (NMOS)	524,288	1984	AMD	1,700 nm	?	[322]
27512	512 Kb	EPROM (HMOS)	524,288	1984	Intel	?	?	[312][365]
?	1 Mb	EPROM (CMOS)	1,048,576	1984	NEC	1,200 nm	?	[322]
	4 Mb	EPROM (CMOS)	4,194,304	1987	Toshiba	800 nm
	16 Mb	EPROM (CMOS)	16,777,216	1990	NEC	600 nm
		MROM	16,777,216	1995	AKM, Hitachi	?	?	[329]

Transistor computers

[edit]

Main article: Transistor computer

Part of an IBM 7070 card cage populated with Standard Modular System cards

Before transistors were invented, relays were used in commercial tabulating machines and experimental early computers. The world's first working programmable, fully automatic digital computer,^[366] the 1941 Z3 22-bit word length computer, had 2,600 relays, and operated at a clock frequency of about 4–5 Hz. The 1940 Complex Number Computer had fewer than 500 relays,^[367] but it was not fully programmable. The earliest practical computers used vacuum tubes and solid-state diode logic. ENIAC had 18,000 vacuum tubes, 7,200 crystal diodes, and 1,500 relays, with many of the vacuum tubes containing two triode elements.

The second generation of computers were transistor computers that featured boards filled with discrete transistors, solid-state diodes and magnetic memory cores. The experimental 1953 48-bit Transistor Computer, developed at the University of Manchester, is widely believed to be the first transistor computer to come into operation anywhere in the world (the prototype had 92 point-contact transistors and 550 diodes).^[368] A later version the 1955 machine had a total of 250 junction transistors and 1,300 point-contact diodes. The Computer also used a small number of tubes in its clock generator, so it was not the first fully transistorized. The ETL Mark III, developed at the Electrotechnical Laboratory in 1956, may have been the first transistor-based electronic computer using the stored program method. It had about "130 point-contact transistors and about 1,800 germanium diodes were used for logic elements, and these were housed on 300 plug-in packages which could be slipped in and out."^[369] The 1958 decimal architecture IBM 7070 was the first transistor computer to be fully programmable. It had about 30,000 alloy-junction germanium transistors and 22,000 germanium diodes, on approximately 14,000 Standard Modular System (SMS) cards. The 1959 MOBIDIC, short for "MOBIle DIgital Computer", at 12,000 pounds (6.0 short tons) mounted in the trailer of a semi-trailer truck, was a transistorized computer for battlefield data.

The third generation of computers used integrated circuits (ICs).^[370] The 1962 15-bit Apollo Guidance Computer used "about 4,000 "Type-G" (3-input NOR gate) circuits" for about 12,000 transistors plus 32,000 resistors.^[371]The IBM System/360, introduced 1964, used discrete transistors in hybrid circuit packs.^[370] The 1965 12-bit PDP-8 CPU had 1409 discrete transistors and over 10,000 diodes, on many cards. Later versions, starting with the 1968 PDP-8/I, used integrated circuits. The PDP-8 was later reimplemented as a microprocessor as the Intersil 6100, see below.^[372]

The next generation of computers were the microcomputers, starting with the 1971 Intel 4004, which used MOS transistors. These were used in home computers or personal computers (PCs).

This list includes early transistorized computers (second generation) and IC-based computers (third generation) from the 1950s and 1960s.

Computer	Transistor count	Year	Manufacturer	Notes	Ref
Transistor Computer	92	1953	University of Manchester	Point-contact transistors, 550 diodes. Lacked stored program capability.	[368]
TRADIC	700	1954	Bell Labs	Point-contact transistors	[368]
Transistor Computer (full size)	250	1955	University of Manchester	Discrete point-contact transistors, 1,300 diodes	[368]
IBM 608	3,000	1955	IBM	Germanium transistors	[373]
ETL Mark III	130	1956	Electrotechnical Laboratory	Point-contact transistors, 1,800 diodes, stored program capability	[368][369]
Metrovick 950	200	1956	Metropolitan-Vickers	Discrete junction transistors
NEC NEAC-2201	600	1958	NEC	Germanium transistors	[374]
Hitachi MARS-1	1,000	1958	Hitachi		[375]
IBM 7070	30,000	1958	IBM	Alloy-junction germanium transistors, 22,000 diodes	[376]
Matsushita MADIC-I	400	1959	Matsushita	Bipolar transistors	[377]
NEC NEAC-2203	2,579	1959	NEC		[378]
Toshiba TOSBAC-2100	5,000	1959	Toshiba		[379]
IBM 7090	50,000	1959	IBM	Discrete germanium transistors	[380]
PDP-1	2,700	1959	Digital Equipment Corporation	Discrete transistors
Olivetti Elea 9003	?	1959	Olivetti	300,000 (?) discrete transistors and diodes	[381]
Mitsubishi MELCOM 1101	3,500	1960	Mitsubishi	Germanium transistors	[382]
M18 FADAC	1,600	1960	Autonetics	Discrete transistors
CPU of IBM 7030 Stretch	169,100	1961	IBM	World's fastest computer from 1961 to 1964	[383]
D-17B	1,521	1962	Autonetics	Discrete transistors
NEC NEAC-L2	16,000	1964	NEC	Ge transistors	[384]
CDC 6600 (entire computer)	400,000	1964	Control Data Corporation	World's fastest computer from 1964 to 1969	[385]
IBM System/360	?	1964	IBM	Hybrid circuits
PDP-8 "Straight-8"	1,409[372]	1965	Digital Equipment Corporation	discrete transistors, 10,000 diodes
PDP-8/S	1,001[386][387][388]	1966	Digital Equipment Corporation	discrete transistors, diodes
PDP-8/I	1,409[citation needed]	1968[389]	Digital Equipment Corporation	74 series TTL circuits[390]
Apollo Guidance Computer Block I	12,300	1966	Raytheon / MIT Instrumentation Laboratory	4,100 ICs, each containing a 3-transistor, 3-input NOR gate. (Block II had 2,800 dual 3-input NOR gates ICs.)

Logic functions

[edit]

Transistor count for generic logic functions is based on static CMOS implementation.^[391]

Function	Transistor count	Ref.
NOT	2
Buffer	4
NAND 2-input	4
NOR 2-input	4
AND 2-input	6
OR 2-input	6
NAND 3-input	6
NOR 3-input	6
XOR 2-input	6
XNOR 2-input	8
MUX 2-input with TG	6
MUX 4-input with TG	18
NOT MUX 2-input	8
MUX 4-input	24
1-bit full adder	24
1-bit adder–subtractor	48
AND-OR-INVERT	6	[392]
Latch, D gated	8
Flip-flop, edge triggered dynamic D with reset	12
8-bit multiplier	3,000
16-bit multiplier	9,000
32-bit multiplier	21,000	[citation needed]
small-scale integration	2–100	[393]
medium-scale integration	100–500	[393]
large-scale integration	500–20,000	[393]
very-large-scale integration	20,000–1,000,000	[393]
ultra-large scale integration	>1,000,000

Parallel systems

[edit]

Historically, each processing element in earlier parallel systems—like all CPUs of that time—was a serial computer built out of multiple chips. As transistor counts per chip increases, each processing element could be built out of fewer chips, and then later each multi-core processor chip could contain more processing elements.^[394]

Goodyear MPP: (1983?) 8 pixel processors per chip, 3,000 to 8,000 transistors per chip.^[394]

Brunel University Scape (single-chip array-processing element): (1983) 256 pixel processors per chip, 120,000 to 140,000 transistors per chip.^[394]

Cell Broadband Engine: (2006) with 9 cores per chip, had 234 million transistors per chip.^[395]

Other devices

[edit]

Device type	Device name	Transistor count	Date of introduction	Designer(s)	Manufacturer(s)	MOS process	Area	Transistor density, tr./mm2	Ref
Deep learning engine / IPU[j]	Colossus GC2	23,600,000,000	2018	Graphcore	TSMC	16 nm	~800 mm2	29,500,000	[396][397][398][better source needed]
Deep learning engine / IPU	Wafer Scale Engine	1,200,000,000,000	2019	Cerebras	TSMC	16 nm	46,225 mm2	25,960,000	[1][2][3][4]
Deep learning engine / IPU	Wafer Scale Engine 2	2,600,000,000,000	2020	Cerebras	TSMC	7 nm	46,225 mm2	56,250,000	[5][399][400]
Network switch	NVLink4 NVSwitch	25,100,000,000	2022	Nvidia	TSMC	N4 (4 nm)	294 mm2	85,370,000	[401]

Transistor density

[edit]

The transistor density is the number of transistors that are fabricated per unit area, typically measured in terms of the number of transistors per square millimeter (mm²). The transistor density usually correlates with the gate length of a semiconductor node (also known as a semiconductor manufacturing process), typically measured in nanometers (nm). As of 2019^[update], the semiconductor node with the highest transistor density is TSMC's 5 nanometer node, with 171.3 million transistors per square millimeter (note this corresponds to a transistor-transistor spacing of 76.4 nm, far greater than the relative meaningless "5nm")^[402]

MOSFET nodes

[edit]

Further information: List of semiconductor scale examples

Semiconductor nodes

Node name	Transistor density (transistors/mm2)	Production year	Process	MOSFET	Manufacturer(s)	Ref
?	?	1960	20,000 nm	PMOS	Bell Labs	[403][404]
?	?	1960	20,000 nm	NMOS
?	?	1963	?	CMOS	Fairchild	[405]
?	?	1964	?	PMOS	General Microelectronics	[406]
?	?	1968	20,000 nm	CMOS	RCA	[407]
?	?	1969	12,000 nm	PMOS	Intel	[322][314]
?	?	1970	10,000 nm	CMOS	RCA	[407]
?	300	1970	8,000 nm	PMOS	Intel	[316][304]
?	?	1971	10,000 nm	PMOS	Intel	[408]
?	480	1971	?	PMOS	General Instrument	[318]
?	?	1973	?	NMOS	Texas Instruments	[318]
?	220	1973	?	NMOS	Mostek	[318]
?	?	1973	7,500 nm	NMOS	NEC	[18][17]
?	?	1973	6,000 nm	PMOS	Toshiba	[19][409]
?	?	1976	5,000 nm	NMOS	Hitachi, Intel	[318]
?	?	1976	5,000 nm	CMOS	RCA
?	?	1976	4,000 nm	NMOS	Zilog
?	?	1976	3,000 nm	NMOS	Intel	[410]
?	1,850	1977	?	NMOS	NTT	[318]
?	?	1978	3,000 nm	CMOS	Hitachi	[411]
?	?	1978	2,500 nm	NMOS	Texas Instruments	[318]
?	?	1978	2,000 nm	NMOS	NEC, NTT
?	2,600	1979	?	VMOS	Siemens
?	7,280	1979	1,000 nm	NMOS	NTT
?	7,620	1980	1,000 nm	NMOS	NTT
?	?	1983	2,000 nm	CMOS	Toshiba	[322]
?	?	1983	1,500 nm	CMOS	Intel	[318]
?	?	1983	1,200 nm	CMOS	Intel
?	?	1984	800 nm	CMOS	NTT
?	?	1987	700 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu
?	?	1989	600 nm	CMOS	Mitsubishi, NEC, Toshiba	[322]
?	?	1989	500 nm	CMOS	Hitachi, Mitsubishi, NEC, Toshiba
?	?	1991	400 nm	CMOS	Matsushita, Mitsubishi, Fujitsu, Toshiba
?	?	1993	350 nm	CMOS	Sony
?	?	1993	250 nm	CMOS	Hitachi, NEC
3LM	32,000	1994	350 nm	CMOS	NEC	[206]
?	?	1995	160 nm	CMOS	Hitachi	[322]
?	?	1996	150 nm	CMOS	Mitsubishi
TSMC 180 nm	?	1998	180 nm	CMOS	TSMC	[412]
CS80	?	1999	180 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu	[413]
?	?	1999	180 nm	CMOS	Intel, Sony, Toshiba	[312][218]
CS85	?	1999	170 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu	[414]
Samsung 140 nm	?	1999	140 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[322]
?	?	2001	130 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu, Intel	[413][312]
Samsung 100 nm	?	2001	100 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[322]
?	?	2002	90 nm	CMOS	Sony, Toshiba, Samsung	[218][340]
CS100	?	2003	90 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu	[413]
Intel 90 nm	1,450,000	2004	90 nm	CMOS	Intel	[415][312]
Samsung 80 nm	?	2004	80 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[416]
?	?	2004	65 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu, Toshiba	[417]
Samsung 60 nm	?	2004	60 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[340]
TSMC 45 nm	?	2004	45 nm	CMOS	TSMC
Elpida 90 nm	?	2005	90 nm	CMOS	Elpida Memory	[418]
CS200	?	2005	65 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu	[419][413]
Samsung 50 nm	?	2005	50 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[342]
Intel 65 nm	2,080,000	2006	65 nm	CMOS	Intel	[415]
Samsung 40 nm	?	2006	40 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[342]
Toshiba 56 nm	?	2007	56 nm	CMOS	Toshiba	[343]
Matsushita 45 nm	?	2007	45 nm	CMOS	Matsushita	[81]
Intel 45 nm	3,300,000	2008	45 nm	CMOS	Intel	[420]
Toshiba 43 nm	?	2008	43 nm	CMOS	Toshiba	[344]
TSMC 40 nm	?	2008	40 nm	CMOS	TSMC	[421]
Toshiba 32 nm	?	2009	32 nm	CMOS	Toshiba	[422]
Intel 32 nm	7,500,000	2010	32 nm	CMOS	Intel	[420]
?	?	2010	20 nm	CMOS	Hynix, Samsung	[423][342]
Intel 22 nm	15,300,000	2012	22 nm	CMOS	Intel	[420]
IMFT 20 nm	?	2012	20 nm	CMOS	IMFT	[424]
Toshiba 19 nm	?	2012	19 nm	CMOS	Toshiba
Hynix 16 nm	?	2013	16 nm	FinFET	SK Hynix	[423]
TSMC 16 nm	28,880,000	2013	16 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[425][426]
Samsung 10 nm	51,820,000	2013	10 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[427][428]
Intel 14 nm	37,500,000	2014	14 nm	FinFET	Intel	[420]
14LP	32,940,000	2015	14 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[427]
TSMC 10 nm	52,510,000	2016	10 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[425][429]
12LP	36,710,000	2017	12 nm	FinFET	GlobalFoundries, Samsung	[239]
N7FF	96,500,000 101,850,000[430]	2017	7 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[431][432][433]
8LPP	61,180,000	2018	8 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[427]
7LPE	95,300,000	2018	7 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[432]
Intel 10 nm	100,760,000 106,100,000[430]	2018	10 nm	FinFET	Intel	[434]
5LPE	126,530,000 133,560,000[430] 134,900,000[435]	2018	5 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[436][437]
N7FF+	113,900,000	2019	7 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[431][432]
CLN5FF	171,300,000 185,460,000[430]	2019	5 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[402]
Intel 7	100,760,000 106,100,000[430]	2021	7 nm	FinFET	Intel
4LPE	145,700,000[435]	2021	4 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[438][439][440]
N4	196,600,000[430][441]	2021	4 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[442]
N4P	196,600,000[430][441]	2022	4 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[443]
3GAE	202,850,000[430]	2022	3 nm	MBCFET	Samsung	[444][438][445]
N3	314,730,000[430]	2022	3 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[446][447]
N4X	?	2023	4 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[448][449][450]
N3E	?	2023	3 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[447][451]
3GAP	?	2023	3 nm	MBCFET	Samsung	[438]
Intel 4	160,000,000[452]	2023	4 nm	FinFET	Intel	[453][454][455]
Intel 3	?	2023	3 nm	FinFET	Intel	[454][455]
Intel 20A	?	2024	2 nm	RibbonFET	Intel	[454][455]
Intel 18A	?	2025	sub-2 nm	RibbonFET	Intel	[454]
2GAP	?	2025	2 nm	MBCFET	Samsung	[438]
N2	?	2025	2 nm	GAAFET	TSMC	[447][451]
Samsung 1.4 nm	?	2027	1.4 nm	?	Samsung	[456]

Gate count

[edit]

In certain applications, the term gate count is preferred over the term transistor count. It refers to the number of logic gates built with transistors and other electronic devices needed to implement a design.^{[457][458][459][460]}

See also

[edit]

• Dennard scaling
• Electronics industry
• Integrated circuit
• List of best-selling electronic devices
• List of semiconductor scale examples
• MOSFET
• Semiconductor
• Semiconductor device
• Semiconductor device fabrication
• Semiconductor industry
• Transistor
• Cerebras Systems

Notes

[edit]

1. Microprocessor specialised for processing machine learning workloads, pioneered by UK based semiconductor startup Graphcore.
2. Declassified 1998
3. The TMS1000 is a microcontroller, the transistor count includes memory and input/output controllers, not just the CPU.
4. 2668 without depletion mode pull-up transistors
5. 3,510 without depletion mode pull-up transistors
6. 6,813 without depletion mode pull-up transistors
7. 3,900,000,000 core chiplet die, 2,090,000,000 I/O die
8. Estimate
9. Versal Premium are confirmed to be shipping in 1H 2021 but nothing was mentioned about the VP1802 in particular. Usually Xilinx makes separate news for the release of its biggest devices so the VP1802 is likely to be released later.
10. "Intelligence Processing Unit"

References

[edit]

1. Hruska, Joel (August 2019). "Cerebras Systems Unveils 1.2 Trillion Transistor Wafer-Scale Processor for AI". extremetech.com. Retrieved September 6, 2019.
2. Feldman, Michael (August 2019). "Machine Learning chip breaks new ground with waferscale integration". nextplatform.com. Retrieved September 6, 2019.
3. Cutress, Ian (August 2019). "Hot Chips 31 Live Blogs: Cerebras' 1.2 Trillion Transistor Deep Learning Processor". anandtech.com. Archived from the original on August 20, 2019. Retrieved September 6, 2019.
4. "A Look at Cerebras Wafer-Scale Engine: Half Square Foot Silicon Chip". WikiChip Fuse. November 16, 2019. Retrieved December 2, 2019.
5. Everett, Joseph (August 26, 2020). "World's largest CPU has 850,000 7 nm cores that are optimized for AI and 2.6 trillion transistors". TechReportArticles.
6. "John Gustafson's answer to How many individual transistors are in the world's most powerful supercomputer?". Quora. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
7. Pires, Francisco (October 5, 2022). "Water-Based Chips Could be Breakthrough for Neural Networking, AI: Wetware has gained an entirely new meaning". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved October 5, 2022.
8. Laws, David (April 2, 2018). "13 Sextillion & Counting: The Long & Winding Road to the Most Frequently Manufactured Human Artifact in History". Computer History Museum.
9. Handy, Jim (May 26, 2014). "How Many Transistors Have Ever Shipped?". Forbes.
10. "1971: Microprocessor Integrates CPU Function onto a Single Chip". The Silicon Engine. Computer History Museum. Retrieved September 4, 2019.
11. Holt, Ray. "World's First Microprocessor". Retrieved March 5, 2016. 1st fully integrated chip set microprocessor
12. "Alpha 21364 - Microarchitectures - Compaq - WikiChip". en.wikichip.org. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
13. Holt, Ray M. (1998). The F14A Central Air Data Computer and the LSI Technology State-of-the-Art in 1968. p. 8.
14. Holt, Ray M. (2013). "F14 TomCat MOS-LSI Chip Set". First Microprocessor. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
15. Ken Shirriff. "The Texas Instruments TMX 1795: the (almost) first, forgotten microprocessor". 2015.
16. Ryoichi Mori; Hiroaki Tajima; Morihiko Tajima; Yoshikuni Okada (October 1977). "Microprocessors in Japan". Euromicro Newsletter. 3 (4): 50–7. doi:10.1016/0303-1268(77)90111-0.
17. "NEC 751 (uCOM-4)". The Antique Chip Collector's Page. Archived from the original on May 25, 2011. Retrieved June 11, 2010.
18. "1970s: Development and evolution of microprocessors" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
19. "1973: 12-bit engine-control microprocessor (Toshiba)" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
20. "Low Bandwidth Timeline – Semiconductor". Texas Instruments. Retrieved June 22, 2016.
21. Ken Shirriff."Inside the HP Nanoprocessor: a high-speed processor that can't even add". 2020. quote: "By my count, the Nanoprocessor has 4639 transistors. ... 3829 unique transistors. Of these, 1061 act as pull-ups, while 2668 are active. In comparison, the 6502 has 4237 transistors, of which 3218 are active. The 8008 has 3500 transistors and the Motorola 6800 has 4100 transistors."
22. "The MOS 6502 and the Best Layout Guy in the World". research.swtch.com. January 3, 2011. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
23. Shirriff, Ken (January 2023). "Counting the transistors in the 8086 processor: it's harder than you might think".
24. "Digital History: ZILOG Z8000 (APRIL 1979)". OLD-COMPUTERS.COM : The Museum. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
25. "Chip Hall of Fame: Motorola MC68000 Microprocessor". IEEE Spectrum. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. June 30, 2017. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
26. Microprocessors: 1971 to 1976 Archived December 3, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Christiansen
27. "Microprocessors 1976 to 1981". weber.edu. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
28. "W65C816S 16-bit Core". www.westerndesigncenter.com. Retrieved September 12, 2017.
29. Demone, Paul (November 9, 2000). "ARM's Race to World Domination". real world technologies. Retrieved July 20, 2015.
30. Hand, Tom. "The Harris RTX 2000 Microcontroller" (PDF). mpeforth.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
31. "Forth chips list". UltraTechnology. March 15, 2001. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
32. Koopman, Philip J. (1989). "4.4 Architecture of the Novix NC4016". Stack Computers: the new wave. Ellis Horwood Series in Computers and Their Applications. Carnegie Mellon University. ISBN 978-0745804187. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
33. "Fujitsu SPARC". cpu-collection.de. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
34. Kimura S, Komoto Y, Yano Y (1988). "Implementation of the V60/V70 and its FRM function". IEEE Micro. 8 (2): 22–36. doi:10.1109/40.527. S2CID 9507994.
35. "VL2333 - VTI - WikiChip". en.wikichip.org. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
36. Inayoshi H, Kawasaki I, Nishimukai T, Sakamura K (1988). "Realization of Gmicro/200". IEEE Micro. 8 (2): 12–21. doi:10.1109/40.526. S2CID 36938046.
37. Bosshart, P.; Hewes, C.; Mi-Chang Chang; Kwok-Kit Chau; Hoac, C.; Houston, T.; Kalyan, V.; Lusky, S.; Mahant-Shetti, S.; Matzke, D.; Ruparel, K.; Ching-Hao Shaw; Sridhar, T.; Stark, D. (October 1987). "A 553K-Transistor LISP Processor Chip". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. 22 (5): 202–3. doi:10.1109/ISSCC.1987.1157084. S2CID 195841103.
38. Fahlén, Lennart E.; Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (1987). "3. Hardware requirements for artificial intelligence § Lisp Machines: TI Explorer". Arms and Artificial Intelligence: Weapon and Arms Control Applications of Advanced Computing. SIPRI Monograph Series. Oxford University Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-19-829122-0.
39. Jouppi, Norman P.; Tang, Jeffrey Y. F. (July 1989). "A 20-MIPS Sustained 32-bit CMOS Microprocessor with High Ratio of Sustained to Peak Performance". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. 24 (5): i. Bibcode:1989IJSSC..24.1348J. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.85.988. doi:10.1109/JSSC.1989.572612. WRL Research Report 89/11.
40. "The CPU shack museum". CPUshack.com. May 15, 2005. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
41. "Intel i960 Embedded Microprocessor". National High Magnetic Field Laboratory. Florida State University. March 3, 2003. Archived from the original on March 3, 2003. Retrieved June 29, 2019.
42. Venkatasawmy, Rama (2013). The Digitization of Cinematic Visual Effects: Hollywood's Coming of Age. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 198. ISBN 9780739176214.
43. Bakoglu, Grohoski, and Montoye. "The IBM RISC System/6000 processor: Hardware overview." IBM J. Research and Development. Vol. 34 No. 1, January 1990, pp. 12-22.
44. "SH Microprocessor Leading the Nomadic Era" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
45. "SH2: A Low Power RISC Micro for Consumer Applications" (PDF). Hitachi. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 10, 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
46. "HARP-1: A 120 MHz Superscalar PA-RISC Processor" (PDF). Hitachi. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 23, 2016. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
47. White and Dhawan. "POWER2: next generation of the RISC System/6000 family" IBM J. Research and Development. Vol. 38 No. 5, September 1994, pp. 493-502.
48. "ARM7 Statistics". Poppyfields.net. May 27, 1994. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
49. "Forth Multiprocessor Chip MuP21". www.ultratechnology.com. Retrieved September 6, 2019. MuP21 has a 21-bit CPU core, a memory coprocessor, and a video coprocessor
50. "F21 CPU". www.ultratechnology.com. Retrieved September 6, 2019. F21 offers video I/O, analog I/O, serial network I/O, and a parallel I/O port on chip. F21 has a transistor count of about 15,000 vs about 7,000 for MuP21.
51. "Ars Technica: PowerPC on Apple: An Architectural History, Part I - Page 2 - (8/2004)". archive.arstechnica.com. Retrieved August 11, 2020.
52. Gary et al. (1994). "The PowerPC 603 microprocessor: a low-power design for portable applications." Proceedings of COMPCON 94. DOI: 10.1109/CMPCON.1994.282894
53. Slaton et al. (1995). "The PowerPC 603e microprocessor: an enhanced, low-power, superscalar microprocessor." Proceedings of ICCD '95 International Conference on Computer Design. DOI: 10.1109/ICCD.1995.528810
54. Bowhill, William J. et al. (1995). "Circuit Implementation of a 300-MHz 64-bit Second-generation CMOS Alpha CPU". Digital Technical Journal, Volume 7, Number 1, pp. 100–118.
55. "Intel Pentium Pro 180". hw-museum.cz. February 20, 2015. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
56. Kozierok, Charles M. (April 17, 2001). "PC Guide Intel Pentium Pro ("P6")". The PC Guide. Archived from the original on April 14, 2001. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
57. Gaddis, N.; Lotz, J. (November 1996). "A 64-b quad-issue CMOS RISC microprocessor". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 31 (11): pp. 1697–1702.
58. Bouchard, Gregg. "Design objectives of the 0.35 μm Alpha 21164 Microprocessor". IEEE Hot Chips Symposium, August 1996, IEEE Computer Society.
59. Ulf Samuelsson. "Transistor count of common uCs?". www.embeddedrelated.com. Retrieved September 8, 2019. IIRC, The AVR core is 12,000 gates, and the megaAVR core is 20,000 gates. Each gate is 4 transistors. The chip is considerably larger since the memory uses quite a lot.
60. Gronowski, Paul E. et al. (May 1998). "High-performance microprocessor design". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 33 (5): pp. 676–686.
61. Nakagawa, Norio; Arakawa, Fumio (April 1999). "Entertainment Systems and High-Performance Processor SH-4" (PDF). Hitachi Review. 48 (2): 58–63. Retrieved March 18, 2023.
62. Nishii, O.; Arakawa, F.; Ishibashi, K.; Nakano, S.; Shimura, T.; Suzuki, K.; Tachibana, M.; Totsuka, Y.; Tsunoda, T.; Uchiyama, K.; Yamada, T.; Hattori, T.; Maejima, H.; Nakagawa, N.; Narita, S.; Seki, M.; Shimazaki, Y.; Satomura, R.; Takasuga, T.; Hasegawa, A. (1998). "A 200 MHZ 1.2 W 1.4 GFLOPS microprocessor with graphic operation unit". 1998 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers, ISSCC. First Edition (Cat. No. 98CH36156). IEEE. pp. 18.1-1 - 18.1-11. doi:10.1109/ISSCC.1998.672469. ISBN 0-7803-4344-1. S2CID 45392734.
63. Diefendorff, Keith (April 19, 1999). "Sony's Emotionally Charged Chip: Killer Floating-Point "Emotion Engine" To Power PlayStation 2000" (PDF). Microprocessor Report. 13 (5). S2CID 29649747. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 28, 2019. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
64. Hennessy, John L.; Patterson, David A. (May 29, 2002). Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach (3 ed.). Morgan Kaufmann. p. 491. ISBN 978-0-08-050252-6. Retrieved April 9, 2013.
65. "NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX GPU Review". PC Perspective. June 22, 2005. Retrieved June 18, 2019.
66. Ando, H.; Yoshida, Y.; Inoue, A.; Sugiyama, I.; Asakawa, T.; Morita, K.; Muta, T.; Otokurumada, T.; Okada, S.; Yamashita, H.; Satsukawa, Y.; Konmoto, A.; Yamashita, R.; Sugiyama, H. (2003). "A 1.3GHz fifth generation SPARC64 microprocessor". Proceedings of the 40th Annual Design Automation Conference. Design Automation Conference. pp. 702–705. doi:10.1145/775832.776010. ISBN 1-58113-688-9.
67. Krewell, Kevin (21 October 2002). "Fujitsu's SPARC64 V Is Real Deal". Microprocessor Report.
68. "Intel Pentium M Processor 1.60 GHZ, 1M Cache, 400 MHZ FSB Product Specifications".
69. "EE+GS". PS2 Dev Wiki.
70. "Sony MARKETING (JAPAN) ANNOUNCES LAUNCH OF "PSX" DESR-5000 and DESR-7000 TOWARDS THE END OF 2003" (Press release). Sony. November 27, 2003.
71. "EMOTION ENGINE AND GRAPHICS SYNTHESIZER USED IN THE CORE OF PLAYSTATION BECOME ONE CHIP" (PDF). Sony. April 21, 2003. Retrieved March 19, 2023.
72. "Sony PSX's 90nm CPU is 'not 90nm'". The Register. January 30, 2004.
73. "Semi Insights stands by 'not 90-nm' description of PSX chip". EE Times. February 5, 2004.
74. "Intel Pentium M Processor 760 (2M Cache, 2.00A GHZ, 533 MHZ FSB) Product Specifications".
75. Fujitsu Limited (August 2004). SPARC64 V Processor For UNIX Server.
76. "A Glimpse Inside The Cell Processor". Gamasutra. July 13, 2006. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
77. "Intel Pentium D Processor 920". Intel. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
78. "PRESS KIT — Dual-core Intel Itanium Processor". Intel. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
79. Toepelt, Bert (January 8, 2009). "AMD Phenom II X4: 45nm Benchmarked — The Phenom II And AMD's Dragon Platform". TomsHardware.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
80. "ARM (Advanced RISC Machines) Processors". EngineersGarage.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
81. "Panasonic starts to sell a New-generation UniPhier System LSI". Panasonic. October 10, 2007. Retrieved July 2, 2019.
82. "SPARC64 VI Extensions" page 56, Fujitsu Limited, Release 1.3, 27 March 2007
83. Morgan, Timothy Prickett (17 July 2008). "Fujitsu and Sun Flex Their Quads with New Sparc Server Lineup". The Unix Guardian, Vol. 8, No. 27.
84. Takumi Maruyama (2009). SPARC64 VIIIfx: Fujitsu's New Generation Octo Core Processor for PETA Scale computing (PDF). Proceedings of Hot Chips 21. IEEE Computer Society. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2010. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
85. "Intel Atom N450 specifications". Intel. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
86. "Intel Atom D510 specifications". Intel. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
87. Stokes, Jon (February 10, 2010). "Sun's 1 billion-transistor, 16-core Niagara 3 processor". ArsTechnica.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
88. "IBM to Ship World's Fastest Microprocessor". IBM. September 1, 2010. Archived from the original on September 5, 2010. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
89. "Intel to deliver first computer chip with two billion transistors". AFP. February 5, 2008. Archived from the original on May 20, 2011. Retrieved February 5, 2008.
90. "Intel Previews Intel Xeon 'Nehalem-EX' Processor." May 26, 2009. Retrieved on May 28, 2009.
91. Morgan, Timothy Prickett (November 21, 2011), "Fujitsu parades 16-core Sparc64 super stunner", The Register, retrieved December 8, 2011
92. Angelini, Chris (November 14, 2011). "Intel Core i7-3960X Review: Sandy Bridge-E And X79 Express". TomsHardware.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
93. "IDF2012 Mark Bohr, Intel Senior Fellow" (PDF).
94. "Images of SPARC64" (PDF). fujitsu.com. Retrieved August 29, 2017.
95. "Intel's Atom Architecture: The Journey Begins". AnandTech. Archived from the original on January 22, 2009. Retrieved April 4, 2010.
96. "Intel Xeon Phi SE10X". TechPowerUp. Retrieved July 20, 2015.
97. Shimpi, Lal. "The Haswell Review: Intel Core i7-4770K & i5-4670K Tested". anandtech. Archived from the original on June 7, 2013. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
98. "Dimmick, Frank (August 29, 2014). "Intel Core i7 5960X Extreme Edition Review". Overclockers Club. Retrieved August 29, 2014.
99. "Apple A8X". NotebookCheck. Retrieved July 20, 2015.
100. "Intel Readying 15-core Xeon E7 v2". AnandTech. Archived from the original on February 12, 2014. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
101. "Intel Xeon E5-2600 v3 Processor Overview: Haswell-EP Up to 18 Cores". pcper. September 8, 2014. Retrieved January 29, 2015.
102. "Intel's Broadwell-U arrives aboard 15W, 28W mobile processors". TechReport. January 5, 2015. Retrieved January 5, 2015.
103. "Oracle Cranks up the Cores to 32 with Sparc M7 Chip". EnterpriseTech. August 13, 2014.
104. "Broadwell-E: Intel Core i7-6950X, 6900K, 6850K & 6800K Review". Tom's Hardware. May 30, 2016. Retrieved April 12, 2017.
105. "The Broadwell-E Review". PC Gamer. July 8, 2016. Retrieved April 12, 2017.
106. "HUAWEI TO UNVEIL KIRIN 970 SOC WITH AI UNIT, 5.5 BILLION TRANSISTORS AND 1.2 GBPS LTE SPEED AT IFA 2017". firstpost.com. September 1, 2017. Retrieved November 18, 2018.
107. "Broadwell-EP Architecture - Intel Xeon E5-2600 v4 Broadwell-EP Review". Tom's Hardware. March 31, 2016. Retrieved April 4, 2016.
108. "About the ZipCPU". zipcpu.com. Retrieved September 10, 2019. As of ORCONF, 2016, the ZipCPU used between 1286 and 4926 6-LUTs, depending upon how it is configured.
109. "Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998)". NotebookCheck. Retrieved September 23, 2017.
110. Takahashi, Dean (January 3, 2017). "Qualcomm's Snapdragon 835 will debut with 3 billion transistors and a 10nm manufacturing process". VentureBeat.
111. Singh, Teja (2017). "3.2 Zen: A Next-Generation High-Performance x86 Core". Proc. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. pp. 52–54.
112. Cutress, Ian (February 22, 2017). "AMD Launches Zen". Anandtech.com. Archived from the original on February 22, 2017. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
113. "Ryzen 5 1600 - AMD". Wikichip.org. April 20, 2018. Retrieved December 9, 2018.
114. "Kirin 970 – HiSilicon". Wikichip. March 1, 2018. Retrieved November 8, 2018.
115. Leadbetter, Richard (April 6, 2017). "Inside the next Xbox: Project Scorpio tech revealed". Eurogamer. Retrieved May 3, 2017.
116. "Intel Xeon Platinum 8180". TechPowerUp. December 1, 2018. Retrieved December 2, 2018.
117. Pellerano, Stefano (March 2, 2022). "Circuit Design to Harness the Power of Scaling and Integration (ISSCC 2022)". YouTube.
118. Lee, Y. "SiFive Freedom SoCs : Industry's First Open Source RISC V Chips" (PDF). HotChips 29 IOT/Embedded. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 9, 2020. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
119. "Documents at Fujitsu" (PDF). fujitsu.com. Retrieved August 29, 2017.
120. Schmerer, Kai (November 5, 2018). "iPad Pro 2018: A12X-Prozessor bietet deutlich mehr Leistung". ZDNet.de (in German).
121. "Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies Announces Commercial Shipment of Qualcomm Centriq 2400 – The World's First 10nm Server Processor and Highest Performance Arm-based Server Processor Family Ever Designed". Qualcomm. Retrieved November 9, 2017.
122. "Qualcomm Snapdragon 1000 for laptops could pack 8.5 billion transistors". techradar. Retrieved September 23, 2017.
123. "Spotted: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Wafer on 7nm". AnandTech. Archived from the original on December 7, 2018. Retrieved December 6, 2018.
124. "HiSilicon Kirin 710". Notebookcheck. September 19, 2018. Retrieved November 24, 2018.
125. Yang, Daniel; Wegner, Stacy (September 21, 2018). "Apple iPhone Xs Max Teardown". TechInsights. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
126. "Apple's A12 Bionic is the first 7-nanometer smartphone chip". Engadget. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
127. "Kirin 980 – HiSilicon". Wikichip. November 8, 2018. Retrieved November 8, 2018.
128. "Qualcomm Snapdragon 8180: 7nm SoC SDM1000 With 8.5 Billion Transistors To Challenge Apple A12 Bionic Chipset". dailyhunt. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
129. Zafar, Ramish (October 30, 2018). "Apple's A12X Has 10 Billion Transistors, 90% Performance Boost & 7-Core GPU". Wccftech.
130. "Fujitsu began to produce Japan's billions of super-calculations with the strongest ARM processor A64FX". firstxw.com. April 16, 2019. Archived from the original on June 20, 2019. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
131. "Fujitsu Successfully Triples the Power Output of Gallium-Nitride Transistors". Fujitsu. August 22, 2018. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
132. "Hot Chips 30: Nvidia Xavier SoC". fuse.wikichip.org. September 18, 2018. Retrieved December 6, 2018.
133. Frumusanu, Andrei. "The Samsung Galaxy S10+ Snapdragon & Exynos Review: Almost Perfect, Yet So Flawed". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved February 19, 2021.
134. "Zen 2 Microarchitecture". WikiChip. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
135. "AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 3700X Review: Zen 2 and 7nm Unleashed". Tom's Hardware. July 7, 2019. Retrieved October 19, 2019.
136. Frumusanu, Andrei. "The Huawei Mate 30 Pro Review: Top Hardware without Google?". AnandTech. Archived from the original on January 2, 2020. Retrieved January 2, 2020.
137. Zafar, Ramish (September 10, 2019). "Apple A13 For iPhone 11 Has 8.5 Billion Transistors, Quad-Core GPU". Wccftech. Retrieved September 11, 2019.
138. Introducing iPhone 11 Pro — Apple Youtube Video, retrieved September 11, 2019^{[dead YouTube link]}
139. "Hot Chips 2020 Live Blog: IBM z15". AnandTech. August 17, 2020. Archived from the original on August 17, 2020.
140. Broekhuijsen, Niels (October 23, 2019). "AMD's 64-Core EPYC and Ryzen CPUs Stripped: A Detailed Inside Look". Retrieved October 24, 2019.
141. Mujtaba, Hassan (October 22, 2019). "AMD 2nd Gen EPYC Rome Processors Feature A Gargantuan 39.54 Billion Transistors, IO Die Pictured in Detail". Retrieved October 24, 2019.
142. Friedman, Alan (December 14, 2019). "5nm Kirin 1020 SoC tipped for next year's Huawei Mate 40 line". Phone Arena. Retrieved December 23, 2019.
143. Verheyde, Arne (December 5, 2019). "Amazon Compares 64-core ARM Graviton2 to Intel's Xeon". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved December 6, 2019.
144. Morgan, Timothy Prickett (December 3, 2019). "Finally: AWS Gives Servers A Real Shot In The Arm". The Next Platform. Retrieved December 6, 2019.
145. Friedman, Alan (October 10, 2019). "Qualcomm will reportedly introduce the Snapdragon 865 SoC as soon as next month". Phone Arena. Retrieved February 19, 2021.
146. "Xiaomi Mi 10 Teardown Analysis | TechInsights". www.techinsights.com. Retrieved February 19, 2021.
147. "The Linley Group - TI Jacinto Accelerates Level 3 ADAS". www.linleygroup.com. Retrieved February 12, 2021.
148. "Apple unveils A14 Bionic processor with 40% faster CPU and 11.8 billion transistors". Venturebeat. November 10, 2020. Retrieved November 24, 2020.
149. "Apple says new Arm-based M1 chip offers the 'longest battery life ever in a Mac'". The Verge. November 10, 2020. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
150. Ikoba, Jed John (October 23, 2020). "Multiple benchmark tests rank the Kirin 9000 as one of the most-powerful chipset yet". Gizmochina. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
151. Frumusanu, Andrei. "Huawei Announces Mate 40 Series: Powered by 15.3bn Transistors 5nm Kirin 9000". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
152. Burd, Thomas (2022). "2.7 Zen3: The AMD 2nd-Generation 7nm x86-64 Microprocessor Core". Proc. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. pp. 54–56.
153. "For a long time, Intel once again named the number of transistors in the chip. There are supposed to be about 6 billion for Rocket Lake-S. Coffee Lake-S is supposed to have about 4 billion. The chip with eight cores is about 30 % bigger than the predecessor with ten core". twitter. Retrieved March 16, 2021.
154. "Intel's Core i7-11700K 'Rocket Lake' Delidded: A Big Die, Revealed". tomshardware. March 12, 2021. Retrieved March 16, 2021.
155. "Intel's 14nm density". www.techcenturion.com. November 26, 2019. Retrieved November 26, 2019.
156. "AMD Ryzen 7 5800H Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved September 20, 2021.
157. "AMD Epyc 7763 specifications". August 2023.
158. Shankland, Stephen. "Apple's A15 Bionic chip powers iPhone 13 with 15 billion transistors, new graphics and AI". CNET. Retrieved September 20, 2021.
159. "Apple iPhone 13 Pro Teardown | TechInsights". www.techinsights.com. Retrieved September 29, 2021.
160. "Apple unveils M1 Pro and M1 Max chips for latest MacBook Pro laptops". VentureBeat. October 18, 2021.
161. "Apple Announces M1 Pro & M1 Max: Giant New Arm SoCs with All-Out Performance". AnanadTech. Archived from the original on October 18, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
162. "Apple unveils new computer chips amid shortage". BBC News. October 19, 2021.
163. "Apple Joins 3D-Fabric Portfolio with M1 Ultra?". TechInsights. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
164. "Hot Chips 2020 live blog". AnandTech. August 17, 2020. Archived from the original on August 17, 2020.
165. "Phantom X2 Series 5G powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9000". Mediatek. December 12, 2022.
166. "MediaTek Dimensity 9000". Mediatek. January 21, 2023.
167. "Apple A16 Bionic announced for the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max". NotebookCheck. September 7, 2022.
168. "iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max Only Models to Get New A16 Chip". CNET. September 7, 2022.
169. "The Apple 2022 Fall iPhone Event Live Blog". AnandTech. September 7, 2022. Archived from the original on September 8, 2022.
170. "Apple unveils M1 Ultra, the world's most powerful chip for a personal computer". Apple Newsroom. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
171. Shankland, Stephen. "Meet Apple's Enormous 20-Core M1 Ultra Processor, the Brains in the New Mac Studio Machine". CNET. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
172. "AMD releases Milan-X CPUs". AnandTech. March 21, 2022. Archived from the original on March 29, 2022.
173. "IBM Telum Hot Chips slide deck" (PDF). August 23, 2021.
174. "IBM z16 announcement". April 5, 2022.
175. "Apple unveils M2, taking the breakthrough performance and capabilities of M1 even further". Apple. June 6, 2022.
176. "MediaTek Dimensity 9200: New flagship chipset debuts with ARM Cortex-X3 CPU and Immortalis-G715 GPU cores built around TSMC N4P node". NotebookCheck. November 8, 2022.
177. "Dimensity 9200 specs". Mediatek. November 8, 2022.
178. "Dimensity 9200 presentation". Mediatek. November 8, 2022.
179. "AMD EPYC Genoa Gaps Intel Xeon in Stunning Fashion". ServeTheHome. November 10, 2022.
180. "AMD Aims to Break the ZettaFLOP Barrier by 2035, Lays Down Next-Gen Plans to Resolve Efficiency Problems". Appuals. February 21, 2023.
181. "AMD Lays The Path To Zettascale Computing: Talks CPU & GPU Performance Plus Efficiency Trends, Next-Gen Chiplet Packaging & More". WCCFtech. February 20, 2023.
182. "AMD EPYC Genoa & SP5 Platform Leaked – 5nm Zen 4 CCD Measures Roughly 72mm, 12 CCD Package at 5428mm2, Up To 700W Peak Socket Power". WCCFtech. August 17, 2021.
183. Syed, Areej (August 17, 2021). "Leaked AMD Epyc Genoa Docs Reveal 96 Cores, Max TDP of 700W, and Zen 4 Chiplet Dimensions". HardwareTimes.
184. "Kirin 9000S has about 6 billion fewer transistors than Kirin 9000, but its performance is stronger! How did you do it?". iNews. September 13, 2023. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
185. "Apple Announces M4 SoC: Latest and Greatest Starts on 2024 iPad Pro". Anandtech. May 7, 2024. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024.
186. "Apple introduces new M3 chip lineup, starting with the M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max". Arstechnica. October 31, 2023.
187. Goldman, Joshua. "Apple A17 Pro Chip: The New Brain Inside iPhone 15 Pro, Pro Max". CNET. Retrieved September 12, 2023.
188. "4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable Sapphire Rapids Leaps Forward". ServeTheHome. January 10, 2023.
189. "Wie vier Dies zu einem "monolithischen" Sapphire Rapids werden". hardwareLUXX. February 21, 2022.
190. "Apple unveils M2 Pro and M2 Max: next-generation chips for next-level workflows". Apple (Press release). January 17, 2023.
191. "Apple introduces M2 Ultra" (Press release). Apple. June 5, 2023.
192. "AMD EPYC Bergamo Launched 128 Cores Per Socket and 1024 Threads Per 1U". ServeTheHome. June 13, 2023.
193. "AMD Instinct MI300A Accelerators". AMD. Retrieved January 14, 2024.
194. Alcorn, Paul (December 6, 2023). "AMD unveils Instinct MI300X GPU and MI300A APU, claims up to 1.6X lead over Nvidia's competing GPUs". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved January 14, 2024.
195. "China creates world's thinnest chip with 5931 transistors". 2025.
196. Williams, Chris. "Nvidia's Tesla P100 has 15 billion transistors, 21TFLOPS". www.theregister.co.uk. Retrieved August 12, 2019.
197. "Famous Graphics Chips: NEC μPD7220 Graphics Display Controller". IEEE Computer Society. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. August 22, 2018. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
198. "GPU History: Hitachi ARTC HD63484. The second graphics processor". IEEE Computer Society. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. October 7, 2018. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
199. "Big Book of Amiga Hardware".
200. Russell, Jesse; Cohn, Ronald (May 2012). MOS Technology Agnus. Book on Demand. ISBN 978-5511916842.
201. "30 Years of Console Gaming". Klinger Photography. August 20, 2017. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
202. "Sega Saturn". MAME. Retrieved July 18, 2019.
203. "ASIC CHIPS ARE INDUSTRY'S GAME WINNERS". The Washington Post. September 18, 1995. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
204. "Is it Time to Rename the GPU?". Jon Peddie Research. IEEE Computer Society. July 9, 2018. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
205. "FastForward Sony Taps LSI Logic for PlayStation Video Game CPU Chip". FastForward. Retrieved January 29, 2014.
206. "Reality Co-Processor − The Power In Nintendo64" (PDF). Silicon Graphics. August 26, 1997. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 19, 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2019.
207. "Imagination PowerVR PCX2 GPU". VideoCardz.net. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
208. Lilly, Paul (May 19, 2009). "From Voodoo to GeForce: The Awesome History of 3D Graphics". PC Gamer. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
209. "3D accelerator database". Vintage 3D. Retrieved July 21, 2019.
210. "RIVA128 Datasheet". SGS Thomson Microelectronics. Retrieved July 21, 2019.
211. Singer, Graham (April 3, 2013). "History of the Modern Graphics Processor, Part 2". TechSpot. Retrieved July 21, 2019.
212. "Remembering the Sega Dreamcast". Bit-Tech. September 29, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2019.
213. Weinberg, Neil (September 7, 1998). "Comeback kid". Forbes. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
214. Charles, Bertie (1998). "Sega's New Dimension". Forbes. 162 (5–9). Forbes Incorporated: 206. The chip, etched in 0.25-micron detail — state-of-the-art for graphics processors — fits 10 million transistors
215. Hagiwara, Shiro; Oliver, Ian (November–December 1999). "Sega Dreamcast: Creating a Unified Entertainment World". IEEE Micro. 19 (6). IEEE Computer Society: 29–35. doi:10.1109/40.809375. Archived from the original on August 23, 2000. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
216. "VideoLogic Neon 250 4MB". VideoCardz.net. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
217. Shimpi, Anand Lal (November 21, 1998). "Fall Comdex '98 Coverage". AnandTech. Archived from the original on March 10, 2011. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
218. "EMOTION ENGINE AND GRAPHICS SYNTHESIZER USED IN THE CORE OF PLAYSTATION BECOME ONE CHIP" (PDF). Sony. April 21, 2003. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
219. "NVIDIA NV10 A3 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
220. IGN Staff (November 4, 2000). "Gamecube Versus PlayStation 2". IGN. Retrieved November 22, 2015.
221. "NVIDIA NV2A GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved July 21, 2019.
222. "ATI Xenos GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
223. International, GamesIndustry (July 14, 2005). "TSMC to manufacture X360 GPU". Eurogamer. Retrieved August 22, 2006.
224. "NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 65nm Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
225. "PS3 Graphics Chip Goes 65nm in Fall". Edge Online. June 26, 2008. Archived from the original on July 25, 2008.
226. "NVIDIA's 1.4 Billion Transistor GPU: GT200 Arrives as the GeForce GTX 280 & 260". AnandTech.com. Archived from the original on June 17, 2008. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
227. "The Radeon HD 4850 & 4870: AMD Wins at $199 and $299". AnandTech.com. Archived from the original on May 30, 2012. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
228. Glaskowsky, Peter. "ATI and Nvidia face off-obliquely". CNET. Archived from the original on January 27, 2012. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
229. Woligroski, Don (December 22, 2011). "AMD Radeon HD 7970". TomsHardware.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
230. "NVIDIA Kepler GK110 Architecture" (PDF). NVIDIA. 2012. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
231. Smith, Ryan (November 12, 2012). "NVIDIA Launches Tesla K20 & K20X: GK110 Arrives At Last". AnandTech. Archived from the original on November 13, 2012.
232. "Whitepaper: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680" (PDF). NVIDIA. 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 17, 2012.
233. Kan, Michael (August 18, 2020). "Xbox Series X May Give Your Wallet a Workout Due to High Chip Manufacturing Costs". PCMag. Retrieved September 5, 2020.
234. "AMD Xbox One GPU". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
235. "AMD PlayStation 4 GPU". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
236. "AMD Xbox One S GPU". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
237. "AMD PlayStation 4 Pro GPU". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
238. Smith, Ryan (June 29, 2016). "The AMD RX 480 Preview". Anandtech.com. Archived from the original on June 30, 2016. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
239. Schor, David (July 22, 2018). "VLSI 2018: GlobalFoundries 12nm Leading-Performance, 12LP". WikiChip Fuse. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
240. Harris, Mark (April 5, 2016). "Inside Pascal: NVIDIA's Newest Computing Platform". Nvidia developer blog.
241. "GPU Database: Pascal". TechPowerUp. July 26, 2023.
242. "AMD Xbox One X GPU". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
243. "Radeon's next-generation Vega architecture" (PDF).
244. Durant, Luke; Giroux, Olivier; Harris, Mark; Stam, Nick (May 10, 2017). "Inside Volta: The World's Most Advanced Data Center GPU". Nvidia developer blog.
245. "NVIDIA TURING GPU ARCHITECTURE: Graphics Reinvented" (PDF). Nvidia. 2018. Retrieved June 28, 2019.
246. "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
247. "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
248. "AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
249. "AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
250. "AMD Arcturus GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved November 10, 2022.
251. Walton, Jared (May 14, 2020). "Nvidia Unveils Its Next-Generation 7nm Ampere A100 GPU for Data Centers, and It's Absolutely Massive". Tom's Hardware.
252. "Nvidia Ampere Architecture". www.nvidia.com. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
253. "NVIDIA GA102 GPU Specs". Techpowerup. Retrieved September 5, 2020.
254. "'Giant Step into the Future': NVIDIA CEO Unveils GeForce RTX 30 Series GPUs". www.nvidia.com. September 2020. Retrieved September 5, 2020.
255. "NVIDIA GA103 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved March 21, 2023.
256. "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved September 20, 2021.
257. "NVIDIA GA106 specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
258. "NVIDIA GA107 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved March 21, 2023.
259. "MI250X die size estimates". Twitter. November 17, 2021.
260. "AMD Instinct MI250 Professional Graphics Card". VideoCardz. November 2, 2022.
261. "AMD's Instinct MI250X OAM Card Pictured: Aldebaran's Massive Die Revealed". Tom's Hardware. November 17, 2021.
262. "AMD MI250X and Toplogies Explained at HC34". ServeTheHome. August 22, 2022.
263. "Nvidia Launches Hopper H100 GPU, New DGXs and Grace Superchips". HPCWire. March 22, 2022. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
264. "NVIDIA details AD102 GPU, up to 18432 CUDA cores, 76.3B transistors and 608 mm²". VideoCardz. September 20, 2022.
265. "NVIDIA confirms Ada 102/103/104 GPU specs, AD104 has more transistors than GA102". VideoCardz. September 23, 2022.
266. "Alleged Nvidia AD106 and AD107 GPU Pics, Specs, Die Sizes Revealed". Tom's Hardware. February 3, 2023.
267. "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti "AD106-350" GPU Pictured, Uses Samsung GDDR6 Dies". WCCFtech. April 28, 2023.
268. "NVIDIA's Smallest Ada GPU, The AD107-400, For GeForce RTX 4060 GPUs Pictured". WCCFtech. May 21, 2023.
269. "AMD Unveils World's Most Advanced Gaming Graphics Cards, Built on Groundbreaking AMD RDNA 3 Architecture with Chiplet Design". AMD (Press release). November 3, 2022.
270. "AMD Announces the $999 Radeon RX 7900 XTX... (endnote RX-819)". TechPowerUp. November 4, 2022.
271. "AMD Navi 31 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved November 7, 2023.
272. "AMD Navi 32 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved November 7, 2023.
273. "AMD Navi 33 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved March 21, 2023.
274. "AMD Has a GPU to Rival Nvidia's H100". HPCWire. June 13, 2023. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
275. "AMD Aqua Vanjaram Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved January 14, 2024.
276. "NVIDIA Blackwell Platform Arrives to Power a New Era of Computing" (Press release). March 18, 2024.
277. "NVIDIA GB202 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
278. "NVIDIA GB203 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
279. "NVIDIA GB205 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
280. "NVIDIA GB206 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
281. "NVIDIA GB207 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
282. "AMD Navi 44 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
283. "AMD Navi 48 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
284. "Taiwan Company UMC Delivers 65nm FPGAs to Xilinx." SDA-ASIA Thursday, November 9, 2006.
285. ""Altera's new 40nm FPGAs — 2.5 billion transistors!". pldesignline.com. Archived from the original on June 19, 2010. Retrieved January 22, 2009.
286. "Design of a High-Density SoC FPGA at 20nm" (PDF). 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 23, 2016. Retrieved July 16, 2017.
287. Maxfield, Clive (October 2011). "New Xilinx Virtex-7 2000T FPGA provides equivalent of 20 million ASIC gates". EETimes. AspenCore. Retrieved September 4, 2019.
288. Greenhill, D.; Ho, R.; Lewis, D.; Schmit, H.; Chan, K. H.; Tong, A.; Atsatt, S.; How, D.; McElheny, P. (February 2017). "3.3 a 14nm 1GHz FPGA with 2.5D transceiver integration". 2017 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC). pp. 54–55. doi:10.1109/ISSCC.2017.7870257. ISBN 978-1-5090-3758-2. S2CID 2135354.
289. Greenhill, David; Ho, Ron; Lewis, David; Schmit, Herman; Chan, Kok Hong; Tong, Andy; Atsatt, Sean; How, Dana; McElheny, Peter; Duwel, Keith; Schulz, Jeffrey; Faulkner, Darren; Iyer, Gopal; Chen, George; Phoon, Hee Kong; Lim, Han Wooi; Koay, Wei-Yee; Garibay, Ty (May 17, 2017). "3.3 A 14nm 1GHz FPGA with 2.5D transceiver integration | DeepDyve". DeepDyve. Archived from the original on May 17, 2017. Retrieved September 19, 2019.
290. Santarini, Mike (May 2014). "Xilinx Ships Industry's First 20-nm All Programmable Devices" (PDF). Xcell journal. No. 86. Xilinx. p. 14. Retrieved June 3, 2014.
291. Gianelli, Silvia (January 2015). "Xilinx Delivers the Industry's First 4M Logic Cell Device, Offering >50M Equivalent ASIC Gates and 4X More Capacity than Competitive Alternatives". www.xilinx.com. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
292. Sims, Tara (August 2019). "Xilinx Announces the World's Largest FPGA Featuring 9 Million System Logic Cells". www.xilinx.com. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
293. Verheyde, Arne (August 2019). "Xilinx Introduces World's Largest FPGA With 35 Billion Transistors". www.tomshardware.com. Retrieved August 23, 2019.
294. Cutress, Ian (August 2019). "Xilinx Announces World Largest FPGA: Virtex Ultrascale+ VU19P with 9m Cells". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on August 27, 2019. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
295. Abazovic, Fuad (May 2019). "Xilinx 7nm Versal taped out last year". Retrieved September 30, 2019.
296. Cutress, Ian (August 2019). "Hot Chips 31 Live Blogs: Xilinx Versal AI Engine". Archived from the original on August 20, 2019. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
297. Krewell, Kevin (August 2019). "Hot Chips 2019 highlights new AI strategies". Retrieved September 30, 2019.
298. Leibson, Steven (November 6, 2019). "Intel announces Intel Stratix 10 GX 10M FPGA, worlds highest capacity with 10.2 million logic elements". Retrieved November 7, 2019.
299. Verheyde, Arne (November 6, 2019). "Intel Introduces World's Largest FPGA With 43.3 Billion Transistors". Retrieved November 7, 2019.
300. Cutress, Ian (August 2020). "Hot Chips 2020 Live Blog: Xilinx Versal ACAPs". Archived from the original on August 18, 2020. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
301. "Xilinx Announces Full Production Shipments of 7nm Versal AI Core and Versal Prime Series Devices". April 27, 2021. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
302. The DRAM memory of Robert Dennard history-computer.com
303. "Late 1960s: Beginnings of MOS memory" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. January 23, 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
304. "1970: Semiconductors compete with magnetic cores". Computer History Museum. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
305. "2.1.1 Flash Memory". TU Wien. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
306. Shilov, Anton. "SK Hynix Starts Production of 128-Layer 4D NAND, 176-Layer Being Developed". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on June 26, 2019. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
307. "Samsung Begins Production of 100+ Layer Sixth-Generation V-NAND Flash". PC Perspective. August 11, 2019. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
308. "1966: Semiconductor RAMs Serve High-speed Storage Needs". Computer History Museum. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
309. "Specifications for Toshiba "TOSCAL" BC-1411". Old Calculator Web Museum. Archived from the original on July 3, 2017. Retrieved May 8, 2018.
310. "Toshiba "Toscal" BC-1411 Desktop Calculator". Old Calculator Web Museum. Archived from the original on May 20, 2007.
311. Castrucci, Paul (May 10, 1966). "IBM first in IC memory" (PDF). IBM News. Vol. 3, no. 9. IBM Corporation. Retrieved June 19, 2019 – via Computer History Museum.
312. "A chronological list of Intel products. The products are sorted by date" (PDF). Intel museum. Intel Corporation. July 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 9, 2007. Retrieved July 31, 2007.
313. "1970s: SRAM evolution" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
314. Pimbley, J. (2012). Advanced CMOS Process Technology. Elsevier. p. 7. ISBN 9780323156806.
315. "Intel: 35 Years of Innovation (1968–2003)" (PDF). Intel. 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 4, 2021. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
316. Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 362–363. ISBN 9783540342588. The i1103 was manufactured on a 6-mask silicon-gate P-MOS process with 8 μm minimum features. The resulting product had a 2,400 μm² memory cell size, a die size just under 10 mm², and sold for around $21.
317. "Manufacturers in Japan enter the DRAM market and integration densities are improved" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
318. Gealow, Jeffrey Carl (August 10, 1990). "Impact of Processing Technology on DRAM Sense Amplifier Design" (PDF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. pp. 149–166. Retrieved June 25, 2019 – via CORE.
319. "Silicon Gate MOS 2102A". Intel. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
320. "One of the Most Successful 16K Dynamic RAMs: The 4116". National Museum of American History. Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
321. Component Data Catalog (PDF). Intel. 1978. pp. 3–94. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
322. "Memory". STOL (Semiconductor Technology Online). Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
323. "The Cutting Edge of IC Technology: The First 294,912-Bit (288K) Dynamic RAM". National Museum of American History. Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
324. "Computer History for 1984". Computer Hope. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
325. "Japanese Technical Abstracts". Japanese Technical Abstracts. 2 (3–4). University Microfilms: 161. 1987. The announcement of 1M DRAM in 1984 began the era of megabytes.
326. "KM48SL2000-7 Datasheet". Samsung. August 1992. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
327. "Electronic Design". Electronic Design. 41 (15–21). Hayden Publishing Company. 1993. The first commercial synchronous DRAM, the Samsung 16-Mbit KM48SL2000, employs a single-bank architecture that lets system designers easily transition from asynchronous to synchronous systems.
328. Breaking the gigabit barrier, DRAMs at ISSCC portend major system-design impact. (dynamic random access memory; International Solid-State Circuits Conference; Hitachi Ltd. and NEC Corp. research and development), January 9, 1995
329. "Japanese Company Profiles" (PDF). Smithsonian Institution. 1996. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
330. "History: 1990s". SK Hynix. Archived from the original on February 5, 2021. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
331. "Samsung 50nm 2GB DDR3 chips are industry's smallest". SlashGear. September 29, 2008. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
332. Shilov, Anton (July 19, 2017). "Samsung Increases Production Volumes of 8 GB HBM2 Chips Due to Growing Demand". AnandTech. Archived from the original on July 20, 2017. Retrieved June 29, 2019.
333. "Samsung Unleashes a Roomy DDR4 256GB RAM". Tom's Hardware. September 6, 2018. Archived from the original on June 21, 2019. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
334. "First 3D Nanotube and RRAM ICs Come Out of Foundry". IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News. July 19, 2019. Retrieved September 16, 2019. This wafer was made just last Friday... and it's the first monolithic 3D IC ever fabricated within a foundry
335. "Three Dimensional Monolithic System-on-a-Chip". www.darpa.mil. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
336. "DARPA 3DSoC Initiative Completes First Year, Update Provided at ERI Summit on Key Steps Achieved to Transfer Technology into SkyWater's 200mm U.S. Foundry". Skywater Technology Foundry (Press release). July 25, 2019. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
337. "DD28F032SA Datasheet". Intel. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
338. "TOSHIBA ANNOUNCES 0.13 MICRON 1Gb MONOLITHIC NAND FEATURING LARGE BLOCK SIZE FOR IMPROVED WRITE/ERASE SPEED PERFORMANCE". Toshiba. September 9, 2002. Archived from the original on March 11, 2006. Retrieved March 11, 2006.
339. "TOSHIBA AND SANDISK INTRODUCE A ONE GIGABIT NAND FLASH MEMORY CHIP, DOUBLING CAPACITY OF FUTURE FLASH PRODUCTS". Toshiba. November 12, 2001. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
340. "Our Proud Heritage from 2000 to 2009". Samsung Semiconductor. Samsung. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
341. "TOSHIBA ANNOUNCES 1 GIGABYTE COMPACTFLASH CARD". Toshiba. September 9, 2002. Archived from the original on March 11, 2006. Retrieved March 11, 2006.
342. "History". Samsung Electronics. Samsung. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
343. "TOSHIBA COMMERCIALIZES INDUSTRY'S HIGHEST CAPACITY EMBEDDED NAND FLASH MEMORY FOR MOBILE CONSUMER PRODUCTS". Toshiba. April 17, 2007. Archived from the original on November 23, 2010. Retrieved November 23, 2010.
344. "Toshiba Launches the Largest Density Embedded NAND Flash Memory Devices". Toshiba. August 7, 2008. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
345. "Toshiba Launches Industry's Largest Embedded NAND Flash Memory Modules". Toshiba. June 17, 2010. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
346. "Samsung e·MMC Product family" (PDF). Samsung Electronics. December 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 8, 2019. Retrieved July 15, 2019.
347. Shilov, Anton (December 5, 2017). "Samsung Starts Production of 512 GB UFS NAND Flash Memory: 64-Layer V-NAND, 860 MB/s Reads". AnandTech. Archived from the original on December 5, 2017. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
348. Manners, David (January 30, 2019). "Samsung makes 1TB flash eUFS module". Electronics Weekly. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
349. Tallis, Billy (October 17, 2018). "Samsung Shares SSD Roadmap for QLC NAND And 96-layer 3D NAND". AnandTech. Archived from the original on October 18, 2018. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
350. "Micron's 232 Layer NAND Now Shipping". AnandTech. July 26, 2022. Archived from the original on July 27, 2022.
351. "232-Layer NAND". Micron. Retrieved October 17, 2022.
352. "First to Market, Second to None: the World's First 232-Layer NAND". Micron. July 26, 2022.
353. "Comparison: Latest 3D NAND Products from YMTC, Samsung, SK hynix and Micron". TechInsights. January 11, 2023.
354. Han-Way Huang (December 5, 2008). Embedded System Design with C805. Cengage Learning. p. 22. ISBN 978-1-111-81079-5. Archived from the original on April 27, 2018.
355. Marie-Aude Aufaure; Esteban Zimányi (January 17, 2013). Business Intelligence: Second European Summer School, eBISS 2012, Brussels, Belgium, July 15-21, 2012, Tutorial Lectures. Springer. p. 136. ISBN 978-3-642-36318-4. Archived from the original on April 27, 2018.
356. "1965: Semiconductor Read-Only-Memory Chips Appear". Computer History Museum. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
357. "1971: Reusable semiconductor ROM introduced". The Storage Engine. Computer History Museum. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
358. Iizuka, H.; Masuoka, F.; Sato, Tai; Ishikawa, M. (1976). "Electrically alterable avalanche-injection-type MOS READ-ONLY memory with stacked-gate structure". IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 23 (4): 379–387. Bibcode:1976ITED...23..379I. doi:10.1109/T-ED.1976.18415. ISSN 0018-9383. S2CID 30491074.
359. μCOM-43 SINGLE CHIP MICROCOMPUTER: USERS' MANUAL (PDF). NEC Microcomputers. January 1978. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
360. "2716: 16K (2K x 8) UV ERASABLE PROM" (PDF). Intel. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 13, 2020. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
361. "1982 CATALOG" (PDF). NEC Electronics. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
362. Component Data Catalog (PDF). Intel. 1978. pp. 1–3. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
363. "27256 Datasheet" (PDF). Intel. Retrieved July 2, 2019.
364. "History of Fujitsu's Semiconductor Business". Fujitsu. Retrieved July 2, 2019.
365. "D27512-30 Datasheet" (PDF). Intel. Retrieved July 2, 2019.
366. "A Computer Pioneer Rediscovered, 50 Years On". The New York Times. April 20, 1994. Archived from the original on November 4, 2016.
367. "History of Computers and Computing, Birth of the modern computer, Relays computer, George Stibitz". history-computer.com. Retrieved August 22, 2019. Initially the 'Complex Number Computer' performed only complex multiplication and division, but later a simple modification enabled it to add and subtract as well. It used about 400-450 binary relays, 6-8 panels, and ten multiposition, multipole relays called "crossbars" for temporary storage of numbers.
368. "1953: Transistorized Computers Emerge". Computer History Museum. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
369. "ETL Mark III Transistor-Based Computer". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
370. "Brief History". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
371. "1962: Aerospace systems are first the applications for ICs in computers | The Silicon Engine | Computer History Museum". www.computerhistory.org. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
372. "PDP-8 (Straight 8) Computer Functional Restoration". www.pdp8.net. Retrieved August 22, 2019. backplanes contain 230 cards, approximately 10,148 diodes, 1409 transistors, 5615 resistors, and 1674 capacitors
373. "IBM 608 calculator". IBM. January 23, 2003. Retrieved March 8, 2021.
374. "【NEC】 NEAC-2201". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
375. "【Hitachi and Japanese National Railways】 MARS-1". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
376. The IBM 7070 Data Processing System. Avery et al. (page 167)
377. "【Matsushita Electric Industrial】 MADIC-I transistor-based computer". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
378. "【NEC】 NEAC-2203". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
379. "【Toshiba】 TOSBAC-2100". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
380. 7090 Data Processing System
381. Luigi Logrippo."My first two computers: Elea 9003 and Elea 6001: Memories of a 'bare-metal' programmer".
382. "【Mitsubishi Electric】 MELCOM 1101". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
383. Erich Bloch (1959). The Engineering Design of the Stretch Computer (PDF). Eastern Joint Computer Conference.
384. "【NEC】NEAC-L2". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
385. Thornton, James (1970). Design of a Computer: the Control Data 6600. p. 20.
386. "Digital Equipment PDP-8/S".
387. "The PDP-8/S - an exercise in cost reduction"
388. "PDP-8/S"
389. "The Digital Equipment Corporation PDP-8: Models and Options: The PDP-8/I".
390. James F. O'Loughlin."PDP-8/I: bigger on the inside yet smaller on the outside".
391. Jan M. Rabaey, Digital Integrated Circuits, Fall 2001: Course Notes, Chapter 6: Designing Combinatorial Logic Gates in CMOS, retrieved October 27, 2012.
392. Richard F. Tinder (January 2000). Engineering Digital Design. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-691295-1.
393. Engineers, Institute of Electrical Electronics (2000). 100-2000 (7th ed.). doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.2000.322230. ISBN 978-0-7381-2601-2. IEEE Std 100-2000.
394. Smith, Kevin (August 11, 1983). "Image processor handles 256 pixels simultaneously". Electronics.
395. Kanellos, Michael (February 9, 2005). "Cell chip: Hit or hype?". CNET News. Archived from the original on October 25, 2012.
396. Kennedy, Patrick (June 2019). "Hands-on With a Graphcore C2 IPU PCIe Card at Dell Tech World". servethehome.com. Retrieved December 29, 2019.
397. "Colossus – Graphcore". en.wikichip.org. Retrieved December 29, 2019.
398. Graphcore. "IPU Technology". www.graphcore.ai.
399. "Cerebras Unveils 2nd Gen Wafer Scale Engine: 850,000 Cores, 2.6 Trillion Transistors - ExtremeTech". www.extremetech.com. April 21, 2021. Retrieved April 22, 2021.
400. "Cerebras Wafer Scale Engine WSE-2 and CS-2 at Hot Chips 34". ServeTheHome. August 23, 2022.
401. "NVIDIA NVLink4 NVSwitch at Hot Chips 34". ServeTheHome. August 22, 2022.
402. Schor, David (April 6, 2019). "TSMC Starts 5-Nanometer Risk Production". WikiChip Fuse. Retrieved April 7, 2019.
403. "1960: Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) Transistor Demonstrated". Computer History Museum. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
404. Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 321–3. ISBN 9783540342588.
405. "1963: Complementary MOS Circuit Configuration is Invented". Computer History Museum. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
406. "1964: First Commercial MOS IC Introduced". Computer History Museum. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
407. Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 330. ISBN 9783540342588.
408. Lambrechts, Wynand; Sinha, Saurabh; Abdallah, Jassem Ahmed; Prinsloo, Jaco (2018). Extending Moore's Law through Advanced Semiconductor Design and Processing Techniques. CRC Press. p. 59. ISBN 9781351248655.
409. Belzer, Jack; Holzman, Albert G.; Kent, Allen (1978). Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology: Volume 10 – Linear and Matrix Algebra to Microorganisms: Computer-Assisted Identification. CRC Press. p. 402. ISBN 9780824722609.
410. "Intel Microprocessor Quick Reference Guide". Intel. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
411. "1978: Double-well fast CMOS SRAM (Hitachi)" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
412. "0.18-micron Technology". TSMC. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
413. 65nm CMOS Process Technology
414. Diefendorff, Keith (15 November 1999). "Hal Makes Sparcs Fly". Microprocessor Report, Volume 13, Number 5.
415. Cutress, Ian. "Intel's 10nm Cannon Lake and Core i3-8121U Deep Dive Review". AnandTech. Archived from the original on January 30, 2019. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
416. "Samsung Shows Industry's First 2-Gigabit DDR2 SDRAM". Samsung Semiconductor. Samsung. September 20, 2004. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
417. Williams, Martyn (July 12, 2004). "Fujitsu, Toshiba begin 65nm chip trial production". InfoWorld. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
418. Elpida's presentation at Via Technology Forum 2005 and Elpida 2005 Annual Report
419. "Fujitsu Introduces World-class 65-Nanometer Process Technology for Advanced Server, Mobile Applications". Archived from the original on September 27, 2011. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
420. "Intel Now Packs 100 Million Transistors in Each Square Millimeter". IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News. March 30, 2017. Retrieved November 14, 2018.
421. "40nm Technology". TSMC. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
422. "Toshiba Makes Major Advances in NAND Flash Memory with 3-bit-per-cell 32nm generation and with 4-bit-per-cell 43nm technology". Toshiba. February 11, 2009. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
423. "History: 2010s". SK Hynix. Archived from the original on April 29, 2021. Retrieved July 8, 2019.
424. Shimpi, Anand Lal (June 8, 2012). "SandForce Demos 19nm Toshiba & 20nm IMFT NAND Flash". AnandTech. Archived from the original on June 9, 2012. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
425. Schor, David (April 16, 2019). "TSMC Announces 6-Nanometer Process". WikiChip Fuse. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
426. "16/12nm Technology". TSMC. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
427. "VLSI 2018: Samsung's 8nm 8LPP, a 10nm extension". WikiChip Fuse. July 1, 2018. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
428. "Samsung Mass Producing 128Gb 3-bit MLC NAND Flash". Tom's Hardware. April 11, 2013. Archived from the original on June 21, 2019. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
429. "10nm Technology". TSMC. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
430. "Can TSMC maintain their process technology lead". SemiWiki. April 29, 2020.
431. Jones, Scotten (May 3, 2019). "TSMC and Samsung 5nm Comparison". Semiwiki. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
432. Nenni, Daniel (January 2, 2019). "Samsung vs TSMC 7nm Update". Semiwiki. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
433. "7nm Technology". TSMC. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
434. Schor, David (June 15, 2018). "A Look at Intel's 10nm Std Cell as TechInsights Reports on the i3-8121U, finds Ruthenium". WikiChip Fuse. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
435. "Samsung Foundry update 2019". SemiWiki. August 6, 2019.
436. Jones, Scotten (June 25, 2018), 7nm, 5nm and 3nm Logic, current and projected processes
437. Shilov, Anton. "Samsung Completes Development of 5nm EUV Process Technology". AnandTech. Archived from the original on April 18, 2019. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
438. "Samsung Foundry Innovations Power the Future of Big Data, AI/ML and Smart, Connected Devices". October 7, 2021.
439. "Qualcomm confirms Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is made using Samsung's 4nm process". December 2, 2021.
440. Wilde, Damien (January 14, 2022). "List of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 smartphones available since December 2021". 9to5Google.
441. "TSMC Extends Its 5nm Family With A New Enhanced-Performance N4P Node". WikiChip. October 26, 2021.
442. "MediaTek Launches Dimensity 9000 built on TSMC N4 process". December 16, 2021.
443. "TSMC Expands Advanced Technology Leadership with N4P Process (press release)". TSMC. October 26, 2021.
444. Armasu, Lucian (January 11, 2019), "Samsung Plans Mass Production of 3nm GAAFET Chips in 2021", www.tomshardware.com
445. "Samsung Starts 3nm Production: The Gate-All-Around (GAAFET) Era Begins". AnandTech. June 30, 2022. Archived from the original on July 2, 2022.
446. "TSMC Plans New Fab for 3nm". EE Times. December 12, 2016. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
447. "TSMC Roadmap Update: 3nm in Q1 2023, 3nm Enhanced in 2024, 2nm in 2025". www.anandtech.com. October 18, 2021. Archived from the original on October 18, 2021.
448. "TSMC Introduces N4X Process (press release)". TSMC. December 16, 2021.
449. "The Future Is Now (blog post)". TSMC. December 16, 2021.
450. "TSMC Unveils N4X Node". AnandTech. December 17, 2021. Archived from the original on May 25, 2022.
451. "TSMC roadmap update". AnandTech. April 22, 2022. Archived from the original on April 25, 2022.
452. Smith, Ryan (June 13, 2022). "Intel 4 Process Node In Detail: 2x Density Scaling, 20% Improved Performance". AnandTech. Archived from the original on June 13, 2022.
453. Alcorn, Paul (March 24, 2021). "Intel Fixes 7nm, Meteor Lake and Granite Rapids Coming in 2023". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved June 1, 2021.
454. Cutress, Dr Ian. "Intel's Process Roadmap to 2025: with 4nm, 3nm, 20A and 18A?!". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on July 26, 2021. Retrieved July 27, 2021.
455. Cutress, Dr Ian (February 17, 2022). "Intel Discloses Multi-Generation Xeon Scalable Roadmap: New E-Core Only Xeons in 2024". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on February 17, 2022.
456. "Samsung Electronics Unveils Plans for 1.4nm Process Technology and Investment for Production Capacity at Samsung Foundry Forum 2022". Samsung Global Newsroom. October 4, 2022.
457. Wecker, Dave; Bauer, Bela; Clark, Bryan K.; Hastings, Matthew B.; Troyer, Matthias (2014). "Gate-count estimates for performing quantum chemistry on small quantum computers". Physical Review A. 90 (2) 022305. arXiv:1312.1695. Bibcode:2014PhRvA..90b2305W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.022305.
458. Does gate count matter? Hardware efficiency of logic-minimization techniques for cryptographic primitives
459. Sarmento, Jose; Stonick, John T. (2010). "A minimal-gate-count fully digital frequency-tracking oversampling CDR circuit". Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. pp. 2099–2102. doi:10.1109/ISCAS.2010.5537061. ISBN 978-1-4244-5308-5.
460. Ghoniem, Omar; Elsayed, Hatem; Soubra, Hassan (2023). "Quantum Gate Count Analysis". 2023 Eleventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS). pp. 190–197. doi:10.1109/ICICIS58388.2023.10391119. ISBN 979-8-3503-2208-8.

External links

[edit]

• Transistor counts of Intel processors
• Evolution of FPGA Architecture

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transistor_count&oldid=1321236810"

• This page was last edited on 9 November 2025, at 13:26 (UTC).
• Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

• Privacy policy
• About Wikipedia
• Disclaimers
• Contact Wikipedia
• Legal & safety contacts
• Code of Conduct
• Developers
• Statistics
• Cookie statement
• Mobile view

• 
• 

Search

Search

Toggle the table of contents

Transistor count

7 languagesAdd topic

Number of transistors in a device

The transistor count is the number of transistors in an electronic device (typically on a single substrate or silicon die). It is the most common measure of integrated circuit complexity (although the majority of transistors in modern microprocessors are contained in cache memories, which consist mostly of the same memory cell circuits replicated many times). The rate at which MOS transistor counts have increased generally follows Moore's law, which observes that transistor count doubles approximately every two years. However, being directly proportional to the area of a die, transistor count does not represent how advanced the corresponding manufacturing technology is. A better indication of this is transistor density which is the ratio of a semiconductor's transistor count to its die area.

Records

As of 2023^[update], the highest transistor count in flash memory is Micron's 2 terabyte (3D-stacked) 16-die, 232-layer V-NAND flash memory chip, with 5.3 trillion floating-gate MOSFETs (3 bits per transistor).

The highest transistor count in a single chip processor as of 2020^[update] is that of the deep learning processor Wafer Scale Engine 2 by Cerebras. It has 2.6 trillion MOSFETs in 84 exposed fields (dies) on a wafer, manufactured using TSMC's 7 nm FinFET process.^{[1][2][3][4][5]}

As of 2024^[update], the GPU with the highest transistor count is Nvidia's Blackwell-based B100 accelerator, built on TSMC's custom 4NP process node and totaling 208 billion MOSFETs.

The highest transistor count in a consumer microprocessor as of March 2025^[update] is 184 billion transistors, in Apple's ARM-based dual-die M3 Ultra SoC, which is fabricated using TSMC's 3 nm semiconductor manufacturing process.^{[citation needed]}

Year	Component	Name	Number of MOSFETs (in trillions)	Remarks
2022	Flash memory	Micron's V-NAND module	5.3	stacked package of sixteen 232-layer 3D NAND dies
2020	any processor	Wafer Scale Engine 2	2.6	wafer-scale design of 84 exposed fields (dies)
2024	GPU	Nvidia B100	0.208	Uses two reticle limit dies, with 104 billion transistors each, joined and acting as a single large monolithic piece of silicon
2025	Microprocessor (consumer)	Apple M3 Ultra	0.184	SoC using two dies joined with a high-speed bridge
2020	DLP	Colossus Mk2 GC200	0.059	An IPU[a] (Intelligence Processing Unit) in contrast to CPU and GPU

In terms of computer systems that consist of numerous integrated circuits, the supercomputer with the highest transistor count as of 2016^[update] was the Chinese-designed Sunway TaihuLight, which has for all CPUs/nodes combined "about 400 trillion transistors in the processing part of the hardware" and "the DRAM includes about 12 quadrillion transistors, and that's about 97 percent of all the transistors."^[6] To compare, the smallest computer, as of 2018^[update] dwarfed by a grain of rice, had on the order of 100,000 transistors. Early experimental solid-state computers had as few as 130 transistors but used large amounts of diode logic. The first carbon nanotube computer had 178 transistors and was a 1-bit one-instruction set computer, while a later one is 16-bit (its instruction set is 32-bit RISC-V though).

Ionic transistor chips ("water-based" analog limited processor), have up to hundreds of such transistors.^[7]

Estimates of the total numbers of transistors manufactured:

• Up to 2014: 2.9×10²¹
• Up to 2018: 1.3×10^22[8][9]

Transistor count

Plot of MOS transistor counts for microprocessors against dates of in­tro­duction. The curve shows counts doubling every two years, per Moore's law.

Microprocessors

A microprocessor incorporates the functions of a computer's central processing unit on a single integrated circuit. It is a multi-purpose, programmable device that accepts digital data as input, processes it according to instructions stored in its memory, and provides results as output.

The development of MOS integrated circuit technology in the 1960s led to the development of the first microprocessors.^[10] The 20-bit MP944, developed by Garrett AiResearch for the U.S. Navy's F-14 Tomcat fighter in 1970, is considered by its designer Ray Holt to be the first microprocessor.^[11] It was a multi-chip microprocessor, fabricated on six MOS chips. However, it was classified by the Navy until 1998. The 4-bit Intel 4004, released in 1971, was the first single-chip microprocessor.

Modern microprocessors typically include on-chip cache memories. The number of transistors used for these cache memories typically far exceeds the number of transistors used to implement the logic of the microprocessor (that is, excluding the cache). For example, the last DEC Alpha chip uses 90% of its transistors for cache.^[12]

Processor	Transistor count	Year	Designer	Process (nm)	Area (mm2)	Transistor density (tr./mm2)
MP944 (20-bit, 6-chip, 28 chips total)	74,442 (5,360 excl. ROM & RAM)[13][14]	1970[11][b]	Garrett AiResearch	?	?	?
Intel 4004 (4-bit, 16-pin)	2,250	1971	Intel	10,000 nm	12 mm2	188
TMX 1795 (8-bit, 24-pin)	3,078[15]	1971	Texas Instruments	?	30.64 mm2	100.5
Intel 8008 (8-bit, 18-pin)	3,500	1972	Intel	10,000 nm	14 mm2	250
NEC μCOM-4 (4-bit, 42-pin)	2,500[16][17]	1973	NEC	7,500 nm[18]	?	?
Toshiba TLCS-12 (12-bit)	11,000+[19]	1973	Toshiba	6,000 nm	32.45 mm2	340+
Intel 4040 (4-bit, 16-pin)	3,000	1974	Intel	10,000 nm	12 mm2	250
Motorola 6800 (8-bit, 40-pin)	4,100	1974	Motorola	6,000 nm	16 mm2	256
Intel 8080 (8-bit, 40-pin)	6,000	1974	Intel	6,000 nm	20 mm2	300
TMS 1000 (4-bit, 28-pin)	8,000[c]	1974[20]	Texas Instruments	8,000 nm	11 mm2	730
HP Nanoprocessor (8-bit, 40-pin)	4639[d][21]	1974	Hewlett-Packard	?	19 mm2	?
MOS Technology 6502 (8-bit, 40-pin)	4,528[e][22]	1975	MOS Technology	8,000 nm	21 mm2	216
Intersil IM6100 (12-bit, 40-pin; clone of PDP-8)	4,000	1975	Intersil	?	?	?
CDP 1801 (8-bit, 2-chip, 40-pin)	5,000	1975	RCA	?	?	?
RCA 1802 (8-bit, 40-pin)	5,000	1976	RCA	5,000 nm	27 mm2	185
Zilog Z80 (8-bit, 4-bit ALU, 40-pin)	8,500[f]	1976	Zilog	4,000 nm	18 mm2	470
Intel 8085 (8-bit, 40-pin)	6,500	1976	Intel	3,000 nm	20 mm2	325
TMS9900 (16-bit)	8,000	1976	Texas Instruments	?	?	?
Bellmac-8 (8-bit)	7,000	1977	Bell Labs	5,000 nm	?	?
Motorola 6809 (8-bit with some 16-bit features, 40-pin)	9,000	1978	Motorola	5,000 nm	21 mm2	430
Intel 8086 (16-bit, 40-pin)	29,000[23]	1978	Intel	3,000 nm	33 mm2	880
Zilog Z8000 (16-bit)	17,500[24]	1979	Zilog	5,000-6,000 nm (design rules)	39.31 mm2 (238x256 mil2)	445
Intel 8088 (16-bit, 8-bit data bus)	29,000	1979	Intel	3,000 nm	33 mm2	880
Motorola 68000 (16/32-bit, 32-bit registers, 16-bit ALU)	68,000[25]	1979	Motorola	3,500 nm	44 mm2	1,550
Intel 8051 (8-bit, 40-pin)	50,000	1980	Intel	?	?	?
WDC 65C02	11,500[26]	1981	WDC	3,000 nm	6 mm2	1,920
ROMP (32-bit)	45,000	1981	IBM	2,000 nm	58.52 mm2	770
Intel 80186 (16-bit, 68-pin)	55,000	1982	Intel	3,000 nm	60 mm2	920
Intel 80286 (16-bit, 68-pin)	134,000	1982	Intel	1,500 nm	49 mm2	2,730
WDC 65C816 (8/16-bit)	22,000[27]	1983	WDC	3,000 nm[28]	9 mm2	2,400
NEC V20	63,000	1984	NEC	?	?	?
Motorola 68020 (32-bit; 114 pins used)	190,000[29]	1984	Motorola	2,000 nm	85 mm2	2,200
Intel 80386 (32-bit, 132-pin; no cache)	275,000	1985	Intel	1,500 nm	104 mm2	2,640
ARM 1 (32-bit; no cache)	25,000[29]	1985	Acorn	3,000 nm	50 mm2	500
Novix NC4016 (16-bit)	16,000[30]	1985[31]	Harris Corporation	3,000 nm[32]	?	?
SPARC MB86900 (32-bit; no cache)	110,000[33]	1986	Fujitsu	1,200 nm	?	?
NEC V60[34] (32-bit; no cache)	375,000	1986	NEC	1,500 nm	?	?
ARM 2 (32-bit, 84-pin; no cache)	27,000[35][29]	1986	Acorn	2,000 nm	30.25 mm2	890
Z80000 (32-bit; very small cache)	91,000	1986	Zilog	?	?	?
NEC V70[34] (32-bit; no cache)	385,000	1987	NEC	1,500 nm	?	?
Hitachi Gmicro/200[36]	730,000	1987	Hitachi	1,000 nm	?	?
Motorola 68030 (32-bit, very small caches)	273,000	1987	Motorola	800 nm	102 mm2	2,680
TI Explorer's 32-bit Lisp machine chip	553,000[37]	1987	Texas Instruments	2,000 nm[38]	?	?
DEC WRL MultiTitan	180,000[39]	1988	DEC WRL	1,500 nm	61 mm2	2,950
Intel i960 (32-bit, 33-bit memory subsystem, no cache)	250,000[40]	1988	Intel	1,500 nm[41]	?	?
Intel i960CA (32-bit, cache)	600,000[41]	1989	Intel	800 nm	143 mm2	4,200
Intel i860 (32/64-bit, 128-bit SIMD, cache, VLIW)	1,000,000[42]	1989	Intel	?	?	?
Intel 80486 (32-bit, 8 KB cache)	1,180,235	1989	Intel	1,000 nm	173 mm2	6,822
ARM 3 (32-bit, 4 KB cache)	310,000	1989	Acorn	1,500 nm	87 mm2	3,600
POWER1 (9-chip module, 72 kB of cache)	6,900,000[43]	1990	IBM	1,000 nm	1,283.61 mm2	5,375
Motorola 68040 (32-bit, 8 KB caches)	1,200,000	1990	Motorola	650 nm	152 mm2	7,900
R4000 (64-bit, 16 KB of caches)	1,350,000	1991	MIPS	1,000 nm	213 mm2	6,340
ARM 6 (32-bit, no cache for this 60 variant)	35,000	1991	ARM	800 nm	?	?
Hitachi SH-1 (32-bit, no cache)	600,000[44]	1992[45]	Hitachi	800 nm	100 mm2	6,000
Intel i960CF (32-bit, cache)	900,000[41]	1992	Intel	?	125 mm2	7,200
Alpha 21064 (64-bit, 290-pin; 16 KB of caches)	1,680,000	1992	DEC	750 nm	233.52 mm2	7,190
Hitachi HARP-1 (32-bit, cache)	2,800,000[46]	1993	Hitachi	500 nm	267 mm2	10,500
Pentium (32-bit, 16 KB of caches)	3,100,000	1993	Intel	800 nm	294 mm2	10,500
POWER2 (8-chip module, 288 kB of cache)	23,037,000[47]	1993	IBM	720 nm	1,217.39 mm2	18,923
ARM700 (32-bit; 8 KB cache)	578,977[48]	1994	ARM	700 nm	68.51 mm2	8,451
MuP21 (21-bit,[49] 40-pin; includes video)	7,000[50]	1994	Offete Enterprises	1,200 nm	?	?
Motorola 68060 (32-bit, 16 KB of caches)	2,500,000	1994	Motorola	600 nm	218 mm2	11,500
PowerPC 601 (32-bit, 32 KB of caches)	2,800,000[51]	1994	Apple, IBM, Motorola	600 nm	121 mm2	23,000
PowerPC 603 (32-bit, 16 KB of caches)	1,600,000[52]	1994	Apple, IBM, Motorola	500 nm	84.76 mm2	18,900
PowerPC 603e (32-bit, 32 KB of caches)	2,600,000[53]	1995	Apple, IBM, Motorola	500 nm	98 mm2	26,500
Alpha 21164 EV5 (64-bit, 112 kB cache)	9,300,000[54]	1995	DEC	500 nm	298.65 mm2	31,140
SA-110 (32-bit, 32 KB of caches)	2,500,000[29]	1995	Acorn, DEC, Apple	350 nm	50 mm2	50,000
Pentium Pro (32-bit, 16 KB of caches;[55] L2 cache on-package, but on separate die)	5,500,000[56]	1995	Intel	500 nm	307 mm2	18,000
PA-8000 64-bit, no cache	3,800,000[57]	1995	HP	500 nm	337.69 mm2	11,300
Alpha 21164A EV56 (64-bit, 112 kB cache)	9,660,000[58]	1996	DEC	350 nm	208.8 mm2	46,260
AMD K5 (32-bit, caches)	4,300,000	1996	AMD	500 nm	251 mm2	17,000
Pentium II Klamath (32-bit, 64-bit SIMD, caches)	7,500,000	1997	Intel	350 nm	195 mm2	39,000
AMD K6 (32-bit, caches)	8,800,000	1997	AMD	350 nm	162 mm2	54,000
F21 (21-bit; includes e.g. video)	15,000	1997[50]	Offete Enterprises	?	?	?
AVR (8-bit, 40-pin; w/memory)	140,000 (48,000 excl. memory[59])	1997	Nordic VLSI/Atmel	?	?	?
Pentium II Deschutes (32-bit, large cache)	7,500,000	1998	Intel	250 nm	113 mm2	66,000
Alpha 21264 EV6 (64-bit)	15,200,000[60]	1998	DEC	350 nm	313.96 mm2	48,400
Alpha 21164PC PCA57 (64-bit, 48 kB cache)	5,700,000	1998	Samsung	280 nm	100.5 mm2	56,700
Hitachi SH-4 (32-bit, caches)[61]	3,200,000[62]	1998	Hitachi	250 nm	57.76 mm2	55,400
ARM 9TDMI (32-bit, no cache)	111,000[29]	1999	Acorn	350 nm	4.8 mm2	23,100
Pentium III Katmai (32-bit, 128-bit SIMD, caches)	9,500,000	1999	Intel	250 nm	128 mm2	74,000
Emotion Engine (64-bit, 128-bit SIMD, cache)	10,500,000[63] – 13,500,000[64]	1999	Sony, Toshiba	250 nm	239.7 mm2[63]	43,800 – 56,300
Pentium II Mobile Dixon (32-bit, caches)	27,400,000	1999	Intel	180 nm	180 mm2	152,000
AMD K6-III (32-bit, caches)	21,300,000	1999	AMD	250 nm	118 mm2	181,000
AMD K7 (32-bit, caches)	22,000,000	1999	AMD	250 nm	184 mm2	120,000
Gekko (32-bit, large cache)	21,000,000[65]	2000	IBM, Nintendo	180 nm	43 mm2	490,000 (check)
Pentium III Coppermine (32-bit, large cache)	21,000,000	2000	Intel	180 nm	80 mm2	263,000
Pentium 4 Willamette (32-bit, large cache)	42,000,000	2000	Intel	180 nm	217 mm2	194,000
SPARC64 V (64-bit, large cache)	191,000,000[66]	2001	Fujitsu	130 nm[67]	290 mm2	659,000
Pentium III Tualatin (32-bit, large cache)	45,000,000	2001	Intel	130 nm	81 mm2	556,000
Pentium 4 Northwood (32-bit, large cache)	55,000,000	2002	Intel	130 nm	145 mm2	379,000
Itanium 2 McKinley (64-bit, large cache)	220,000,000	2002	Intel	180 nm	421 mm2	523,000
Alpha 21364 (64-bit, 946-pin, SIMD, very large caches)	152,000,000[12]	2003	DEC	180 nm	397 mm2	383,000
AMD K7 Barton (32-bit, large cache)	54,300,000	2003	AMD	130 nm	101 mm2	538,000
AMD K8 (64-bit, large cache)	105,900,000	2003	AMD	130 nm	193 mm2	548,700
Pentium M Banias (32-bit)	77,000,000[68]	2003	Intel	130 nm	83 mm2	928,000
Itanium 2 Madison 6M (64-bit)	410,000,000	2003	Intel	130 nm	374 mm2	1,096,000
PlayStation 2 single chip (CPU + GPU)	53,500,000[69]	2003[70]	Sony, Toshiba	90 nm[71] 130 nm[72][73]	86 mm2	622,100
Pentium 4 Prescott (32-bit, large cache)	112,000,000	2004	Intel	90 nm	110 mm2	1,018,000
Pentium M Dothan (32-bit)	144,000,000[74]	2004	Intel	90 nm	87 mm2	1,655,000
SPARC64 V+ (64-bit, large cache)	400,000,000[75]	2004	Fujitsu	90 nm	294 mm2	1,360,000
Itanium 2 (64-bit;9 MB cache)	592,000,000	2004	Intel	130 nm	432 mm2	1,370,000
Pentium 4 Prescott-2M (32-bit, large cache)	169,000,000	2005	Intel	90 nm	143 mm2	1,182,000
Pentium D Smithfield (64-bit, large cache)	228,000,000	2005	Intel	90 nm	206 mm2	1,107,000
Xenon (64-bit, 128-bit SIMD, large cache)	165,000,000	2005	IBM	90 nm	?	?
Cell (32-bit, cache)	250,000,000[76]	2005	Sony, IBM, Toshiba	90 nm	221 mm2	1,131,000
Pentium 4 Cedar Mill (32-bit, large cache)	184,000,000	2006	Intel	65 nm	90 mm2	2,044,000
Pentium D Presler (64-bit, large cache)	362,000,000 [77]	2006	Intel	65 nm	162 mm2	2,235,000
Core 2 Duo Conroe (dual-core 64-bit, large caches)	291,000,000	2006	Intel	65 nm	143 mm2	2,035,000
Dual-core Itanium 2 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,700,000,000[78]	2006	Intel	90 nm	596 mm2	2,852,000
AMD K10 quad-core 2M L3 (64-bit, large caches)	463,000,000[79]	2007	AMD	65 nm	283 mm2	1,636,000
ARM Cortex-A9 (32-bit, (optional) SIMD, caches)	26,000,000[80]	2007	ARM	45 nm	31 mm2	839,000
Core 2 Duo Wolfdale (dual-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	411,000,000	2007	Intel	45 nm	107 mm2	3,841,000
POWER6 (64-bit, large caches)	789,000,000	2007	IBM	65 nm	341 mm2	2,314,000
Core 2 Duo Allendale (dual-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	169,000,000	2007	Intel	65 nm	111 mm2	1,523,000
Uniphier	250,000,000[81]	2007	Matsushita	45 nm	?	?
SPARC64 VI (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	540,000,000	2007[82]	Fujitsu	90 nm	421 mm2	1,283,000
Core 2 Duo Wolfdale 3M (dual-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	230,000,000	2008	Intel	45 nm	83 mm2	2,771,000
Core i7 (quad-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	731,000,000	2008	Intel	45 nm	263 mm2	2,779,000
AMD K10 quad-core 6M L3 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	758,000,000[79]	2008	AMD	45 nm	258 mm2	2,938,000
Atom (32-bit, large cache)	47,000,000	2008	Intel	45 nm	24 mm2	1,958,000
SPARC64 VII (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	600,000,000	2008[83]	Fujitsu	65 nm	445 mm2	1,348,000
Six-core Xeon 7400 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,900,000,000	2008	Intel	45 nm	503 mm2	3,777,000
Six-core Opteron 2400 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	904,000,000	2009	AMD	45 nm	346 mm2	2,613,000
SPARC64 VIIIfx (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	760,000,000[84]	2009	Fujitsu	45 nm	513 mm2	1,481,000
Atom (Pineview) 64-bit, 1-core, 512 kB L2 cache	123,000,000[85]	2010	Intel	45 nm	66 mm2	1,864,000
Atom (Pineview) 64-bit, 2-core, 1 MB L2 cache	176,000,000[86]	2010	Intel	45 nm	87 mm2	2,023,000
SPARC T3 (16-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,000,000,000[87]	2010	Sun/Oracle	40 nm	377 mm2	2,653,000
Six-core Core i7 (Gulftown)	1,170,000,000	2010	Intel	32 nm	240 mm2	4,875,000
POWER7 32M L3 (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,200,000,000	2010	IBM	45 nm	567 mm2	2,116,000
Quad-core z196[88] (64-bit, very large caches)	1,400,000,000	2010	IBM	45 nm	512 mm2	2,734,000
Quad-core Itanium Tukwila (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	2,000,000,000[89]	2010	Intel	65 nm	699 mm2	2,861,000
Xeon Nehalem-EX (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	2,300,000,000[90]	2010	Intel	45 nm	684 mm2	3,363,000
SPARC64 IXfx (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,870,000,000[91]	2011	Fujitsu	40 nm	484 mm2	3,864,000
Quad-core + GPU Core i7 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	1,160,000,000	2011	Intel	32 nm	216 mm2	5,370,000
Six-core Core i7/8-core Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E/EP) (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	2,270,000,000[92]	2011	Intel	32 nm	434 mm2	5,230,000
Xeon Westmere-EX (10-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	2,600,000,000	2011	Intel	32 nm	512 mm2	5,078,000
Atom "Medfield" (64-bit)	432,000,000[93]	2012	Intel	32 nm	64 mm2	6,750,000
SPARC64 X (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	2,990,000,000[94]	2012	Fujitsu	28 nm	600 mm2	4,983,000
AMD Bulldozer (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,200,000,000[95]	2012	AMD	32 nm	315 mm2	3,810,000
Quad-core + GPU AMD Trinity (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,303,000,000	2012	AMD	32 nm	246 mm2	5,297,000
Quad-core + GPU Core i7 Ivy Bridge (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,400,000,000	2012	Intel	22 nm	160 mm2	8,750,000
POWER7+ (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, 80 MB L3 cache)	2,100,000,000	2012	IBM	32 nm	567 mm2	3,704,000
Six-core zEC12 (64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	2,750,000,000	2012	IBM	32 nm	597 mm2	4,606,000
Itanium Poulson (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	3,100,000,000	2012	Intel	32 nm	544 mm2	5,699,000
Xeon Phi (61-core 32-bit, 512-bit SIMD, caches)	5,000,000,000[96]	2012	Intel	22 nm	720 mm2	6,944,000
Apple A7 (dual-core 64/32-bit ARM64, "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	1,000,000,000	2013	Apple	28 nm	102 mm2	9,804,000
Six-core Core i7 Ivy Bridge E (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,860,000,000	2013	Intel	22 nm	256 mm2	7,266,000
POWER8 (12-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	4,200,000,000	2013	IBM	22 nm	650 mm2	6,462,000
Xbox One main SoC (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	5,000,000,000	2013	Microsoft, AMD	28 nm	363 mm2	13,770,000
Quad-core + GPU Core i7 Haswell (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,400,000,000[97]	2014	Intel	22 nm	177 mm2	7,910,000
Apple A8 (dual-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	2,000,000,000	2014	Apple	20 nm	89 mm2	22,470,000
Core i7 Haswell-E (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	2,600,000,000[98]	2014	Intel	22 nm	355 mm2	7,324,000
Apple A8X (tri-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	3,000,000,000[99]	2014	Apple	20 nm	128 mm2	23,440,000
Xeon Ivy Bridge-EX (15-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	4,310,000,000[100]	2014	Intel	22 nm	541 mm2	7,967,000
Xeon Haswell-E5 (18-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	5,560,000,000[101]	2014	Intel	22 nm	661 mm2	8,411,000
Quad-core + GPU GT2 Core i7 Skylake K (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,750,000,000	2015	Intel	14 nm	122 mm2	14,340,000
Dual-core + GPU Iris Core i7 Broadwell-U (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	1,900,000,000[102]	2015	Intel	14 nm	133 mm2	14,290,000
Apple A9 (dual-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	2,000,000,000+	2015	Apple	14 nm (Samsung)	96 mm2 (Samsung)	20,800,000+
				16 nm (TSMC)	104.5 mm2 (TSMC)	19,100,000+
Apple A9X (dual core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	3,000,000,000+	2015	Apple	16 nm	143.9 mm2	20,800,000+
IBM z13 (64-bit, caches)	3,990,000,000	2015	IBM	22 nm	678 mm2	5,885,000
IBM z13 Storage Controller	7,100,000,000	2015	IBM	22 nm	678 mm2	10,472,000
SPARC M7 (32-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	10,000,000,000[103]	2015	Oracle	20 nm	?	?
Core i7 Broadwell-E (10-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	3,200,000,000[104]	2016	Intel	14 nm	246 mm2[105]	13,010,000
Apple A10 Fusion (quad-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	3,300,000,000	2016	Apple	16 nm	125 mm2	26,400,000
HiSilicon Kirin 960 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	4,000,000,000[106]	2016	Huawei	16 nm	110.00 mm2	36,360,000
Xeon Broadwell-E5 (22-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	7,200,000,000[107]	2016	Intel	14 nm	456 mm2	15,790,000
Xeon Phi (72-core 64-bit, 512-bit SIMD, caches)	8,000,000,000	2016	Intel	14 nm	683 mm2	11,710,000
Zip CPU (32-bit, for FPGAs)	1,286 6-LUTs[108]	2016	Gisselquist Technology	?	?	?
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	3,000,000,000[109][110]	2016	Qualcomm	10 nm	72.3 mm2	41,490,000
Apple A11 Bionic (hexa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	4,300,000,000	2017	Apple	10 nm	89.23 mm2	48,190,000
AMD Zen CCX (core complex unit: 4 cores, 8 MB L3 cache)	1,400,000,000[111]	2017	AMD	14 nm (GF 14LPP)	44 mm2	31,800,000
AMD Zeppelin SoC Ryzen (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	4,800,000,000[112]	2017	AMD	14 nm	192 mm2	25,000,000
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Ryzen (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	4,800,000,000[113]	2017	AMD	14 nm	213 mm2	22,530,000
IBM z14 (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	6,100,000,000	2017	IBM	14 nm	696 mm2	8,764,000
IBM z14 Storage Controller (64-bit)	9,700,000,000	2017	IBM	14 nm	696 mm2	13,940,000
HiSilicon Kirin 970 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	5,500,000,000[114]	2017	Huawei	10 nm	96.72 mm2	56,900,000
Xbox One X (Project Scorpio) main SoC (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	7,000,000,000[115]	2017	Microsoft, AMD	16 nm	360 mm2[115]	19,440,000
Xeon Platinum 8180 (28-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	8,000,000,000[116]	2017	Intel	14 nm	?	?
Xeon (unspecified)	7,100,000,000[117]	2017	Intel	14 nm	672 mm2	10,570,000
POWER9 (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	8,000,000,000	2017	IBM	14 nm	695 mm2	11,500,000
Freedom U500 Base Platform Chip (E51, 4×U54) RISC-V (64-bit, caches)	250,000,000[118]	2017	SiFive	28 nm	~30 mm2	8,330,000
SPARC64 XII (12-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	5,450,000,000[119]	2017	Fujitsu	20 nm	795 mm2	6,850,000
Apple A10X Fusion (hexa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	4,300,000,000[120]	2017	Apple	10 nm	96.40 mm2	44,600,000
Centriq 2400 (64/32-bit, SIMD, caches)	18,000,000,000[121]	2017	Qualcomm	10 nm	398 mm2	45,200,000
AMD Epyc (32-core 64-bit, SIMD, caches)	19,200,000,000	2017	AMD	14 nm	768 mm2	25,000,000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	5,300,000,000[122]	2017	Qualcomm	10 nm	94 mm2	56,400,000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	5,300,000,000[123]	2017	Qualcomm	10 nm	94 mm2	56,400,000
HiSilicon Kirin 710 (octa-core ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	5,500,000,000[124]	2018	Huawei	12 nm	?	?
Apple A12 Bionic (hexa-core ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	6,900,000,000 [125][126]	2018	Apple	7 nm	83.27 mm2	82,900,000
HiSilicon Kirin 980 (octa-core ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	6,900,000,000[127]	2018	Huawei	7 nm	74.13 mm2	93,100,000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx / SCX8180 (octa-core ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	8,500,000,000[128]	2018	Qualcomm	7 nm	112 mm2	75,900,000
Apple A12X Bionic (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	10,000,000,000[129]	2018	Apple	7 nm	122 mm2	82,000,000
Fujitsu A64FX (64/32-bit, SIMD, caches)	8,786,000,000[130]	2018[131]	Fujitsu	7 nm	?	?
Tegra Xavier SoC (64/32-bit)	9,000,000,000[132]	2018	Nvidia	12 nm	350 mm2	25,700,000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	6,700,000,000[133]	2018	Qualcomm	7 nm	73 mm2	91,800,000
AMD Zen 2 core (0.5 MB L2 + 4 MB L3 cache)	475,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	7 nm	7.83 mm2	60,664,000
AMD Zen 2 CCX (core complex: 4 cores, 16 MB L3 cache)	1,900,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	7 nm	31.32 mm2	60,664,000
AMD Zen 2 CCD (core complex die: 8 cores, 32 MB L3 cache)	3,800,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	7 nm	74 mm2	51,350,000
AMD Zen 2 client I/O die	2,090,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	12 nm	125 mm2	16,720,000
AMD Zen 2 server I/O die	8,340,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	12 nm	416 mm2	20,050,000
AMD Zen 2 Renoir die	9,800,000,000[134]	2019	AMD	7 nm	156 mm2	62,820,000
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X (64-bit, SIMD, caches, I/O die)	5,990,000,000[135][g]	2019	AMD	7 & 12 nm (TSMC)	199  (74+125) mm2	30,100,000
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G	8,000,000,000[136]	2019	Huawei	7 nm	90.00 mm2	89,000,000
Apple A13 (hexa-core 64-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	8,500,000,000 [137][138]	2019	Apple	7 nm	98.48 mm2	86,300,000
IBM z15 CP chip (12 cores, 256 MB L3 cache)	9,200,000,000[139]	2019	IBM	14 nm	696 mm2	13,220,000
IBM z15 SC chip (960 MB L4 cache)	12,200,000,000	2019	IBM	14 nm	696 mm2	17,530,000
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (64-bit, SIMD, caches, I/O die)	9,890,000,000 [140][141]	2019	AMD	7 & 12 nm (TSMC)	273 mm2	36,230,000
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G	10,300,000,000[142]	2019	Huawei	7 nm	113.31 mm2	90,900,000
AWS Graviton2 (64-bit, 64-core ARM-based, SIMD, caches)[143][144]	30,000,000,000	2019	Amazon	7 nm	?	?
AMD Epyc Rome (64-bit, SIMD, caches)	39,540,000,000 [140][141]	2019	AMD	7 & 12 nm (TSMC)	1,008 mm2	39,226,000
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 (octa-core 64/32-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	10,300,000,000[145]	2019	Qualcomm	7 nm	83.54 mm2[146]	123,300,000
TI Jacinto TDA4VM (ARM A72, DSP, SRAM)	3,500,000,000[147]	2020	Texas Instruments	16 nm	?	?
Apple A14 Bionic (hexa-core 64-bit ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	11,800,000,000[148]	2020	Apple	5 nm	88 mm2	134,100,000
Apple M1 (octa-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	16,000,000,000[149]	2020	Apple	5 nm	119 mm2	134,500,000
HiSilicon Kirin 9000	15,300,000,000 [150][151]	2020	Huawei	5 nm	114 mm2	134,200,000
AMD Zen 3 CCX (core complex unit: 8 cores, 32 MB L3 cache)	4,080,000,000[152]	2020	AMD	7 nm	68 mm2	60,000,000
AMD Zen 3 CCD (core complex die)	4,150,000,000[152]	2020	AMD	7 nm	81 mm2	51,230,000
Core 11th gen Rocket Lake (8-core 64-bit, SIMD, large caches)	6,000,000,000+ [153]	2021	Intel	14 nm +++ 14 nm	276 mm2[154]	37,500,000 or 21,800,000+ [155]
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (64-bit, SIMD, caches, I/O and GPU)	10,700,000,000[156]	2021	AMD	7 nm	180 mm2	59,440,000
AMD Epyc 7763 (Milan) (64-core, 64-bit)	?	2021	AMD	7 & 12 nm (TSMC)	1,064 mm2 (8×81+416)[157]	?
Apple A15	15,000,000,000 [158][159]	2021	Apple	5 nm	107.68 mm2	139,300,000
Apple M1 Pro (10-core, 64-bit)	33,700,000,000[160]	2021	Apple	5 nm	245 mm2[161]	137,600,000
Apple M1 Max (10-core, 64-bit)	57,000,000,000 [162][160]	2021	Apple	5 nm	420.2 mm2[163]	135,600,000
Power10 dual-chip module (30 SMT8 cores or 60 SMT4 cores)	36,000,000,000[164]	2021	IBM	7 nm	1,204 mm2	29,900,000
Dimensity 9000 (ARM64 SoC)	15,300,000,000 [165][166]	2021	Mediatek	4 nm (TSMC N4)	?	?
Apple A16 (ARM64 SoC)	16,000,000,000 [167][168][169]	2022	Apple	4 nm	?	?
Apple M1 Ultra (dual-chip module, 2×10 cores)	114,000,000,000 [170][171]	2022	Apple	5 nm	840.5 mm2[163]	135,600,000
AMD Epyc 7773X (Milan-X) (multi-chip module, 64 cores, 768 MB L3 cache)	26,000,000,000 + Milan[172]	2022	AMD	7 & 12 nm (TSMC)	1,352 mm2 (Milan + 8×36)[172]	?
IBM Telum dual-chip module (2×8 cores, 2×256 MB cache)	45,000,000,000 [173][174]	2022	IBM	7 nm (Samsung)	1,060 mm2	42,450,000
Apple M2 (octa-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	20,000,000,000[175]	2022	Apple	5 nm	?	?
Dimensity 9200 (ARM64 SoC)	17,000,000,000 [176][177][178]	2022	Mediatek	4 nm (TSMC N4P)	?	?
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (octa-core ARM64 "mobile SoC", SIMD, caches)	16,000,000,000	2022	Qualcomm	4 nm	268 mm2	59,701,492
AMD EPYC Genoa (4th gen/9004 series) 13-chip module (up to 96 cores and 384 MB (L3) + 96 MB (L2) cache)[179]	90,000,000,000 [180][181]	2022	AMD	5 nm (CCD) 6 nm (IOD)	1,263.34 mm2 12×72.225 (CCD) 396.64 (IOD) [182][183]	71,240,000
HiSilicon Kirin 9000s	9,510,000,000[184]	2023	Huawei	7 nm	107 mm2	107,690,000
Apple M4 (deca-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	28,000,000,000[185]	2024	Apple	3 nm	?	?
Apple M3 (octa-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	25,000,000,000[186]	2023	Apple	3 nm	?	?
Apple M3 Pro (dodeca-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	37,000,000,000[186]	2023	Apple	3 nm	?	?
Apple M3 Max (16-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	92,000,000,000[186]	2023	Apple	3 nm	?	?
Apple A17	19,000,000,000 [187]	2023	Apple	3 nm	103.8 mm2	183,044,315
Sapphire Rapids quad-chip module (up to 60 cores and 112.5 MB of cache)[188]	44,000,000,000– 48,000,000,000[189]	2023	Intel	10 nm ESF (Intel 7)	1,600 mm2	27,500,000– 30,000,000
Apple M2 Pro (12-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	40,000,000,000[190]	2023	Apple	5 nm	?	?
Apple M2 Max (12-core 64-bit ARM64 SoC, SIMD, caches)	67,000,000,000[190]	2023	Apple	5 nm	?	?
Apple M2 Ultra (two M2 Max dies)	134,000,000,000[191]	2023	Apple	5 nm	?	?
AMD Epyc Bergamo (4th gen/97X4 series) 9-chip module (up to 128 cores and 256 MB (L3) + 128 MB (L2) cache)	82,000,000,000[192]	2023	AMD	5 nm (CCD) 6 nm (IOD)	?	?
AMD Instinct MI300A (multi-chip module, 24 cores, 128 GB GPU memory + 256 MB (LLC/L3) cache)	146,000,000,000[193][194]	2023	AMD	5 nm (CCD, GCD) 6 nm (IOD)	1,017 mm2	144,000,000
RV32-WUJI: 3-atom-thick molybdenum disulfide on sapphire; RISC-V architecture	5931[195]	2025	?	3000 nm	?	?
Processor	Transistor count	Year	Designer	Process (nm)	Area (mm2)	Transistor density (tr./mm2)

GPUs

A graphics processing unit (GPU) is a specialized electronic circuit designed to rapidly manipulate and alter memory to accelerate the building of images in a frame buffer intended for output to a display.

The designer refers to the technology company that designs the logic of the integrated circuit chip (such as Nvidia and AMD). The manufacturer ("Fab.") refers to the semiconductor company that fabricates the chip using its semiconductor manufacturing process at a foundry (such as TSMC and Samsung Semiconductor). The transistor count in a chip is dependent on a manufacturer's fabrication process, with smaller semiconductor nodes typically enabling higher transistor density and thus higher transistor counts.

The random-access memory (RAM) that comes with GPUs (such as VRAM, SGRAM or HBM) greatly increases the total transistor count, with the memory typically accounting for the majority of transistors in a graphics card. For example, Nvidia's Tesla P100 has 15 billion FinFETs (16 nm) in the GPU in addition to 16 GB of HBM2 memory, totaling about 150 billion MOSFETs on the graphics card.^[196] The following table does not include the memory. For memory transistor counts, see the Memory section below.

Processor	Transistor count	Year	Designer(s)	Fab(s)	Process	Area	Transistor density (tr./mm2)	Ref
μPD7220 GDC	40,000	1982	NEC	NEC	5,000 nm	?	?	[197]
ARTC HD63484	60,000	1984	Hitachi	Hitachi	?	?	?	[198]
CBM Agnus	21,000	1985	Commodore	CSG	5,000 nm	?	?	[199][200]
YM7101 VDP	100,000	1988	Yamaha, Sega	Yamaha	?	?	?	[201]
Tom & Jerry	750,000	1993	Flare	IBM	?	?	?	[201]
VDP1	1,000,000	1994	Sega	Hitachi	500 nm	?	?	[202]
Sony GPU	1,000,000	1994	Toshiba	LSI	500 nm	?	?	[203][204][205]
NV1	1,000,000	1995	Nvidia, Sega	SGS	500 nm	90 mm2	11,000
Reality Coprocessor	2,600,000	1996	SGI	NEC	350 nm	81 mm2	32,100	[206]
PowerVR	1,200,000	1996	VideoLogic	NEC	350 nm	?	?	[207]
Voodoo Graphics	1,000,000	1996	3dfx	TSMC	500 nm	?	?	[208][209]
Voodoo Rush	1,000,000	1997	3dfx	TSMC	500 nm	?	?	[208][209]
NV3	3,500,000	1997	Nvidia	SGS, TSMC	350 nm	90 mm2	38,900	[210][211]
i740	3,500,000	1998	Intel, Real3D	Real3D	350 nm	?	?	[208][209]
Voodoo 2	4,000,000	1998	3dfx	TSMC	350 nm	?	?
Voodoo Rush	4,000,000	1998	3dfx	TSMC	350 nm	?	?
NV4	7,000,000	1998	Nvidia	TSMC	350 nm	90 mm2	78,000	[208][211]
PowerVR2 CLX2	10,000,000	1998	VideoLogic	NEC	250 nm	116 mm2	86,200	[212][213][214][215]
PowerVR2 PMX1	6,000,000	1999	VideoLogic	NEC	250 nm	?	?	[216]
Rage 128	8,000,000	1999	ATI	TSMC, UMC	250 nm	70 mm2	114,000	[209]
Voodoo 3	8,100,000	1999	3dfx	TSMC	250 nm	?	?	[217]
Graphics Synthesizer	43,000,000	1999	Sony, Toshiba	Sony, Toshiba	180 nm	279 mm2	154,000	[65][218][64][63]
NV5	15,000,000	1999	Nvidia	TSMC	250 nm	90 mm2	167,000	[209]
NV10	17,000,000	1999	Nvidia	TSMC	220 nm	111 mm2	153,000	[219][211]
NV11	20,000,000	2000	Nvidia	TSMC	180 nm	65 mm2	308,000	[209]
NV15	25,000,000	2000	Nvidia	TSMC	180 nm	81 mm2	309,000	[209]
Voodoo 4	14,000,000	2000	3dfx	TSMC	220 nm	?	?	[208][209]
Voodoo 5	28,000,000	2000	3dfx	TSMC	220 nm	?	?	[208][209]
R100	30,000,000	2000	ATI	TSMC	180 nm	97 mm2	309,000	[209]
Flipper	51,000,000	2000	ArtX	NEC	180 nm	106 mm2	481,000	[65][220]
PowerVR3 KYRO	14,000,000	2001	Imagination	ST	250 nm	?	?	[208][209]
PowerVR3 KYRO II	15,000,000	2001	Imagination	ST	180 nm
NV2A	60,000,000	2001	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	?	?	[208][221]
NV20	57,000,000	2001	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	128 mm2	445,000	[209]
NV25	63,000,000	2002	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	142 mm2	444,000
NV28	36,000,000	2002	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	101 mm2	356,000
NV17/18	29,000,000	2002	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	65 mm2	446,000
R200	60,000,000	2001	ATI	TSMC	150 nm	68 mm2	882,000
R300	107,000,000	2002	ATI	TSMC	150 nm	218 mm2	490,800
R360	117,000,000	2003	ATI	TSMC	150 nm	218 mm2	536,700
NV34	45,000,000	2003	Nvidia	TSMC	150 nm	124 mm2	363,000
NV34b	45,000,000	2004	Nvidia	TSMC	140 nm	91 mm2	495,000
NV30	125,000,000	2003	Nvidia	TSMC	130 nm	199 mm2	628,000
NV31	80,000,000	2003	Nvidia	TSMC	130 nm	121 mm2	661,000
NV35/38	135,000,000	2003	Nvidia	TSMC	130 nm	207 mm2	652,000
NV36	82,000,000	2003	Nvidia	IBM	130 nm	133 mm2	617,000
R480	160,000,000	2004	ATI	TSMC	130 nm	297 mm2	538,700
NV40	222,000,000	2004	Nvidia	IBM	130 nm	305 mm2	727,900
NV44	75,000,000	2004	Nvidia	IBM	130 nm	110 mm2	681,800
NV41	222,000,000	2005	Nvidia	TSMC	110 nm	225 mm2	986,700	[209]
NV42	198,000,000	2005	Nvidia	TSMC	110 nm	222 mm2	891,900
NV43	146,000,000	2005	Nvidia	TSMC	110 nm	154 mm2	948,100
G70	303,000,000	2005	Nvidia	TSMC, Chartered	110 nm	333 mm2	909,900
Xenos	232,000,000	2005	ATI	TSMC	90 nm	182 mm2	1,275,000	[222][223]
RSX Reality Synthesizer	300,000,000	2005	Nvidia, Sony	Sony	90 nm	186 mm2	1,613,000	[224][225]
R520	321,000,000	2005	ATI	TSMC	90 nm	288 mm2	1,115,000	[209]
RV530	157,000,000	2005	ATI	TSMC	90 nm	150 mm2	1,047,000
RV515	107,000,000	2005	ATI	TSMC	90 nm	100 mm2	1,070,000
R580	384,000,000	2006	ATI	TSMC	90 nm	352 mm2	1,091,000
G71	278,000,000	2006	Nvidia	TSMC	90 nm	196 mm2	1,418,000
G72	112,000,000	2006	Nvidia	TSMC	90 nm	81 mm2	1,383,000
G73	177,000,000	2006	Nvidia	TSMC	90 nm	125 mm2	1,416,000
G80	681,000,000	2006	Nvidia	TSMC	90 nm	480 mm2	1,419,000
G86 Tesla	210,000,000	2007	Nvidia	TSMC	80 nm	127 mm2	1,654,000
G84 Tesla	289,000,000	2007	Nvidia	TSMC	80 nm	169 mm2	1,710,000
RV560	330,000,000	2006	ATI	TSMC	80 nm	230 mm2	1,435,000
R600	700,000,000	2007	ATI	TSMC	80 nm	420 mm2	1,667,000
RV610	180,000,000	2007	ATI	TSMC	65 nm	85 mm2	2,118,000	[209]
RV630	390,000,000	2007	ATI	TSMC	65 nm	153 mm2	2,549,000
G92	754,000,000	2007	Nvidia	TSMC, UMC	65 nm	324 mm2	2,327,000
G94 Tesla	505,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC	65 nm	240 mm2	2,104,000
G96 Tesla	314,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC	65 nm	144 mm2	2,181,000
G98 Tesla	210,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC	65 nm	86 mm2	2,442,000
GT200[226]	1,400,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC	65 nm	576 mm2	2,431,000
RV620	181,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	67 mm2	2,701,000	[209]
RV635	378,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	135 mm2	2,800,000
RV710	242,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	73 mm2	3,315,000
RV730	514,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	146 mm2	3,521,000
RV670	666,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	192 mm2	3,469,000
RV770	956,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	256 mm2	3,734,000
RV790	959,000,000	2008	ATI	TSMC	55 nm	282 mm2	3,401,000	[227][209]
G92b Tesla	754,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC, UMC	55 nm	260 mm2	2,900,000	[209]
G94b Tesla	505,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC, UMC	55 nm	196 mm2	2,577,000
G96b Tesla	314,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC, UMC	55 nm	121 mm2	2,595,000
GT200b Tesla	1,400,000,000	2008	Nvidia	TSMC, UMC	55 nm	470 mm2	2,979,000
GT218 Tesla	260,000,000	2009	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	57 mm2	4,561,000	[209]
GT216 Tesla	486,000,000	2009	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	100 mm2	4,860,000
GT215 Tesla	727,000,000	2009	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	144 mm2	5,049,000
RV740	826,000,000	2009	ATI	TSMC	40 nm	137 mm2	6,029,000
Cypress RV870	2,154,000,000	2009	ATI	TSMC	40 nm	334 mm2	6,449,000
Juniper RV840	1,040,000,000	2009	ATI	TSMC	40 nm	166 mm2	6,265,000
Redwood RV830	627,000,000	2010	AMD (ATI)	TSMC	40 nm	104 mm2	6,029,000	[209]
Cedar RV810	292,000,000	2010	AMD	TSMC	40 nm	59 mm2	4,949,000
Cayman RV970	2,640,000,000	2010	AMD	TSMC	40 nm	389 mm2	6,789,000
Barts RV940	1,700,000,000	2010	AMD	TSMC	40 nm	255 mm2	6,667,000
Turks RV930	716,000,000	2011	AMD	TSMC	40 nm	118 mm2	6,068,000
Caicos RV910	370,000,000	2011	AMD	TSMC	40 nm	67 mm2	5,522,000
GF100 Fermi	3,200,000,000	2010	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	526 mm2	6,084,000	[228]
GF110 Fermi	3,000,000,000	2010	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	520 mm2	5,769,000	[228]
GF104 Fermi	1,950,000,000	2011	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	332 mm2	5,873,000	[209]
GF106 Fermi	1,170,000,000	2010	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	238 mm2	4,916,000	[209]
GF108 Fermi	585,000,000	2011	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	116 mm2	5,043,000	[209]
GF119 Fermi	292,000,000	2011	Nvidia	TSMC	40 nm	79 mm2	3,696,000	[209]
Tahiti GCN1	4,312,711,873	2011	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	365 mm2	11,820,000	[229]
Cape Verde GCN1	1,500,000,000	2012	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	123 mm2	12,200,000	[209]
Pitcairn GCN1	2,800,000,000	2012	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	212 mm2	13,210,000	[209]
GK110 Kepler	7,080,000,000	2012	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	561 mm2	12,620,000	[230][231]
GK104 Kepler	3,540,000,000	2012	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	294 mm2	12,040,000	[232]
GK106 Kepler	2,540,000,000	2012	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	221 mm2	11,490,000	[209]
GK107 Kepler	1,270,000,000	2012	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	118 mm2	10,760,000	[209]
GK208 Kepler	1,020,000,000	2013	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	79 mm2	12,910,000	[209]
Oland GCN1	1,040,000,000	2013	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	90 mm2	11,560,000	[209]
Bonaire GCN2	2,080,000,000	2013	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	160 mm2	13,000,000
Durango (Xbox One)	4,800,000,000	2013	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	375 mm2	12,800,000	[233][234]
Liverpool (PlayStation 4)	?	2013	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	348 mm2	?	[235]
Hawaii GCN2	6,300,000,000	2013	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	438 mm2	14,380,000	[209]
GM200 Maxwell	8,000,000,000	2015	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	601 mm2	13,310,000
GM204 Maxwell	5,200,000,000	2014	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	398 mm2	13,070,000
GM206 Maxwell	2,940,000,000	2014	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	228 mm2	12,890,000
GM107 Maxwell	1,870,000,000	2014	Nvidia	TSMC	28 nm	148 mm2	12,640,000
Tonga GCN3	5,000,000,000	2014	AMD	TSMC, GlobalFoundries	28 nm	366 mm2	13,660,000
Fiji GCN3	8,900,000,000	2015	AMD	TSMC	28 nm	596 mm2	14,930,000
Durango 2 (Xbox One S)	5,000,000,000	2016	AMD	TSMC	16 nm	240 mm2	20,830,000	[236]
Neo (PlayStation 4 Pro)	5,700,000,000	2016	AMD	TSMC	16 nm	325 mm2	17,540,000	[237]
Ellesmere/Polaris 10 GCN4	5,700,000,000	2016	AMD	Samsung, GlobalFoundries	14 nm	232 mm2	24,570,000	[238]
Baffin/Polaris 11 GCN4	3,000,000,000	2016	AMD	Samsung, GlobalFoundries	14 nm	123 mm2	24,390,000	[209][239]
Lexa/Polaris 12 GCN4	2,200,000,000	2017	AMD	Samsung, GlobalFoundries	14 nm	101 mm2	21,780,000	[209][239]
GP100 Pascal	15,300,000,000	2016	Nvidia	TSMC, Samsung	16 nm	610 mm2	25,080,000	[240][241]
GP102 Pascal	11,800,000,000	2016	Nvidia	TSMC, Samsung	16 nm	471 mm2	25,050,000	[209][241]
GP104 Pascal	7,200,000,000	2016	Nvidia	TSMC	16 nm	314 mm2	22,930,000	[209][241]
GP106 Pascal	4,400,000,000	2016	Nvidia	TSMC	16 nm	200 mm2	22,000,000	[209][241]
GP107 Pascal	3,300,000,000	2016	Nvidia	Samsung	14 nm	132 mm2	25,000,000	[209][241]
GP108 Pascal	1,850,000,000	2017	Nvidia	Samsung	14 nm	74 mm2	25,000,000	[209][241]
Scorpio (Xbox One X)	6,600,000,000	2017	AMD	TSMC	16 nm	367 mm2	17,980,000	[233][242]
Vega 10 GCN5	12,500,000,000	2017	AMD	Samsung, GlobalFoundries	14 nm	484 mm2	25,830,000	[243]
GV100 Volta	21,100,000,000	2017	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	815 mm2	25,890,000	[244]
TU102 Turing	18,600,000,000	2018	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	754 mm2	24,670,000	[245]
TU104 Turing	13,600,000,000	2018	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	545 mm2	24,950,000
TU106 Turing	10,800,000,000	2018	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	445 mm2	24,270,000
TU116 Turing	6,600,000,000	2019	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	284 mm2	23,240,000	[246]
TU117 Turing	4,700,000,000	2019	Nvidia	TSMC	12 nm	200 mm2	23,500,000	[247]
Vega 20 GCN5	13,230,000,000	2018	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	331 mm2	39,970,000	[209]
Navi 10 RDNA	10,300,000,000	2019	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	251 mm2	41,040,000	[248]
Navi 12 RDNA	?	2020	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	?	?
Navi 14 RDNA	6,400,000,000	2019	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	158 mm2	40,510,000	[249]
Arcturus CDNA	25,600,000,000	2020	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	750 mm2	34,100,000	[250]
GA100 Ampere	54,200,000,000	2020	Nvidia	TSMC	7 nm	826 mm2	65,620,000	[251][252]
GA102 Ampere	28,300,000,000	2020	Nvidia	Samsung	8 nm	628 mm2	45,035,000	[253][254]
GA103 Ampere	22,000,000,000	2022	Nvidia	Samsung	8 nm	496 mm2	44,400,000	[255]
GA104 Ampere	17,400,000,000	2020	Nvidia	Samsung	8 nm	392 mm2	44,390,000	[256]
GA106 Ampere	12,000,000,000	2021	Nvidia	Samsung	8 nm	276 mm2	43,480,000	[257]
GA107 Ampere	8,700,000,000	2021	Nvidia	Samsung	8 nm	200 mm2	43,500,000	[258]
Navi 21 RDNA2	26,800,000,000	2020	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	520 mm2	51,540,000
Navi 22 RDNA2	17,200,000,000	2021	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	335 mm2	51,340,000
Navi 23 RDNA2	11,060,000,000	2021	AMD	TSMC	7 nm	237 mm2	46,670,000
Navi 24 RDNA2	5,400,000,000	2022	AMD	TSMC	6 nm	107 mm2	50,470,000
Aldebaran CDNA2	58,200,000,000 (MCM)	2021	AMD	TSMC	6 nm	1448–1474 mm2[259] 1480 mm2[260] 1490–1580 mm2[261]	39,500,000–40,200,000 39,200,000 36,800,000–39,100,000	[262]
GH100 Hopper	80,000,000,000	2022	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	814 mm2	98,280,000	[263]
AD102 Ada Lovelace	76,300,000,000	2022	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	608.4 mm2	125,411,000	[264]
AD103 Ada Lovelace	45,900,000,000	2022	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	378.6 mm2	121,240,000	[265]
AD104 Ada Lovelace	35,800,000,000	2022	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	294.5 mm2	121,560,000	[265]
AD106 Ada Lovelace	?	2023	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	190 mm2	?	[266][267]
AD107 Ada Lovelace	?	2023	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	146 mm2	?	[266][268]
Navi 31 RDNA3	57,700,000,000 (MCM) 45,400,000,000 (GCD) 6×2,050,000,000 (MCD)	2022	AMD	TSMC	5 nm (GCD) 6 nm (MCD)	531 mm2 (MCM) 306 mm2 (GCD) 6×37.5 mm2 (MCD)	109,200,000 (MCM) 132,400,000 (GCD) 54,640,000 (MCD)	[269][270][271]
Navi 32 RDNA3	28,100,000,000 (MCM)	2023	AMD	TSMC	5 nm (GCD) 6 nm (MCD)	350 mm2 (MCM) 200 mm2 (GCD) 4×37.5 mm2 (MCD)	80,200,000 (MCM)	[272]
Navi 33 RDNA3	13,300,000,000	2023	AMD	TSMC	6 nm	204 mm2	65,200,000	[273]
Aqua Vanjaram CDNA3	153,000,000,000 (MCM)	2023	AMD	TSMC	5 nm (GCD) 6 nm (MCD)	?	?	[274][275]
GB200 Grace Blackwell	208,000,000,000 (MCM)	2024	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	?	?	[276]
GB202 Blackwell	92,200,000,000	2025	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	750 mm2	122,600,000	[277]
GB203 Blackwell	45,600,000,000	2025	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	378 mm2	120,600,000	[278]
GB205 Blackwell	31,100,000,000	2025	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	263 mm2	118,300,000	[279]
GB206 Blackwell	21,900,000,000	2025	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	181 mm2	121,000,000	[280]
GB207 Blackwell	16,900,000,000	2025	Nvidia	TSMC	4 nm	149 mm2	113,400,000	[281]
Navi 44 RDNA4	29,700,000,000	2025	AMD	TSMC	4 nm	199 mm2	149,200,000	[282]
Navi 48 RDNA4	53,900,000,000	2025	AMD	TSMC	4 nm	357 mm2	151,000,000	[283]
Processor	Transistor count	Year	Designer(s)	Fab(s)	MOS process	Area	Transistor density (tr./mm2)	Ref

FPGA

A field-programmable gate array (FPGA) is an integrated circuit designed to be configured by a customer or a designer after manufacturing.

FPGA	Transistor count	Date of introduction	Designer	Manufacturer	Process	Area	Transistor density, tr./mm2	Ref
Virtex	70,000,000	1997	Xilinx
Virtex-E	200,000,000	1998	Xilinx
Virtex-II	350,000,000	2000	Xilinx		130 nm
Virtex-II PRO	430,000,000	2002	Xilinx
Virtex-4	1,000,000,000	2004	Xilinx		90 nm
Virtex-5	1,100,000,000	2006	Xilinx	TSMC	65 nm			[284]
Stratix IV	2,500,000,000	2008	Altera	TSMC	40 nm			[285]
Stratix V	3,800,000,000	2011	Altera	TSMC	28 nm			[citation needed]
Arria 10	5,300,000,000	2014	Altera	TSMC	20 nm			[286]
Virtex-7 2000T	6,800,000,000	2011	Xilinx	TSMC	28 nm			[287]
Stratix 10 SX 2800	17,000,000,000	TBD	Intel	Intel	14 nm	560 mm2	30,400,000	[288][289]
Virtex-Ultrascale VU440	20,000,000,000	Q1 2015	Xilinx	TSMC	20 nm			[290][291]
Virtex-Ultrascale+ VU19P	35,000,000,000	2020	Xilinx	TSMC	16 nm	900 mm2[h]	38,900,000	[292][293][294]
Versal VC1902	37,000,000,000	2H 2019	Xilinx	TSMC	7 nm			[295][296][297]
Stratix 10 GX 10M	43,300,000,000	Q4 2019	Intel	Intel	14 nm	1,400 mm2[h]	30,930,000	[298][299]
Versal VP1802	92,000,000,000	2021 ?[i]	Xilinx	TSMC	7 nm			[300][301]

Memory

Semiconductor memory is an electronic data storage device, often used as computer memory, implemented on integrated circuits. Nearly all semiconductor memories since the 1970s have used MOSFETs (MOS transistors), replacing earlier bipolar junction transistors. There are two major types of semiconductor memory: random-access memory (RAM) and non-volatile memory (NVM). In turn, there are two major RAM types: dynamic random-access memory (DRAM) and static random-access memory (SRAM), as well as two major NVM types: flash memory and read-only memory (ROM).

Typical CMOS SRAM consists of six transistors per cell. For DRAM, 1T1C, which means one transistor and one capacitor structure, is common. Capacitor charged or not^{[clarification needed]} is used to store 1 or 0. In flash memory, the data is stored in floating gates, and the resistance of the transistor is sensed^{[clarification needed]} to interpret the data stored. Depending on how fine scale the resistance could be separated^{[clarification needed]}, one transistor could store up to three bits, meaning eight distinctive levels of resistance possible per transistor. However, a finer scale comes with the cost of repeatability issues, and hence reliability. Typically, low grade 2-bits MLC flash is used for flash drives, so a 16 GB flash drive contains roughly 64 billion transistors.

For SRAM chips, six-transistor cells (six transistors per bit) was the standard.^[302] DRAM chips during the early 1970s had three-transistor cells (three transistors per bit), before single-transistor cells (one transistor per bit) became standard since the era of 4 Kb DRAM in the mid-1970s.^[303][304] In single-level flash memory, each cell contains one floating-gate MOSFET (one transistor per bit),^[305] whereas multi-level flash contains 2, 3 or 4 bits per transistor.

Flash memory chips are commonly stacked up in layers, up to 128-layer in production,^[306] and 136-layer managed,^[307] and available in end-user devices up to 69-layer from manufacturers.

Random-access memory (RAM)

Chip name	Capacity (bits)	RAM type	Transistor count	Date of introduction	Manufacturer(s)	Process	Area	Transistor density (tr./mm2)	Ref
—N/a	1-bit	SRAM (cell)	6	1963	Fairchild	—N/a	—N/a	?	[308]
—N/a	1-bit	DRAM (cell)	1	1965	Toshiba	—N/a	—N/a	?	[309][310]
?	8-bit	SRAM (bipolar)	48	1965	SDS, Signetics	?	?	?	[308]
SP95	16-bit	SRAM (bipolar)	80	1965	IBM	?	?	?	[311]
TMC3162	16-bit	SRAM (TTL)	96	1966	Transitron	—N/a	?	?	[304]
?	?	SRAM (MOS)	?	1966	NEC	?	?	?	[303]
	256-bit	DRAM (IC)	256	1968	Fairchild	?	?	?	[304]
	64-bit	SRAM (PMOS)	384	1968	Fairchild	?	?	?	[303]
	144-bit	SRAM (NMOS)	864	1968	NEC
1101	256-bit	SRAM (PMOS)	1,536	1969	Intel	12,000 nm	?	?	[312][313][314]
1102	1 Kb	DRAM (PMOS)	3,072	1970	Intel, Honeywell	?	?	?	[303]
1103	1 Kb	DRAM (PMOS)	3,072	1970	Intel	8,000 nm	10 mm2	307	[315][302][316][304]
μPD403	1 Kb	DRAM (NMOS)	3,072	1971	NEC	?	?	?	[317]
?	2 Kb	DRAM (PMOS)	6,144	1971	General Instrument	?	12.7 mm2	484	[318]
2102	1 Kb	SRAM (NMOS)	6,144	1972	Intel	?	?	?	[312][319]
?	8 Kb	DRAM (PMOS)	8,192	1973	IBM	?	18.8 mm2	436	[318]
5101	1 Kb	SRAM (CMOS)	6,144	1974	Intel	?	?	?	[312]
2116	16 Kb	DRAM (NMOS)	16,384	1975	Intel	?	?	?	[320][304]
2114	4 Kb	SRAM (NMOS)	24,576	1976	Intel	?	?	?	[312][321]
?	4 Kb	SRAM (CMOS)	24,576	1977	Toshiba	?	?	?	[313]
	64 Kb	DRAM (NMOS)	65,536	1977	NTT	?	35.4 mm2	1851	[318]
		DRAM (VMOS)	65,536	1979	Siemens	?	25.2 mm2	2601	[318]
	16 Kb	SRAM (CMOS)	98,304	1980	Hitachi, Toshiba	?	?	?	[322]
	256 Kb	DRAM (NMOS)	262,144	1980	NEC	1,500 nm	41.6 mm2	6302	[318]
					NTT	1,000 nm	34.4 mm2	7620	[318]
	64 Kb	SRAM (CMOS)	393,216	1980	Matsushita	?	?	?	[322]
	288 Kb	DRAM	294,912	1981	IBM	?	25 mm2	11,800	[323]
	64 Kb	SRAM (NMOS)	393,216	1982	Intel	1,500 nm	?	?	[322]
	256 Kb	SRAM (CMOS)	1,572,864	1984	Toshiba	1,200 nm	?	?	[322][314]
	8 Mb	DRAM	8,388,608	January 5, 1984	Hitachi	?	?	?	[324][325]
	16 Mb	DRAM (CMOS)	16,777,216	1987	NTT	700 nm	148 mm2	113,400	[318]
	4 Mb	SRAM (CMOS)	25,165,824	1990	NEC, Toshiba, Hitachi, Mitsubishi	?	?	?	[322]
	64 Mb	DRAM (CMOS)	67,108,864	1991	Matsushita, Mitsubishi, Fujitsu, Toshiba	400 nm
KM48SL2000	16 Mb	SDRAM	16,777,216	1992	Samsung	?	?	?	[326][327]
?	16 Mb	SRAM (CMOS)	100,663,296	1992	Fujitsu, NEC	400 nm	?	?	[322]
	256 Mb	DRAM (CMOS)	268,435,456	1993	Hitachi, NEC	250 nm
	1 Gb	DRAM	1,073,741,824	January 9, 1995	NEC	250 nm	?	?	[328][329]
					Hitachi	160 nm	?	?
		SDRAM	1,073,741,824	1996	Mitsubishi	150 nm	?	?	[322]
		SDRAM (SOI)	1,073,741,824	1997	Hyundai	?	?	?	[330]
	4 Gb	DRAM (4-bit)	1,073,741,824	1997	NEC	150 nm	?	?	[322]
		DRAM	4,294,967,296	1998	Hyundai	?	?	?	[330]
	8 Gb	SDRAM (DDR3)	8,589,934,592	April 2008	Samsung	50 nm	?	?	[331]
	16 Gb	SDRAM (DDR3)	17,179,869,184	2008
	32 Gb	SDRAM (HBM2)	34,359,738,368	2016	Samsung	20 nm	?	?	[332]
	64 Gb	SDRAM (HBM2)	68,719,476,736	2017
	128 Gb	SDRAM (DDR4)	137,438,953,472	2018	Samsung	10 nm	?	?	[333]
	?	RRAM[334] (3DSoC)[335]	?	2019	SkyWater Technology[336]	90 nm	?	?

Flash memory

Chip name	Capacity (bits)	Flash type	FGMOS transistor count	Date of introduction	Manufacturer(s)	Process	Area	Transistor density (tr./mm2)	Ref
?	256 Kb	NOR	262,144	1985	Toshiba	2,000 nm	?	?	[322]
	1 Mb	NOR	1,048,576	1989	Seeq, Intel	?
	4 Mb	NAND	4,194,304	1989	Toshiba	1,000 nm
	16 Mb	NOR	16,777,216	1991	Mitsubishi	600 nm
DD28F032SA	32 Mb	NOR	33,554,432	1993	Intel	?	280 mm2	120,000	[312][337]
?	64 Mb	NOR	67,108,864	1994	NEC	400 nm	?	?	[322]
		NAND	67,108,864	1996	Hitachi
	128 Mb	NAND	134,217,728	1996	Samsung, Hitachi	?
	256 Mb	NAND	268,435,456	1999	Hitachi, Toshiba	250 nm
	512 Mb	NAND	536,870,912	2000	Toshiba	?	?	?	[338]
	1 Gb	2-bit NAND	536,870,912	2001	Samsung	?	?	?	[322]
					Toshiba, SanDisk	160 nm	?	?	[339]
	2 Gb	NAND	2,147,483,648	2002	Samsung, Toshiba	?	?	?	[340][341]
	8 Gb	NAND	8,589,934,592	2004	Samsung	60 nm	?	?	[340]
	16 Gb	NAND	17,179,869,184	2005	Samsung	50 nm	?	?	[342]
	32 Gb	NAND	34,359,738,368	2006	Samsung	40 nm
THGAM	128 Gb	Stacked NAND	128,000,000,000	April 2007	Toshiba	56 nm	252 mm2	507,900,000	[343]
THGBM	256 Gb	Stacked NAND	256,000,000,000	2008	Toshiba	43 nm	353 mm2	725,200,000	[344]
THGBM2	1 Tb	Stacked 4-bit NAND	256,000,000,000	2010	Toshiba	32 nm	374 mm2	684,500,000	[345]
KLMCG8GE4A	512 Gb	Stacked 2-bit NAND	256,000,000,000	2011	Samsung	?	192 mm2	1,333,000,000	[346]
KLUFG8R1EM	4 Tb	Stacked 3-bit V-NAND	1,365,333,333,504	2017	Samsung	?	150 mm2	9,102,000,000	[347]
eUFS (1 TB)	8 Tb	Stacked 4-bit V-NAND	2,048,000,000,000	2019	Samsung	?	150 mm2	13,650,000,000	[348][349]
?	1 Tb	232L TLC NAND die	333,333,333,333	2022	Micron	?	68.5 mm2 (memory array)	4,870,000,000 (14.6 Gbit/mm2)	[350][351][352][353]
?	16 Tb	232L package	5,333,333,333,333	2022	Micron	?	68.5 mm2 (memory array)	77,900,000,000 (16×14.6 Gbit/mm2)

Read-only memory (ROM)

Chip name	Capacity (bits)	ROM type	Transistor count	Date of introduction	Manufacturer(s)	Process	Area	Ref
?	?	PROM	?	1956	Arma	—N/a	?	[354][355]
	1 Kb	ROM (MOS)	1,024	1965	General Microelectronics	?	?	[356]
3301	1 Kb	ROM (bipolar)	1,024	1969	Intel	—N/a	?	[356]
1702	2 Kb	EPROM (MOS)	2,048	1971	Intel	?	15 mm2	[357]
?	4 Kb	ROM (MOS)	4,096	1974	AMD, General Instrument	?	?	[356]
2708	8 Kb	EPROM (MOS)	8,192	1975	Intel	?	?	[312]
?	2 Kb	EEPROM (MOS)	2,048	1976	Toshiba	?	?	[358]
μCOM-43 ROM	16 Kb	PROM (PMOS)	16,000	1977	NEC	?	?	[359]
2716	16 Kb	EPROM (TTL)	16,384	1977	Intel	—N/a	?	[315][360]
EA8316F	16 Kb	ROM (NMOS)	16,384	1978	Electronic Arrays	?	436 mm2	[356][361]
2732	32 Kb	EPROM	32,768	1978	Intel	?	?	[312]
2364	64 Kb	ROM	65,536	1978	Intel	?	?	[362]
2764	64 Kb	EPROM	65,536	1981	Intel	3,500 nm	?	[312][322]
27128	128 Kb	EPROM	131,072	1982	Intel	?
27256	256 Kb	EPROM (HMOS)	262,144	1983	Intel	?	?	[312][363]
?	256 Kb	EPROM (CMOS)	262,144	1983	Fujitsu	?	?	[364]
	512 Kb	EPROM (NMOS)	524,288	1984	AMD	1,700 nm	?	[322]
27512	512 Kb	EPROM (HMOS)	524,288	1984	Intel	?	?	[312][365]
?	1 Mb	EPROM (CMOS)	1,048,576	1984	NEC	1,200 nm	?	[322]
	4 Mb	EPROM (CMOS)	4,194,304	1987	Toshiba	800 nm
	16 Mb	EPROM (CMOS)	16,777,216	1990	NEC	600 nm
		MROM	16,777,216	1995	AKM, Hitachi	?	?	[329]

Transistor computers

Part of an IBM 7070 card cage populated with Standard Modular System cards

Before transistors were invented, relays were used in commercial tabulating machines and experimental early computers. The world's first working programmable, fully automatic digital computer,^[366] the 1941 Z3 22-bit word length computer, had 2,600 relays, and operated at a clock frequency of about 4–5 Hz. The 1940 Complex Number Computer had fewer than 500 relays,^[367] but it was not fully programmable. The earliest practical computers used vacuum tubes and solid-state diode logic. ENIAC had 18,000 vacuum tubes, 7,200 crystal diodes, and 1,500 relays, with many of the vacuum tubes containing two triode elements.

The second generation of computers were transistor computers that featured boards filled with discrete transistors, solid-state diodes and magnetic memory cores. The experimental 1953 48-bit Transistor Computer, developed at the University of Manchester, is widely believed to be the first transistor computer to come into operation anywhere in the world (the prototype had 92 point-contact transistors and 550 diodes).^[368] A later version the 1955 machine had a total of 250 junction transistors and 1,300 point-contact diodes. The Computer also used a small number of tubes in its clock generator, so it was not the first fully transistorized. The ETL Mark III, developed at the Electrotechnical Laboratory in 1956, may have been the first transistor-based electronic computer using the stored program method. It had about "130 point-contact transistors and about 1,800 germanium diodes were used for logic elements, and these were housed on 300 plug-in packages which could be slipped in and out."^[369] The 1958 decimal architecture IBM 7070 was the first transistor computer to be fully programmable. It had about 30,000 alloy-junction germanium transistors and 22,000 germanium diodes, on approximately 14,000 Standard Modular System (SMS) cards. The 1959 MOBIDIC, short for "MOBIle DIgital Computer", at 12,000 pounds (6.0 short tons) mounted in the trailer of a semi-trailer truck, was a transistorized computer for battlefield data.

The third generation of computers used integrated circuits (ICs).^[370] The 1962 15-bit Apollo Guidance Computer used "about 4,000 "Type-G" (3-input NOR gate) circuits" for about 12,000 transistors plus 32,000 resistors.^[371]The IBM System/360, introduced 1964, used discrete transistors in hybrid circuit packs.^[370] The 1965 12-bit PDP-8 CPU had 1409 discrete transistors and over 10,000 diodes, on many cards. Later versions, starting with the 1968 PDP-8/I, used integrated circuits. The PDP-8 was later reimplemented as a microprocessor as the Intersil 6100, see below.^[372]

The next generation of computers were the microcomputers, starting with the 1971 Intel 4004, which used MOS transistors. These were used in home computers or personal computers (PCs).

This list includes early transistorized computers (second generation) and IC-based computers (third generation) from the 1950s and 1960s.

Computer	Transistor count	Year	Manufacturer	Notes	Ref
Transistor Computer	92	1953	University of Manchester	Point-contact transistors, 550 diodes. Lacked stored program capability.	[368]
TRADIC	700	1954	Bell Labs	Point-contact transistors	[368]
Transistor Computer (full size)	250	1955	University of Manchester	Discrete point-contact transistors, 1,300 diodes	[368]
IBM 608	3,000	1955	IBM	Germanium transistors	[373]
ETL Mark III	130	1956	Electrotechnical Laboratory	Point-contact transistors, 1,800 diodes, stored program capability	[368][369]
Metrovick 950	200	1956	Metropolitan-Vickers	Discrete junction transistors
NEC NEAC-2201	600	1958	NEC	Germanium transistors	[374]
Hitachi MARS-1	1,000	1958	Hitachi		[375]
IBM 7070	30,000	1958	IBM	Alloy-junction germanium transistors, 22,000 diodes	[376]
Matsushita MADIC-I	400	1959	Matsushita	Bipolar transistors	[377]
NEC NEAC-2203	2,579	1959	NEC		[378]
Toshiba TOSBAC-2100	5,000	1959	Toshiba		[379]
IBM 7090	50,000	1959	IBM	Discrete germanium transistors	[380]
PDP-1	2,700	1959	Digital Equipment Corporation	Discrete transistors
Olivetti Elea 9003	?	1959	Olivetti	300,000 (?) discrete transistors and diodes	[381]
Mitsubishi MELCOM 1101	3,500	1960	Mitsubishi	Germanium transistors	[382]
M18 FADAC	1,600	1960	Autonetics	Discrete transistors
CPU of IBM 7030 Stretch	169,100	1961	IBM	World's fastest computer from 1961 to 1964	[383]
D-17B	1,521	1962	Autonetics	Discrete transistors
NEC NEAC-L2	16,000	1964	NEC	Ge transistors	[384]
CDC 6600 (entire computer)	400,000	1964	Control Data Corporation	World's fastest computer from 1964 to 1969	[385]
IBM System/360	?	1964	IBM	Hybrid circuits
PDP-8 "Straight-8"	1,409[372]	1965	Digital Equipment Corporation	discrete transistors, 10,000 diodes
PDP-8/S	1,001[386][387][388]	1966	Digital Equipment Corporation	discrete transistors, diodes
PDP-8/I	1,409[citation needed]	1968[389]	Digital Equipment Corporation	74 series TTL circuits[390]
Apollo Guidance Computer Block I	12,300	1966	Raytheon / MIT Instrumentation Laboratory	4,100 ICs, each containing a 3-transistor, 3-input NOR gate. (Block II had 2,800 dual 3-input NOR gates ICs.)

Logic functions

Transistor count for generic logic functions is based on static CMOS implementation.^[391]

Function	Transistor count	Ref.
NOT	2
Buffer	4
NAND 2-input	4
NOR 2-input	4
AND 2-input	6
OR 2-input	6
NAND 3-input	6
NOR 3-input	6
XOR 2-input	6
XNOR 2-input	8
MUX 2-input with TG	6
MUX 4-input with TG	18
NOT MUX 2-input	8
MUX 4-input	24
1-bit full adder	24
1-bit adder–subtractor	48
AND-OR-INVERT	6	[392]
Latch, D gated	8
Flip-flop, edge triggered dynamic D with reset	12
8-bit multiplier	3,000
16-bit multiplier	9,000
32-bit multiplier	21,000	[citation needed]
small-scale integration	2–100	[393]
medium-scale integration	100–500	[393]
large-scale integration	500–20,000	[393]
very-large-scale integration	20,000–1,000,000	[393]
ultra-large scale integration	>1,000,000

Parallel systems

Historically, each processing element in earlier parallel systems—like all CPUs of that time—was a serial computer built out of multiple chips. As transistor counts per chip increases, each processing element could be built out of fewer chips, and then later each multi-core processor chip could contain more processing elements.^[394]

Goodyear MPP: (1983?) 8 pixel processors per chip, 3,000 to 8,000 transistors per chip.^[394]

Brunel University Scape (single-chip array-processing element): (1983) 256 pixel processors per chip, 120,000 to 140,000 transistors per chip.^[394]

Cell Broadband Engine: (2006) with 9 cores per chip, had 234 million transistors per chip.^[395]

Other devices

Device type	Device name	Transistor count	Date of introduction	Designer(s)	Manufacturer(s)	MOS process	Area	Transistor density, tr./mm2	Ref
Deep learning engine / IPU[j]	Colossus GC2	23,600,000,000	2018	Graphcore	TSMC	16 nm	~800 mm2	29,500,000	[396][397][398][better source needed]
Deep learning engine / IPU	Wafer Scale Engine	1,200,000,000,000	2019	Cerebras	TSMC	16 nm	46,225 mm2	25,960,000	[1][2][3][4]
Deep learning engine / IPU	Wafer Scale Engine 2	2,600,000,000,000	2020	Cerebras	TSMC	7 nm	46,225 mm2	56,250,000	[5][399][400]
Network switch	NVLink4 NVSwitch	25,100,000,000	2022	Nvidia	TSMC	N4 (4 nm)	294 mm2	85,370,000	[401]

Transistor density

The transistor density is the number of transistors that are fabricated per unit area, typically measured in terms of the number of transistors per square millimeter (mm²). The transistor density usually correlates with the gate length of a semiconductor node (also known as a semiconductor manufacturing process), typically measured in nanometers (nm). As of 2019^[update], the semiconductor node with the highest transistor density is TSMC's 5 nanometer node, with 171.3 million transistors per square millimeter (note this corresponds to a transistor-transistor spacing of 76.4 nm, far greater than the relative meaningless "5nm")^[402]

MOSFET nodes

Semiconductor nodes

Node name	Transistor density (transistors/mm2)	Production year	Process	MOSFET	Manufacturer(s)	Ref
?	?	1960	20,000 nm	PMOS	Bell Labs	[403][404]
?	?	1960	20,000 nm	NMOS
?	?	1963	?	CMOS	Fairchild	[405]
?	?	1964	?	PMOS	General Microelectronics	[406]
?	?	1968	20,000 nm	CMOS	RCA	[407]
?	?	1969	12,000 nm	PMOS	Intel	[322][314]
?	?	1970	10,000 nm	CMOS	RCA	[407]
?	300	1970	8,000 nm	PMOS	Intel	[316][304]
?	?	1971	10,000 nm	PMOS	Intel	[408]
?	480	1971	?	PMOS	General Instrument	[318]
?	?	1973	?	NMOS	Texas Instruments	[318]
?	220	1973	?	NMOS	Mostek	[318]
?	?	1973	7,500 nm	NMOS	NEC	[18][17]
?	?	1973	6,000 nm	PMOS	Toshiba	[19][409]
?	?	1976	5,000 nm	NMOS	Hitachi, Intel	[318]
?	?	1976	5,000 nm	CMOS	RCA
?	?	1976	4,000 nm	NMOS	Zilog
?	?	1976	3,000 nm	NMOS	Intel	[410]
?	1,850	1977	?	NMOS	NTT	[318]
?	?	1978	3,000 nm	CMOS	Hitachi	[411]
?	?	1978	2,500 nm	NMOS	Texas Instruments	[318]
?	?	1978	2,000 nm	NMOS	NEC, NTT
?	2,600	1979	?	VMOS	Siemens
?	7,280	1979	1,000 nm	NMOS	NTT
?	7,620	1980	1,000 nm	NMOS	NTT
?	?	1983	2,000 nm	CMOS	Toshiba	[322]
?	?	1983	1,500 nm	CMOS	Intel	[318]
?	?	1983	1,200 nm	CMOS	Intel
?	?	1984	800 nm	CMOS	NTT
?	?	1987	700 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu
?	?	1989	600 nm	CMOS	Mitsubishi, NEC, Toshiba	[322]
?	?	1989	500 nm	CMOS	Hitachi, Mitsubishi, NEC, Toshiba
?	?	1991	400 nm	CMOS	Matsushita, Mitsubishi, Fujitsu, Toshiba
?	?	1993	350 nm	CMOS	Sony
?	?	1993	250 nm	CMOS	Hitachi, NEC
3LM	32,000	1994	350 nm	CMOS	NEC	[206]
?	?	1995	160 nm	CMOS	Hitachi	[322]
?	?	1996	150 nm	CMOS	Mitsubishi
TSMC 180 nm	?	1998	180 nm	CMOS	TSMC	[412]
CS80	?	1999	180 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu	[413]
?	?	1999	180 nm	CMOS	Intel, Sony, Toshiba	[312][218]
CS85	?	1999	170 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu	[414]
Samsung 140 nm	?	1999	140 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[322]
?	?	2001	130 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu, Intel	[413][312]
Samsung 100 nm	?	2001	100 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[322]
?	?	2002	90 nm	CMOS	Sony, Toshiba, Samsung	[218][340]
CS100	?	2003	90 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu	[413]
Intel 90 nm	1,450,000	2004	90 nm	CMOS	Intel	[415][312]
Samsung 80 nm	?	2004	80 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[416]
?	?	2004	65 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu, Toshiba	[417]
Samsung 60 nm	?	2004	60 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[340]
TSMC 45 nm	?	2004	45 nm	CMOS	TSMC
Elpida 90 nm	?	2005	90 nm	CMOS	Elpida Memory	[418]
CS200	?	2005	65 nm	CMOS	Fujitsu	[419][413]
Samsung 50 nm	?	2005	50 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[342]
Intel 65 nm	2,080,000	2006	65 nm	CMOS	Intel	[415]
Samsung 40 nm	?	2006	40 nm	CMOS	Samsung	[342]
Toshiba 56 nm	?	2007	56 nm	CMOS	Toshiba	[343]
Matsushita 45 nm	?	2007	45 nm	CMOS	Matsushita	[81]
Intel 45 nm	3,300,000	2008	45 nm	CMOS	Intel	[420]
Toshiba 43 nm	?	2008	43 nm	CMOS	Toshiba	[344]
TSMC 40 nm	?	2008	40 nm	CMOS	TSMC	[421]
Toshiba 32 nm	?	2009	32 nm	CMOS	Toshiba	[422]
Intel 32 nm	7,500,000	2010	32 nm	CMOS	Intel	[420]
?	?	2010	20 nm	CMOS	Hynix, Samsung	[423][342]
Intel 22 nm	15,300,000	2012	22 nm	CMOS	Intel	[420]
IMFT 20 nm	?	2012	20 nm	CMOS	IMFT	[424]
Toshiba 19 nm	?	2012	19 nm	CMOS	Toshiba
Hynix 16 nm	?	2013	16 nm	FinFET	SK Hynix	[423]
TSMC 16 nm	28,880,000	2013	16 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[425][426]
Samsung 10 nm	51,820,000	2013	10 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[427][428]
Intel 14 nm	37,500,000	2014	14 nm	FinFET	Intel	[420]
14LP	32,940,000	2015	14 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[427]
TSMC 10 nm	52,510,000	2016	10 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[425][429]
12LP	36,710,000	2017	12 nm	FinFET	GlobalFoundries, Samsung	[239]
N7FF	96,500,000 101,850,000[430]	2017	7 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[431][432][433]
8LPP	61,180,000	2018	8 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[427]
7LPE	95,300,000	2018	7 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[432]
Intel 10 nm	100,760,000 106,100,000[430]	2018	10 nm	FinFET	Intel	[434]
5LPE	126,530,000 133,560,000[430] 134,900,000[435]	2018	5 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[436][437]
N7FF+	113,900,000	2019	7 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[431][432]
CLN5FF	171,300,000 185,460,000[430]	2019	5 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[402]
Intel 7	100,760,000 106,100,000[430]	2021	7 nm	FinFET	Intel
4LPE	145,700,000[435]	2021	4 nm	FinFET	Samsung	[438][439][440]
N4	196,600,000[430][441]	2021	4 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[442]
N4P	196,600,000[430][441]	2022	4 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[443]
3GAE	202,850,000[430]	2022	3 nm	MBCFET	Samsung	[444][438][445]
N3	314,730,000[430]	2022	3 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[446][447]
N4X	?	2023	4 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[448][449][450]
N3E	?	2023	3 nm	FinFET	TSMC	[447][451]
3GAP	?	2023	3 nm	MBCFET	Samsung	[438]
Intel 4	160,000,000[452]	2023	4 nm	FinFET	Intel	[453][454][455]
Intel 3	?	2023	3 nm	FinFET	Intel	[454][455]
Intel 20A	?	2024	2 nm	RibbonFET	Intel	[454][455]
Intel 18A	?	2025	sub-2 nm	RibbonFET	Intel	[454]
2GAP	?	2025	2 nm	MBCFET	Samsung	[438]
N2	?	2025	2 nm	GAAFET	TSMC	[447][451]
Samsung 1.4 nm	?	2027	1.4 nm	?	Samsung	[456]

Gate count

In certain applications, the term gate count is preferred over the term transistor count. It refers to the number of logic gates built with transistors and other electronic devices needed to implement a design.^{[457][458][459][460]}

See also

• Dennard scaling
• Electronics industry
• Integrated circuit
• List of best-selling electronic devices
• List of semiconductor scale examples
• MOSFET
• Semiconductor
• Semiconductor device
• Semiconductor device fabrication
• Semiconductor industry
• Transistor
• Cerebras Systems

Notes

1. Microprocessor specialised for processing machine learning workloads, pioneered by UK based semiconductor startup Graphcore.
2. Declassified 1998
3. The TMS1000 is a microcontroller, the transistor count includes memory and input/output controllers, not just the CPU.
4. 2668 without depletion mode pull-up transistors
5. 3,510 without depletion mode pull-up transistors
6. 6,813 without depletion mode pull-up transistors
7. 3,900,000,000 core chiplet die, 2,090,000,000 I/O die
8. Estimate
9. Versal Premium are confirmed to be shipping in 1H 2021 but nothing was mentioned about the VP1802 in particular. Usually Xilinx makes separate news for the release of its biggest devices so the VP1802 is likely to be released later.
10. "Intelligence Processing Unit"

References

1. Hruska, Joel (August 2019). "Cerebras Systems Unveils 1.2 Trillion Transistor Wafer-Scale Processor for AI". extremetech.com. Retrieved September 6, 2019.
2. Feldman, Michael (August 2019). "Machine Learning chip breaks new ground with waferscale integration". nextplatform.com. Retrieved September 6, 2019.
3. Cutress, Ian (August 2019). "Hot Chips 31 Live Blogs: Cerebras' 1.2 Trillion Transistor Deep Learning Processor". anandtech.com. Archived from the original on August 20, 2019. Retrieved September 6, 2019.
4. "A Look at Cerebras Wafer-Scale Engine: Half Square Foot Silicon Chip". WikiChip Fuse. November 16, 2019. Retrieved December 2, 2019.
5. Everett, Joseph (August 26, 2020). "World's largest CPU has 850,000 7 nm cores that are optimized for AI and 2.6 trillion transistors". TechReportArticles.
6. "John Gustafson's answer to How many individual transistors are in the world's most powerful supercomputer?". Quora. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
7. Pires, Francisco (October 5, 2022). "Water-Based Chips Could be Breakthrough for Neural Networking, AI: Wetware has gained an entirely new meaning". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved October 5, 2022.
8. Laws, David (April 2, 2018). "13 Sextillion & Counting: The Long & Winding Road to the Most Frequently Manufactured Human Artifact in History". Computer History Museum.
9. Handy, Jim (May 26, 2014). "How Many Transistors Have Ever Shipped?". Forbes.
10. "1971: Microprocessor Integrates CPU Function onto a Single Chip". The Silicon Engine. Computer History Museum. Retrieved September 4, 2019.
11. Holt, Ray. "World's First Microprocessor". Retrieved March 5, 2016. 1st fully integrated chip set microprocessor
12. "Alpha 21364 - Microarchitectures - Compaq - WikiChip". en.wikichip.org. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
13. Holt, Ray M. (1998). The F14A Central Air Data Computer and the LSI Technology State-of-the-Art in 1968. p. 8.
14. Holt, Ray M. (2013). "F14 TomCat MOS-LSI Chip Set". First Microprocessor. Archived from the original on November 6, 2020. Retrieved November 6, 2020.
15. Ken Shirriff. "The Texas Instruments TMX 1795: the (almost) first, forgotten microprocessor". 2015.
16. Ryoichi Mori; Hiroaki Tajima; Morihiko Tajima; Yoshikuni Okada (October 1977). "Microprocessors in Japan". Euromicro Newsletter. 3 (4): 50–7. doi:10.1016/0303-1268(77)90111-0.
17. "NEC 751 (uCOM-4)". The Antique Chip Collector's Page. Archived from the original on May 25, 2011. Retrieved June 11, 2010.
18. "1970s: Development and evolution of microprocessors" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
19. "1973: 12-bit engine-control microprocessor (Toshiba)" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
20. "Low Bandwidth Timeline – Semiconductor". Texas Instruments. Retrieved June 22, 2016.
21. Ken Shirriff. "Inside the HP Nanoprocessor: a high-speed processor that can't even add". 2020. quote: "By my count, the Nanoprocessor has 4639 transistors. ... 3829 unique transistors. Of these, 1061 act as pull-ups, while 2668 are active. In comparison, the 6502 has 4237 transistors, of which 3218 are active. The 8008 has 3500 transistors and the Motorola 6800 has 4100 transistors."
22. "The MOS 6502 and the Best Layout Guy in the World". research.swtch.com. January 3, 2011. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
23. Shirriff, Ken (January 2023). "Counting the transistors in the 8086 processor: it's harder than you might think".
24. "Digital History: ZILOG Z8000 (APRIL 1979)". OLD-COMPUTERS.COM : The Museum. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
25. "Chip Hall of Fame: Motorola MC68000 Microprocessor". IEEE Spectrum. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. June 30, 2017. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
26. Microprocessors: 1971 to 1976 Archived December 3, 2013, at the Wayback Machine Christiansen
27. "Microprocessors 1976 to 1981". weber.edu. Archived from the original on December 3, 2013. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
28. "W65C816S 16-bit Core". www.westerndesigncenter.com. Retrieved September 12, 2017.
29. Demone, Paul (November 9, 2000). "ARM's Race to World Domination". real world technologies. Retrieved July 20, 2015.
30. Hand, Tom. "The Harris RTX 2000 Microcontroller" (PDF). mpeforth.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
31. "Forth chips list". UltraTechnology. March 15, 2001. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
32. Koopman, Philip J. (1989). "4.4 Architecture of the Novix NC4016". Stack Computers: the new wave. Ellis Horwood Series in Computers and Their Applications. Carnegie Mellon University. ISBN 978-0745804187. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
33. "Fujitsu SPARC". cpu-collection.de. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
34. Kimura S, Komoto Y, Yano Y (1988). "Implementation of the V60/V70 and its FRM function". IEEE Micro. 8 (2): 22–36. doi:10.1109/40.527. S2CID 9507994.
35. "VL2333 - VTI - WikiChip". en.wikichip.org. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
36. Inayoshi H, Kawasaki I, Nishimukai T, Sakamura K (1988). "Realization of Gmicro/200". IEEE Micro. 8 (2): 12–21. doi:10.1109/40.526. S2CID 36938046.
37. Bosshart, P.; Hewes, C.; Mi-Chang Chang; Kwok-Kit Chau; Hoac, C.; Houston, T.; Kalyan, V.; Lusky, S.; Mahant-Shetti, S.; Matzke, D.; Ruparel, K.; Ching-Hao Shaw; Sridhar, T.; Stark, D. (October 1987). "A 553K-Transistor LISP Processor Chip". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. 22 (5): 202–3. doi:10.1109/ISSCC.1987.1157084. S2CID 195841103.
38. Fahlén, Lennart E.; Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (1987). "3. Hardware requirements for artificial intelligence § Lisp Machines: TI Explorer". Arms and Artificial Intelligence: Weapon and Arms Control Applications of Advanced Computing. SIPRI Monograph Series. Oxford University Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-19-829122-0.
39. Jouppi, Norman P.; Tang, Jeffrey Y. F. (July 1989). "A 20-MIPS Sustained 32-bit CMOS Microprocessor with High Ratio of Sustained to Peak Performance". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. 24 (5): i. Bibcode:1989IJSSC..24.1348J. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.85.988. doi:10.1109/JSSC.1989.572612. WRL Research Report 89/11.
40. "The CPU shack museum". CPUshack.com. May 15, 2005. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
41. "Intel i960 Embedded Microprocessor". National High Magnetic Field Laboratory. Florida State University. March 3, 2003. Archived from the original on March 3, 2003. Retrieved June 29, 2019.
42. Venkatasawmy, Rama (2013). The Digitization of Cinematic Visual Effects: Hollywood's Coming of Age. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 198. ISBN 9780739176214.
43. Bakoglu, Grohoski, and Montoye. "The IBM RISC System/6000 processor: Hardware overview." IBM J. Research and Development. Vol. 34 No. 1, January 1990, pp. 12-22.
44. "SH Microprocessor Leading the Nomadic Era" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
45. "SH2: A Low Power RISC Micro for Consumer Applications" (PDF). Hitachi. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 10, 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
46. "HARP-1: A 120 MHz Superscalar PA-RISC Processor" (PDF). Hitachi. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 23, 2016. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
47. White and Dhawan. "POWER2: next generation of the RISC System/6000 family" IBM J. Research and Development. Vol. 38 No. 5, September 1994, pp. 493-502.
48. "ARM7 Statistics". Poppyfields.net. May 27, 1994. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
49. "Forth Multiprocessor Chip MuP21". www.ultratechnology.com. Retrieved September 6, 2019. MuP21 has a 21-bit CPU core, a memory coprocessor, and a video coprocessor
50. "F21 CPU". www.ultratechnology.com. Retrieved September 6, 2019. F21 offers video I/O, analog I/O, serial network I/O, and a parallel I/O port on chip. F21 has a transistor count of about 15,000 vs about 7,000 for MuP21.
51. "Ars Technica: PowerPC on Apple: An Architectural History, Part I - Page 2 - (8/2004)". archive.arstechnica.com. Retrieved August 11, 2020.
52. Gary et al. (1994). "The PowerPC 603 microprocessor: a low-power design for portable applications." Proceedings of COMPCON 94. DOI: 10.1109/CMPCON.1994.282894
53. Slaton et al. (1995). "The PowerPC 603e microprocessor: an enhanced, low-power, superscalar microprocessor." Proceedings of ICCD '95 International Conference on Computer Design. DOI: 10.1109/ICCD.1995.528810
54. Bowhill, William J. et al. (1995). "Circuit Implementation of a 300-MHz 64-bit Second-generation CMOS Alpha CPU". Digital Technical Journal, Volume 7, Number 1, pp. 100–118.
55. "Intel Pentium Pro 180". hw-museum.cz. February 20, 2015. Retrieved September 8, 2019.
56. Kozierok, Charles M. (April 17, 2001). "PC Guide Intel Pentium Pro ("P6")". The PC Guide. Archived from the original on April 14, 2001. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
57. Gaddis, N.; Lotz, J. (November 1996). "A 64-b quad-issue CMOS RISC microprocessor". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 31 (11): pp. 1697–1702.
58. Bouchard, Gregg. "Design objectives of the 0.35 μm Alpha 21164 Microprocessor". IEEE Hot Chips Symposium, August 1996, IEEE Computer Society.
59. Ulf Samuelsson. "Transistor count of common uCs?". www.embeddedrelated.com. Retrieved September 8, 2019. IIRC, The AVR core is 12,000 gates, and the megaAVR core is 20,000 gates. Each gate is 4 transistors. The chip is considerably larger since the memory uses quite a lot.
60. Gronowski, Paul E. et al. (May 1998). "High-performance microprocessor design". IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits 33 (5): pp. 676–686.
61. Nakagawa, Norio; Arakawa, Fumio (April 1999). "Entertainment Systems and High-Performance Processor SH-4" (PDF). Hitachi Review. 48 (2): 58–63. Retrieved March 18, 2023.
62. Nishii, O.; Arakawa, F.; Ishibashi, K.; Nakano, S.; Shimura, T.; Suzuki, K.; Tachibana, M.; Totsuka, Y.; Tsunoda, T.; Uchiyama, K.; Yamada, T.; Hattori, T.; Maejima, H.; Nakagawa, N.; Narita, S.; Seki, M.; Shimazaki, Y.; Satomura, R.; Takasuga, T.; Hasegawa, A. (1998). "A 200 MHZ 1.2 W 1.4 GFLOPS microprocessor with graphic operation unit". 1998 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers, ISSCC. First Edition (Cat. No. 98CH36156). IEEE. pp. 18.1-1 - 18.1-11. doi:10.1109/ISSCC.1998.672469. ISBN 0-7803-4344-1. S2CID 45392734.
63. Diefendorff, Keith (April 19, 1999). "Sony's Emotionally Charged Chip: Killer Floating-Point "Emotion Engine" To Power PlayStation 2000" (PDF). Microprocessor Report. 13 (5). S2CID 29649747. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 28, 2019. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
64. Hennessy, John L.; Patterson, David A. (May 29, 2002). Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach (3 ed.). Morgan Kaufmann. p. 491. ISBN 978-0-08-050252-6. Retrieved April 9, 2013.
65. "NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX GPU Review". PC Perspective. June 22, 2005. Retrieved June 18, 2019.
66. Ando, H.; Yoshida, Y.; Inoue, A.; Sugiyama, I.; Asakawa, T.; Morita, K.; Muta, T.; Otokurumada, T.; Okada, S.; Yamashita, H.; Satsukawa, Y.; Konmoto, A.; Yamashita, R.; Sugiyama, H. (2003). "A 1.3GHz fifth generation SPARC64 microprocessor". Proceedings of the 40th Annual Design Automation Conference. Design Automation Conference. pp. 702–705. doi:10.1145/775832.776010. ISBN 1-58113-688-9.
67. Krewell, Kevin (21 October 2002). "Fujitsu's SPARC64 V Is Real Deal". Microprocessor Report.
68. "Intel Pentium M Processor 1.60 GHZ, 1M Cache, 400 MHZ FSB Product Specifications".
69. "EE+GS". PS2 Dev Wiki.
70. "Sony MARKETING (JAPAN) ANNOUNCES LAUNCH OF "PSX" DESR-5000 and DESR-7000 TOWARDS THE END OF 2003" (Press release). Sony. November 27, 2003.
71. "EMOTION ENGINE AND GRAPHICS SYNTHESIZER USED IN THE CORE OF PLAYSTATION BECOME ONE CHIP" (PDF). Sony. April 21, 2003. Retrieved March 19, 2023.
72. "Sony PSX's 90nm CPU is 'not 90nm'". The Register. January 30, 2004.
73. "Semi Insights stands by 'not 90-nm' description of PSX chip". EE Times. February 5, 2004.
74. "Intel Pentium M Processor 760 (2M Cache, 2.00A GHZ, 533 MHZ FSB) Product Specifications".
75. Fujitsu Limited (August 2004). SPARC64 V Processor For UNIX Server.
76. "A Glimpse Inside The Cell Processor". Gamasutra. July 13, 2006. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
77. "Intel Pentium D Processor 920". Intel. Retrieved January 5, 2023.
78. "PRESS KIT — Dual-core Intel Itanium Processor". Intel. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
79. Toepelt, Bert (January 8, 2009). "AMD Phenom II X4: 45nm Benchmarked — The Phenom II And AMD's Dragon Platform". TomsHardware.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
80. "ARM (Advanced RISC Machines) Processors". EngineersGarage.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
81. "Panasonic starts to sell a New-generation UniPhier System LSI". Panasonic. October 10, 2007. Retrieved July 2, 2019.
82. "SPARC64 VI Extensions" page 56, Fujitsu Limited, Release 1.3, 27 March 2007
83. Morgan, Timothy Prickett (17 July 2008). "Fujitsu and Sun Flex Their Quads with New Sparc Server Lineup". The Unix Guardian, Vol. 8, No. 27.
84. Takumi Maruyama (2009). SPARC64 VIIIfx: Fujitsu's New Generation Octo Core Processor for PETA Scale computing (PDF). Proceedings of Hot Chips 21. IEEE Computer Society. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 8, 2010. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
85. "Intel Atom N450 specifications". Intel. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
86. "Intel Atom D510 specifications". Intel. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
87. Stokes, Jon (February 10, 2010). "Sun's 1 billion-transistor, 16-core Niagara 3 processor". ArsTechnica.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
88. "IBM to Ship World's Fastest Microprocessor". IBM. September 1, 2010. Archived from the original on September 5, 2010. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
89. "Intel to deliver first computer chip with two billion transistors". AFP. February 5, 2008. Archived from the original on May 20, 2011. Retrieved February 5, 2008.
90. "Intel Previews Intel Xeon 'Nehalem-EX' Processor." May 26, 2009. Retrieved on May 28, 2009.
91. Morgan, Timothy Prickett (November 21, 2011), "Fujitsu parades 16-core Sparc64 super stunner", The Register, retrieved December 8, 2011
92. Angelini, Chris (November 14, 2011). "Intel Core i7-3960X Review: Sandy Bridge-E And X79 Express". TomsHardware.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
93. "IDF2012 Mark Bohr, Intel Senior Fellow" (PDF).
94. "Images of SPARC64" (PDF). fujitsu.com. Retrieved August 29, 2017.
95. "Intel's Atom Architecture: The Journey Begins". AnandTech. Archived from the original on January 22, 2009. Retrieved April 4, 2010.
96. "Intel Xeon Phi SE10X". TechPowerUp. Retrieved July 20, 2015.
97. Shimpi, Lal. "The Haswell Review: Intel Core i7-4770K & i5-4670K Tested". anandtech. Archived from the original on June 7, 2013. Retrieved November 20, 2014.
98. "Dimmick, Frank (August 29, 2014). "Intel Core i7 5960X Extreme Edition Review". Overclockers Club. Retrieved August 29, 2014.
99. "Apple A8X". NotebookCheck. Retrieved July 20, 2015.
100. "Intel Readying 15-core Xeon E7 v2". AnandTech. Archived from the original on February 12, 2014. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
101. "Intel Xeon E5-2600 v3 Processor Overview: Haswell-EP Up to 18 Cores". pcper. September 8, 2014. Retrieved January 29, 2015.
102. "Intel's Broadwell-U arrives aboard 15W, 28W mobile processors". TechReport. January 5, 2015. Retrieved January 5, 2015.
103. "Oracle Cranks up the Cores to 32 with Sparc M7 Chip". EnterpriseTech. August 13, 2014.
104. "Broadwell-E: Intel Core i7-6950X, 6900K, 6850K & 6800K Review". Tom's Hardware. May 30, 2016. Retrieved April 12, 2017.
105. "The Broadwell-E Review". PC Gamer. July 8, 2016. Retrieved April 12, 2017.
106. "HUAWEI TO UNVEIL KIRIN 970 SOC WITH AI UNIT, 5.5 BILLION TRANSISTORS AND 1.2 GBPS LTE SPEED AT IFA 2017". firstpost.com. September 1, 2017. Retrieved November 18, 2018.
107. "Broadwell-EP Architecture - Intel Xeon E5-2600 v4 Broadwell-EP Review". Tom's Hardware. March 31, 2016. Retrieved April 4, 2016.
108. "About the ZipCPU". zipcpu.com. Retrieved September 10, 2019. As of ORCONF, 2016, the ZipCPU used between 1286 and 4926 6-LUTs, depending upon how it is configured.
109. "Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998)". NotebookCheck. Retrieved September 23, 2017.
110. Takahashi, Dean (January 3, 2017). "Qualcomm's Snapdragon 835 will debut with 3 billion transistors and a 10nm manufacturing process". VentureBeat.
111. Singh, Teja (2017). "3.2 Zen: A Next-Generation High-Performance x86 Core". Proc. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. pp. 52–54.
112. Cutress, Ian (February 22, 2017). "AMD Launches Zen". Anandtech.com. Archived from the original on February 22, 2017. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
113. "Ryzen 5 1600 - AMD". Wikichip.org. April 20, 2018. Retrieved December 9, 2018.
114. "Kirin 970 – HiSilicon". Wikichip. March 1, 2018. Retrieved November 8, 2018.
115. Leadbetter, Richard (April 6, 2017). "Inside the next Xbox: Project Scorpio tech revealed". Eurogamer. Retrieved May 3, 2017.
116. "Intel Xeon Platinum 8180". TechPowerUp. December 1, 2018. Retrieved December 2, 2018.
117. Pellerano, Stefano (March 2, 2022). "Circuit Design to Harness the Power of Scaling and Integration (ISSCC 2022)". YouTube.
118. Lee, Y. "SiFive Freedom SoCs : Industry's First Open Source RISC V Chips" (PDF). HotChips 29 IOT/Embedded. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 9, 2020. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
119. "Documents at Fujitsu" (PDF). fujitsu.com. Retrieved August 29, 2017.
120. Schmerer, Kai (November 5, 2018). "iPad Pro 2018: A12X-Prozessor bietet deutlich mehr Leistung". ZDNet.de (in German).
121. "Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies Announces Commercial Shipment of Qualcomm Centriq 2400 – The World's First 10nm Server Processor and Highest Performance Arm-based Server Processor Family Ever Designed". Qualcomm. Retrieved November 9, 2017.
122. "Qualcomm Snapdragon 1000 for laptops could pack 8.5 billion transistors". techradar. Retrieved September 23, 2017.
123. "Spotted: Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Wafer on 7nm". AnandTech. Archived from the original on December 7, 2018. Retrieved December 6, 2018.
124. "HiSilicon Kirin 710". Notebookcheck. September 19, 2018. Retrieved November 24, 2018.
125. Yang, Daniel; Wegner, Stacy (September 21, 2018). "Apple iPhone Xs Max Teardown". TechInsights. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
126. "Apple's A12 Bionic is the first 7-nanometer smartphone chip". Engadget. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
127. "Kirin 980 – HiSilicon". Wikichip. November 8, 2018. Retrieved November 8, 2018.
128. "Qualcomm Snapdragon 8180: 7nm SoC SDM1000 With 8.5 Billion Transistors To Challenge Apple A12 Bionic Chipset". dailyhunt. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
129. Zafar, Ramish (October 30, 2018). "Apple's A12X Has 10 Billion Transistors, 90% Performance Boost & 7-Core GPU". Wccftech.
130. "Fujitsu began to produce Japan's billions of super-calculations with the strongest ARM processor A64FX". firstxw.com. April 16, 2019. Archived from the original on June 20, 2019. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
131. "Fujitsu Successfully Triples the Power Output of Gallium-Nitride Transistors". Fujitsu. August 22, 2018. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
132. "Hot Chips 30: Nvidia Xavier SoC". fuse.wikichip.org. September 18, 2018. Retrieved December 6, 2018.
133. Frumusanu, Andrei. "The Samsung Galaxy S10+ Snapdragon & Exynos Review: Almost Perfect, Yet So Flawed". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on March 29, 2019. Retrieved February 19, 2021.
134. "Zen 2 Microarchitecture". WikiChip. Retrieved February 21, 2023.
135. "AMD Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 3700X Review: Zen 2 and 7nm Unleashed". Tom's Hardware. July 7, 2019. Retrieved October 19, 2019.
136. Frumusanu, Andrei. "The Huawei Mate 30 Pro Review: Top Hardware without Google?". AnandTech. Archived from the original on January 2, 2020. Retrieved January 2, 2020.
137. Zafar, Ramish (September 10, 2019). "Apple A13 For iPhone 11 Has 8.5 Billion Transistors, Quad-Core GPU". Wccftech. Retrieved September 11, 2019.
138. Introducing iPhone 11 Pro — Apple Youtube Video, retrieved September 11, 2019^{[dead YouTube link]}
139. "Hot Chips 2020 Live Blog: IBM z15". AnandTech. August 17, 2020. Archived from the original on August 17, 2020.
140. Broekhuijsen, Niels (October 23, 2019). "AMD's 64-Core EPYC and Ryzen CPUs Stripped: A Detailed Inside Look". Retrieved October 24, 2019.
141. Mujtaba, Hassan (October 22, 2019). "AMD 2nd Gen EPYC Rome Processors Feature A Gargantuan 39.54 Billion Transistors, IO Die Pictured in Detail". Retrieved October 24, 2019.
142. Friedman, Alan (December 14, 2019). "5nm Kirin 1020 SoC tipped for next year's Huawei Mate 40 line". Phone Arena. Retrieved December 23, 2019.
143. Verheyde, Arne (December 5, 2019). "Amazon Compares 64-core ARM Graviton2 to Intel's Xeon". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved December 6, 2019.
144. Morgan, Timothy Prickett (December 3, 2019). "Finally: AWS Gives Servers A Real Shot In The Arm". The Next Platform. Retrieved December 6, 2019.
145. Friedman, Alan (October 10, 2019). "Qualcomm will reportedly introduce the Snapdragon 865 SoC as soon as next month". Phone Arena. Retrieved February 19, 2021.
146. "Xiaomi Mi 10 Teardown Analysis | TechInsights". www.techinsights.com. Retrieved February 19, 2021.
147. "The Linley Group - TI Jacinto Accelerates Level 3 ADAS". www.linleygroup.com. Retrieved February 12, 2021.
148. "Apple unveils A14 Bionic processor with 40% faster CPU and 11.8 billion transistors". Venturebeat. November 10, 2020. Retrieved November 24, 2020.
149. "Apple says new Arm-based M1 chip offers the 'longest battery life ever in a Mac'". The Verge. November 10, 2020. Retrieved November 11, 2020.
150. Ikoba, Jed John (October 23, 2020). "Multiple benchmark tests rank the Kirin 9000 as one of the most-powerful chipset yet". Gizmochina. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
151. Frumusanu, Andrei. "Huawei Announces Mate 40 Series: Powered by 15.3bn Transistors 5nm Kirin 9000". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on October 22, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
152. Burd, Thomas (2022). "2.7 Zen3: The AMD 2nd-Generation 7nm x86-64 Microprocessor Core". Proc. IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. pp. 54–56.
153. "For a long time, Intel once again named the number of transistors in the chip. There are supposed to be about 6 billion for Rocket Lake-S. Coffee Lake-S is supposed to have about 4 billion. The chip with eight cores is about 30 % bigger than the predecessor with ten core". twitter. Retrieved March 16, 2021.
154. "Intel's Core i7-11700K 'Rocket Lake' Delidded: A Big Die, Revealed". tomshardware. March 12, 2021. Retrieved March 16, 2021.
155. "Intel's 14nm density". www.techcenturion.com. November 26, 2019. Retrieved November 26, 2019.
156. "AMD Ryzen 7 5800H Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved September 20, 2021.
157. "AMD Epyc 7763 specifications". August 2023.
158. Shankland, Stephen. "Apple's A15 Bionic chip powers iPhone 13 with 15 billion transistors, new graphics and AI". CNET. Retrieved September 20, 2021.
159. "Apple iPhone 13 Pro Teardown | TechInsights". www.techinsights.com. Retrieved September 29, 2021.
160. "Apple unveils M1 Pro and M1 Max chips for latest MacBook Pro laptops". VentureBeat. October 18, 2021.
161. "Apple Announces M1 Pro & M1 Max: Giant New Arm SoCs with All-Out Performance". AnanadTech. Archived from the original on October 18, 2021. Retrieved December 2, 2021.
162. "Apple unveils new computer chips amid shortage". BBC News. October 19, 2021.
163. "Apple Joins 3D-Fabric Portfolio with M1 Ultra?". TechInsights. Retrieved July 8, 2022.
164. "Hot Chips 2020 live blog". AnandTech. August 17, 2020. Archived from the original on August 17, 2020.
165. "Phantom X2 Series 5G powered by MediaTek Dimensity 9000". Mediatek. December 12, 2022.
166. "MediaTek Dimensity 9000". Mediatek. January 21, 2023.
167. "Apple A16 Bionic announced for the iPhone 14 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro Max". NotebookCheck. September 7, 2022.
168. "iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max Only Models to Get New A16 Chip". CNET. September 7, 2022.
169. "The Apple 2022 Fall iPhone Event Live Blog". AnandTech. September 7, 2022. Archived from the original on September 8, 2022.
170. "Apple unveils M1 Ultra, the world's most powerful chip for a personal computer". Apple Newsroom. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
171. Shankland, Stephen. "Meet Apple's Enormous 20-Core M1 Ultra Processor, the Brains in the New Mac Studio Machine". CNET. Retrieved March 9, 2022.
172. "AMD releases Milan-X CPUs". AnandTech. March 21, 2022. Archived from the original on March 29, 2022.
173. "IBM Telum Hot Chips slide deck" (PDF). August 23, 2021.
174. "IBM z16 announcement". April 5, 2022.
175. "Apple unveils M2, taking the breakthrough performance and capabilities of M1 even further". Apple. June 6, 2022.
176. "MediaTek Dimensity 9200: New flagship chipset debuts with ARM Cortex-X3 CPU and Immortalis-G715 GPU cores built around TSMC N4P node". NotebookCheck. November 8, 2022.
177. "Dimensity 9200 specs". Mediatek. November 8, 2022.
178. "Dimensity 9200 presentation". Mediatek. November 8, 2022.
179. "AMD EPYC Genoa Gaps Intel Xeon in Stunning Fashion". ServeTheHome. November 10, 2022.
180. "AMD Aims to Break the ZettaFLOP Barrier by 2035, Lays Down Next-Gen Plans to Resolve Efficiency Problems". Appuals. February 21, 2023.
181. "AMD Lays The Path To Zettascale Computing: Talks CPU & GPU Performance Plus Efficiency Trends, Next-Gen Chiplet Packaging & More". WCCFtech. February 20, 2023.
182. "AMD EPYC Genoa & SP5 Platform Leaked – 5nm Zen 4 CCD Measures Roughly 72mm, 12 CCD Package at 5428mm2, Up To 700W Peak Socket Power". WCCFtech. August 17, 2021.
183. Syed, Areej (August 17, 2021). "Leaked AMD Epyc Genoa Docs Reveal 96 Cores, Max TDP of 700W, and Zen 4 Chiplet Dimensions". HardwareTimes.
184. "Kirin 9000S has about 6 billion fewer transistors than Kirin 9000, but its performance is stronger! How did you do it?". iNews. September 13, 2023. Retrieved September 24, 2023.
185. "Apple Announces M4 SoC: Latest and Greatest Starts on 2024 iPad Pro". Anandtech. May 7, 2024. Archived from the original on May 7, 2024.
186. "Apple introduces new M3 chip lineup, starting with the M3, M3 Pro, and M3 Max". Arstechnica. October 31, 2023.
187. Goldman, Joshua. "Apple A17 Pro Chip: The New Brain Inside iPhone 15 Pro, Pro Max". CNET. Retrieved September 12, 2023.
188. "4th Gen Intel Xeon Scalable Sapphire Rapids Leaps Forward". ServeTheHome. January 10, 2023.
189. "Wie vier Dies zu einem "monolithischen" Sapphire Rapids werden". hardwareLUXX. February 21, 2022.
190. "Apple unveils M2 Pro and M2 Max: next-generation chips for next-level workflows". Apple (Press release). January 17, 2023.
191. "Apple introduces M2 Ultra" (Press release). Apple. June 5, 2023.
192. "AMD EPYC Bergamo Launched 128 Cores Per Socket and 1024 Threads Per 1U". ServeTheHome. June 13, 2023.
193. "AMD Instinct MI300A Accelerators". AMD. Retrieved January 14, 2024.
194. Alcorn, Paul (December 6, 2023). "AMD unveils Instinct MI300X GPU and MI300A APU, claims up to 1.6X lead over Nvidia's competing GPUs". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved January 14, 2024.
195. "China creates world's thinnest chip with 5931 transistors". 2025.
196. Williams, Chris. "Nvidia's Tesla P100 has 15 billion transistors, 21TFLOPS". www.theregister.co.uk. Retrieved August 12, 2019.
197. "Famous Graphics Chips: NEC μPD7220 Graphics Display Controller". IEEE Computer Society. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. August 22, 2018. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
198. "GPU History: Hitachi ARTC HD63484. The second graphics processor". IEEE Computer Society. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. October 7, 2018. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
199. "Big Book of Amiga Hardware".
200. Russell, Jesse; Cohn, Ronald (May 2012). MOS Technology Agnus. Book on Demand. ISBN 978-5511916842.
201. "30 Years of Console Gaming". Klinger Photography. August 20, 2017. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
202. "Sega Saturn". MAME. Retrieved July 18, 2019.
203. "ASIC CHIPS ARE INDUSTRY'S GAME WINNERS". The Washington Post. September 18, 1995. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
204. "Is it Time to Rename the GPU?". Jon Peddie Research. IEEE Computer Society. July 9, 2018. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
205. "FastForward Sony Taps LSI Logic for PlayStation Video Game CPU Chip". FastForward. Retrieved January 29, 2014.
206. "Reality Co-Processor − The Power In Nintendo64" (PDF). Silicon Graphics. August 26, 1997. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 19, 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2019.
207. "Imagination PowerVR PCX2 GPU". VideoCardz.net. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
208. Lilly, Paul (May 19, 2009). "From Voodoo to GeForce: The Awesome History of 3D Graphics". PC Gamer. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
209. "3D accelerator database". Vintage 3D. Retrieved July 21, 2019.
210. "RIVA128 Datasheet". SGS Thomson Microelectronics. Retrieved July 21, 2019.
211. Singer, Graham (April 3, 2013). "History of the Modern Graphics Processor, Part 2". TechSpot. Retrieved July 21, 2019.
212. "Remembering the Sega Dreamcast". Bit-Tech. September 29, 2009. Retrieved June 18, 2019.
213. Weinberg, Neil (September 7, 1998). "Comeback kid". Forbes. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
214. Charles, Bertie (1998). "Sega's New Dimension". Forbes. 162 (5–9). Forbes Incorporated: 206. The chip, etched in 0.25-micron detail — state-of-the-art for graphics processors — fits 10 million transistors
215. Hagiwara, Shiro; Oliver, Ian (November–December 1999). "Sega Dreamcast: Creating a Unified Entertainment World". IEEE Micro. 19 (6). IEEE Computer Society: 29–35. doi:10.1109/40.809375. Archived from the original on August 23, 2000. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
216. "VideoLogic Neon 250 4MB". VideoCardz.net. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
217. Shimpi, Anand Lal (November 21, 1998). "Fall Comdex '98 Coverage". AnandTech. Archived from the original on March 10, 2011. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
218. "EMOTION ENGINE AND GRAPHICS SYNTHESIZER USED IN THE CORE OF PLAYSTATION BECOME ONE CHIP" (PDF). Sony. April 21, 2003. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
219. "NVIDIA NV10 A3 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
220. IGN Staff (November 4, 2000). "Gamecube Versus PlayStation 2". IGN. Retrieved November 22, 2015.
221. "NVIDIA NV2A GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved July 21, 2019.
222. "ATI Xenos GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
223. International, GamesIndustry (July 14, 2005). "TSMC to manufacture X360 GPU". Eurogamer. Retrieved August 22, 2006.
224. "NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 65nm Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
225. "PS3 Graphics Chip Goes 65nm in Fall". Edge Online. June 26, 2008. Archived from the original on July 25, 2008.
226. "NVIDIA's 1.4 Billion Transistor GPU: GT200 Arrives as the GeForce GTX 280 & 260". AnandTech.com. Archived from the original on June 17, 2008. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
227. "The Radeon HD 4850 & 4870: AMD Wins at $199 and $299". AnandTech.com. Archived from the original on May 30, 2012. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
228. Glaskowsky, Peter. "ATI and Nvidia face off-obliquely". CNET. Archived from the original on January 27, 2012. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
229. Woligroski, Don (December 22, 2011). "AMD Radeon HD 7970". TomsHardware.com. Retrieved August 9, 2014.
230. "NVIDIA Kepler GK110 Architecture" (PDF). NVIDIA. 2012. Retrieved January 9, 2024.
231. Smith, Ryan (November 12, 2012). "NVIDIA Launches Tesla K20 & K20X: GK110 Arrives At Last". AnandTech. Archived from the original on November 13, 2012.
232. "Whitepaper: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680" (PDF). NVIDIA. 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 17, 2012.
233. Kan, Michael (August 18, 2020). "Xbox Series X May Give Your Wallet a Workout Due to High Chip Manufacturing Costs". PCMag. Retrieved September 5, 2020.
234. "AMD Xbox One GPU". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
235. "AMD PlayStation 4 GPU". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
236. "AMD Xbox One S GPU". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
237. "AMD PlayStation 4 Pro GPU". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
238. Smith, Ryan (June 29, 2016). "The AMD RX 480 Preview". Anandtech.com. Archived from the original on June 30, 2016. Retrieved February 22, 2017.
239. Schor, David (July 22, 2018). "VLSI 2018: GlobalFoundries 12nm Leading-Performance, 12LP". WikiChip Fuse. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
240. Harris, Mark (April 5, 2016). "Inside Pascal: NVIDIA's Newest Computing Platform". Nvidia developer blog.
241. "GPU Database: Pascal". TechPowerUp. July 26, 2023.
242. "AMD Xbox One X GPU". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
243. "Radeon's next-generation Vega architecture" (PDF).
244. Durant, Luke; Giroux, Olivier; Harris, Mark; Stam, Nick (May 10, 2017). "Inside Volta: The World's Most Advanced Data Center GPU". Nvidia developer blog.
245. "NVIDIA TURING GPU ARCHITECTURE: Graphics Reinvented" (PDF). Nvidia. 2018. Retrieved June 28, 2019.
246. "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
247. "NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
248. "AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
249. "AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT". www.techpowerup.com. Retrieved February 5, 2020.
250. "AMD Arcturus GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved November 10, 2022.
251. Walton, Jared (May 14, 2020). "Nvidia Unveils Its Next-Generation 7nm Ampere A100 GPU for Data Centers, and It's Absolutely Massive". Tom's Hardware.
252. "Nvidia Ampere Architecture". www.nvidia.com. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
253. "NVIDIA GA102 GPU Specs". Techpowerup. Retrieved September 5, 2020.
254. "'Giant Step into the Future': NVIDIA CEO Unveils GeForce RTX 30 Series GPUs". www.nvidia.com. September 2020. Retrieved September 5, 2020.
255. "NVIDIA GA103 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved March 21, 2023.
256. "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved September 20, 2021.
257. "NVIDIA GA106 specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved March 22, 2023.
258. "NVIDIA GA107 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved March 21, 2023.
259. "MI250X die size estimates". Twitter. November 17, 2021.
260. "AMD Instinct MI250 Professional Graphics Card". VideoCardz. November 2, 2022.
261. "AMD's Instinct MI250X OAM Card Pictured: Aldebaran's Massive Die Revealed". Tom's Hardware. November 17, 2021.
262. "AMD MI250X and Toplogies Explained at HC34". ServeTheHome. August 22, 2022.
263. "Nvidia Launches Hopper H100 GPU, New DGXs and Grace Superchips". HPCWire. March 22, 2022. Retrieved March 23, 2022.
264. "NVIDIA details AD102 GPU, up to 18432 CUDA cores, 76.3B transistors and 608 mm2". VideoCardz. September 20, 2022.
265. "NVIDIA confirms Ada 102/103/104 GPU specs, AD104 has more transistors than GA102". VideoCardz. September 23, 2022.
266. "Alleged Nvidia AD106 and AD107 GPU Pics, Specs, Die Sizes Revealed". Tom's Hardware. February 3, 2023.
267. "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti "AD106-350" GPU Pictured, Uses Samsung GDDR6 Dies". WCCFtech. April 28, 2023.
268. "NVIDIA's Smallest Ada GPU, The AD107-400, For GeForce RTX 4060 GPUs Pictured". WCCFtech. May 21, 2023.
269. "AMD Unveils World's Most Advanced Gaming Graphics Cards, Built on Groundbreaking AMD RDNA 3 Architecture with Chiplet Design". AMD (Press release). November 3, 2022.
270. "AMD Announces the $999 Radeon RX 7900 XTX... (endnote RX-819)". TechPowerUp. November 4, 2022.
271. "AMD Navi 31 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved November 7, 2023.
272. "AMD Navi 32 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved November 7, 2023.
273. "AMD Navi 33 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved March 21, 2023.
274. "AMD Has a GPU to Rival Nvidia's H100". HPCWire. June 13, 2023. Retrieved June 14, 2023.
275. "AMD Aqua Vanjaram Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved January 14, 2024.
276. "NVIDIA Blackwell Platform Arrives to Power a New Era of Computing" (Press release). March 18, 2024.
277. "NVIDIA GB202 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
278. "NVIDIA GB203 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
279. "NVIDIA GB205 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
280. "NVIDIA GB206 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
281. "NVIDIA GB207 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
282. "AMD Navi 44 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
283. "AMD Navi 48 GPU Specs". TechPowerUp. Retrieved October 27, 2025.
284. "Taiwan Company UMC Delivers 65nm FPGAs to Xilinx." SDA-ASIA Thursday, November 9, 2006.
285. ""Altera's new 40nm FPGAs — 2.5 billion transistors!". pldesignline.com. Archived from the original on June 19, 2010. Retrieved January 22, 2009.
286. "Design of a High-Density SoC FPGA at 20nm" (PDF). 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 23, 2016. Retrieved July 16, 2017.
287. Maxfield, Clive (October 2011). "New Xilinx Virtex-7 2000T FPGA provides equivalent of 20 million ASIC gates". EETimes. AspenCore. Retrieved September 4, 2019.
288. Greenhill, D.; Ho, R.; Lewis, D.; Schmit, H.; Chan, K. H.; Tong, A.; Atsatt, S.; How, D.; McElheny, P. (February 2017). "3.3 a 14nm 1GHz FPGA with 2.5D transceiver integration". 2017 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC). pp. 54–55. doi:10.1109/ISSCC.2017.7870257. ISBN 978-1-5090-3758-2. S2CID 2135354.
289. Greenhill, David; Ho, Ron; Lewis, David; Schmit, Herman; Chan, Kok Hong; Tong, Andy; Atsatt, Sean; How, Dana; McElheny, Peter; Duwel, Keith; Schulz, Jeffrey; Faulkner, Darren; Iyer, Gopal; Chen, George; Phoon, Hee Kong; Lim, Han Wooi; Koay, Wei-Yee; Garibay, Ty (May 17, 2017). "3.3 A 14nm 1GHz FPGA with 2.5D transceiver integration | DeepDyve". DeepDyve. Archived from the original on May 17, 2017. Retrieved September 19, 2019.
290. Santarini, Mike (May 2014). "Xilinx Ships Industry's First 20-nm All Programmable Devices" (PDF). Xcell journal. No. 86. Xilinx. p. 14. Retrieved June 3, 2014.
291. Gianelli, Silvia (January 2015). "Xilinx Delivers the Industry's First 4M Logic Cell Device, Offering >50M Equivalent ASIC Gates and 4X More Capacity than Competitive Alternatives". www.xilinx.com. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
292. Sims, Tara (August 2019). "Xilinx Announces the World's Largest FPGA Featuring 9 Million System Logic Cells". www.xilinx.com. Retrieved August 22, 2019.
293. Verheyde, Arne (August 2019). "Xilinx Introduces World's Largest FPGA With 35 Billion Transistors". www.tomshardware.com. Retrieved August 23, 2019.
294. Cutress, Ian (August 2019). "Xilinx Announces World Largest FPGA: Virtex Ultrascale+ VU19P with 9m Cells". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on August 27, 2019. Retrieved September 25, 2019.
295. Abazovic, Fuad (May 2019). "Xilinx 7nm Versal taped out last year". Retrieved September 30, 2019.
296. Cutress, Ian (August 2019). "Hot Chips 31 Live Blogs: Xilinx Versal AI Engine". Archived from the original on August 20, 2019. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
297. Krewell, Kevin (August 2019). "Hot Chips 2019 highlights new AI strategies". Retrieved September 30, 2019.
298. Leibson, Steven (November 6, 2019). "Intel announces Intel Stratix 10 GX 10M FPGA, worlds highest capacity with 10.2 million logic elements". Retrieved November 7, 2019.
299. Verheyde, Arne (November 6, 2019). "Intel Introduces World's Largest FPGA With 43.3 Billion Transistors". Retrieved November 7, 2019.
300. Cutress, Ian (August 2020). "Hot Chips 2020 Live Blog: Xilinx Versal ACAPs". Archived from the original on August 18, 2020. Retrieved September 9, 2020.
301. "Xilinx Announces Full Production Shipments of 7nm Versal AI Core and Versal Prime Series Devices". April 27, 2021. Retrieved May 8, 2021.
302. The DRAM memory of Robert Dennard history-computer.com
303. "Late 1960s: Beginnings of MOS memory" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. January 23, 2019. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
304. "1970: Semiconductors compete with magnetic cores". Computer History Museum. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
305. "2.1.1 Flash Memory". TU Wien. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
306. Shilov, Anton. "SK Hynix Starts Production of 128-Layer 4D NAND, 176-Layer Being Developed". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on June 26, 2019. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
307. "Samsung Begins Production of 100+ Layer Sixth-Generation V-NAND Flash". PC Perspective. August 11, 2019. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
308. "1966: Semiconductor RAMs Serve High-speed Storage Needs". Computer History Museum. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
309. "Specifications for Toshiba "TOSCAL" BC-1411". Old Calculator Web Museum. Archived from the original on July 3, 2017. Retrieved May 8, 2018.
310. "Toshiba "Toscal" BC-1411 Desktop Calculator". Old Calculator Web Museum. Archived from the original on May 20, 2007.
311. Castrucci, Paul (May 10, 1966). "IBM first in IC memory" (PDF). IBM News. Vol. 3, no. 9. IBM Corporation. Retrieved June 19, 2019 – via Computer History Museum.
312. "A chronological list of Intel products. The products are sorted by date" (PDF). Intel museum. Intel Corporation. July 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 9, 2007. Retrieved July 31, 2007.
313. "1970s: SRAM evolution" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
314. Pimbley, J. (2012). Advanced CMOS Process Technology. Elsevier. p. 7. ISBN 9780323156806.
315. "Intel: 35 Years of Innovation (1968–2003)" (PDF). Intel. 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 4, 2021. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
316. Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 362–363. ISBN 9783540342588. The i1103 was manufactured on a 6-mask silicon-gate P-MOS process with 8 μm minimum features. The resulting product had a 2,400 μm² memory cell size, a die size just under 10 mm², and sold for around $21.
317. "Manufacturers in Japan enter the DRAM market and integration densities are improved" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
318. Gealow, Jeffrey Carl (August 10, 1990). "Impact of Processing Technology on DRAM Sense Amplifier Design" (PDF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. pp. 149–166. Retrieved June 25, 2019 – via CORE.
319. "Silicon Gate MOS 2102A". Intel. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
320. "One of the Most Successful 16K Dynamic RAMs: The 4116". National Museum of American History. Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
321. Component Data Catalog (PDF). Intel. 1978. pp. 3–94. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
322. "Memory". STOL (Semiconductor Technology Online). Archived from the original on November 2, 2023. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
323. "The Cutting Edge of IC Technology: The First 294,912-Bit (288K) Dynamic RAM". National Museum of American History. Smithsonian Institution. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
324. "Computer History for 1984". Computer Hope. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
325. "Japanese Technical Abstracts". Japanese Technical Abstracts. 2 (3–4). University Microfilms: 161. 1987. The announcement of 1M DRAM in 1984 began the era of megabytes.
326. "KM48SL2000-7 Datasheet". Samsung. August 1992. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
327. "Electronic Design". Electronic Design. 41 (15–21). Hayden Publishing Company. 1993. The first commercial synchronous DRAM, the Samsung 16-Mbit KM48SL2000, employs a single-bank architecture that lets system designers easily transition from asynchronous to synchronous systems.
328. Breaking the gigabit barrier, DRAMs at ISSCC portend major system-design impact. (dynamic random access memory; International Solid-State Circuits Conference; Hitachi Ltd. and NEC Corp. research and development), January 9, 1995
329. "Japanese Company Profiles" (PDF). Smithsonian Institution. 1996. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
330. "History: 1990s". SK Hynix. Archived from the original on February 5, 2021. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
331. "Samsung 50nm 2GB DDR3 chips are industry's smallest". SlashGear. September 29, 2008. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
332. Shilov, Anton (July 19, 2017). "Samsung Increases Production Volumes of 8 GB HBM2 Chips Due to Growing Demand". AnandTech. Archived from the original on July 20, 2017. Retrieved June 29, 2019.
333. "Samsung Unleashes a Roomy DDR4 256GB RAM". Tom's Hardware. September 6, 2018. Archived from the original on June 21, 2019. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
334. "First 3D Nanotube and RRAM ICs Come Out of Foundry". IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News. July 19, 2019. Retrieved September 16, 2019. This wafer was made just last Friday... and it's the first monolithic 3D IC ever fabricated within a foundry
335. "Three Dimensional Monolithic System-on-a-Chip". www.darpa.mil. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
336. "DARPA 3DSoC Initiative Completes First Year, Update Provided at ERI Summit on Key Steps Achieved to Transfer Technology into SkyWater's 200mm U.S. Foundry". Skywater Technology Foundry (Press release). July 25, 2019. Retrieved September 16, 2019.
337. "DD28F032SA Datasheet". Intel. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
338. "TOSHIBA ANNOUNCES 0.13 MICRON 1Gb MONOLITHIC NAND FEATURING LARGE BLOCK SIZE FOR IMPROVED WRITE/ERASE SPEED PERFORMANCE". Toshiba. September 9, 2002. Archived from the original on March 11, 2006. Retrieved March 11, 2006.
339. "TOSHIBA AND SANDISK INTRODUCE A ONE GIGABIT NAND FLASH MEMORY CHIP, DOUBLING CAPACITY OF FUTURE FLASH PRODUCTS". Toshiba. November 12, 2001. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
340. "Our Proud Heritage from 2000 to 2009". Samsung Semiconductor. Samsung. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
341. "TOSHIBA ANNOUNCES 1 GIGABYTE COMPACTFLASH CARD". Toshiba. September 9, 2002. Archived from the original on March 11, 2006. Retrieved March 11, 2006.
342. "History". Samsung Electronics. Samsung. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
343. "TOSHIBA COMMERCIALIZES INDUSTRY'S HIGHEST CAPACITY EMBEDDED NAND FLASH MEMORY FOR MOBILE CONSUMER PRODUCTS". Toshiba. April 17, 2007. Archived from the original on November 23, 2010. Retrieved November 23, 2010.
344. "Toshiba Launches the Largest Density Embedded NAND Flash Memory Devices". Toshiba. August 7, 2008. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
345. "Toshiba Launches Industry's Largest Embedded NAND Flash Memory Modules". Toshiba. June 17, 2010. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
346. "Samsung e·MMC Product family" (PDF). Samsung Electronics. December 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 8, 2019. Retrieved July 15, 2019.
347. Shilov, Anton (December 5, 2017). "Samsung Starts Production of 512 GB UFS NAND Flash Memory: 64-Layer V-NAND, 860 MB/s Reads". AnandTech. Archived from the original on December 5, 2017. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
348. Manners, David (January 30, 2019). "Samsung makes 1TB flash eUFS module". Electronics Weekly. Retrieved June 23, 2019.
349. Tallis, Billy (October 17, 2018). "Samsung Shares SSD Roadmap for QLC NAND And 96-layer 3D NAND". AnandTech. Archived from the original on October 18, 2018. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
350. "Micron's 232 Layer NAND Now Shipping". AnandTech. July 26, 2022. Archived from the original on July 27, 2022.
351. "232-Layer NAND". Micron. Retrieved October 17, 2022.
352. "First to Market, Second to None: the World's First 232-Layer NAND". Micron. July 26, 2022.
353. "Comparison: Latest 3D NAND Products from YMTC, Samsung, SK hynix and Micron". TechInsights. January 11, 2023.
354. Han-Way Huang (December 5, 2008). Embedded System Design with C805. Cengage Learning. p. 22. ISBN 978-1-111-81079-5. Archived from the original on April 27, 2018.
355. Marie-Aude Aufaure; Esteban Zimányi (January 17, 2013). Business Intelligence: Second European Summer School, eBISS 2012, Brussels, Belgium, July 15-21, 2012, Tutorial Lectures. Springer. p. 136. ISBN 978-3-642-36318-4. Archived from the original on April 27, 2018.
356. "1965: Semiconductor Read-Only-Memory Chips Appear". Computer History Museum. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
357. "1971: Reusable semiconductor ROM introduced". The Storage Engine. Computer History Museum. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
358. Iizuka, H.; Masuoka, F.; Sato, Tai; Ishikawa, M. (1976). "Electrically alterable avalanche-injection-type MOS READ-ONLY memory with stacked-gate structure". IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 23 (4): 379–387. Bibcode:1976ITED...23..379I. doi:10.1109/T-ED.1976.18415. ISSN 0018-9383. S2CID 30491074.
359. μCOM-43 SINGLE CHIP MICROCOMPUTER: USERS' MANUAL (PDF). NEC Microcomputers. January 1978. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
360. "2716: 16K (2K x 8) UV ERASABLE PROM" (PDF). Intel. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 13, 2020. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
361. "1982 CATALOG" (PDF). NEC Electronics. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
362. Component Data Catalog (PDF). Intel. 1978. pp. 1–3. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
363. "27256 Datasheet" (PDF). Intel. Retrieved July 2, 2019.
364. "History of Fujitsu's Semiconductor Business". Fujitsu. Retrieved July 2, 2019.
365. "D27512-30 Datasheet" (PDF). Intel. Retrieved July 2, 2019.
366. "A Computer Pioneer Rediscovered, 50 Years On". The New York Times. April 20, 1994. Archived from the original on November 4, 2016.
367. "History of Computers and Computing, Birth of the modern computer, Relays computer, George Stibitz". history-computer.com. Retrieved August 22, 2019. Initially the 'Complex Number Computer' performed only complex multiplication and division, but later a simple modification enabled it to add and subtract as well. It used about 400-450 binary relays, 6-8 panels, and ten multiposition, multipole relays called "crossbars" for temporary storage of numbers.
368. "1953: Transistorized Computers Emerge". Computer History Museum. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
369. "ETL Mark III Transistor-Based Computer". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
370. "Brief History". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
371. "1962: Aerospace systems are first the applications for ICs in computers | The Silicon Engine | Computer History Museum". www.computerhistory.org. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
372. "PDP-8 (Straight 8) Computer Functional Restoration". www.pdp8.net. Retrieved August 22, 2019. backplanes contain 230 cards, approximately 10,148 diodes, 1409 transistors, 5615 resistors, and 1674 capacitors
373. "IBM 608 calculator". IBM. January 23, 2003. Retrieved March 8, 2021.
374. "【NEC】 NEAC-2201". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
375. "【Hitachi and Japanese National Railways】 MARS-1". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
376. The IBM 7070 Data Processing System. Avery et al. (page 167)
377. "【Matsushita Electric Industrial】 MADIC-I transistor-based computer". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
378. "【NEC】 NEAC-2203". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
379. "【Toshiba】 TOSBAC-2100". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
380. 7090 Data Processing System
381. Luigi Logrippo. "My first two computers: Elea 9003 and Elea 6001: Memories of a 'bare-metal' programmer".
382. "【Mitsubishi Electric】 MELCOM 1101". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
383. Erich Bloch (1959). The Engineering Design of the Stretch Computer (PDF). Eastern Joint Computer Conference.
384. "【NEC】NEAC-L2". IPSJ Computer Museum. Information Processing Society of Japan. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
385. Thornton, James (1970). Design of a Computer: the Control Data 6600. p. 20.
386. "Digital Equipment PDP-8/S".
387. "The PDP-8/S - an exercise in cost reduction"
388. "PDP-8/S"
389. "The Digital Equipment Corporation PDP-8: Models and Options: The PDP-8/I".
390. James F. O'Loughlin. "PDP-8/I: bigger on the inside yet smaller on the outside".
391. Jan M. Rabaey, Digital Integrated Circuits, Fall 2001: Course Notes, Chapter 6: Designing Combinatorial Logic Gates in CMOS, retrieved October 27, 2012.
392. Richard F. Tinder (January 2000). Engineering Digital Design. Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-691295-1.
393. Engineers, Institute of Electrical Electronics (2000). 100-2000 (7th ed.). doi:10.1109/IEEESTD.2000.322230. ISBN 978-0-7381-2601-2. IEEE Std 100-2000.
394. Smith, Kevin (August 11, 1983). "Image processor handles 256 pixels simultaneously". Electronics.
395. Kanellos, Michael (February 9, 2005). "Cell chip: Hit or hype?". CNET News. Archived from the original on October 25, 2012.
396. Kennedy, Patrick (June 2019). "Hands-on With a Graphcore C2 IPU PCIe Card at Dell Tech World". servethehome.com. Retrieved December 29, 2019.
397. "Colossus – Graphcore". en.wikichip.org. Retrieved December 29, 2019.
398. Graphcore. "IPU Technology". www.graphcore.ai.
399. "Cerebras Unveils 2nd Gen Wafer Scale Engine: 850,000 Cores, 2.6 Trillion Transistors - ExtremeTech". www.extremetech.com. April 21, 2021. Retrieved April 22, 2021.
400. "Cerebras Wafer Scale Engine WSE-2 and CS-2 at Hot Chips 34". ServeTheHome. August 23, 2022.
401. "NVIDIA NVLink4 NVSwitch at Hot Chips 34". ServeTheHome. August 22, 2022.
402. Schor, David (April 6, 2019). "TSMC Starts 5-Nanometer Risk Production". WikiChip Fuse. Retrieved April 7, 2019.
403. "1960: Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) Transistor Demonstrated". Computer History Museum. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
404. Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 321–3. ISBN 9783540342588.
405. "1963: Complementary MOS Circuit Configuration is Invented". Computer History Museum. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
406. "1964: First Commercial MOS IC Introduced". Computer History Museum. Retrieved July 17, 2019.
407. Lojek, Bo (2007). History of Semiconductor Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 330. ISBN 9783540342588.
408. Lambrechts, Wynand; Sinha, Saurabh; Abdallah, Jassem Ahmed; Prinsloo, Jaco (2018). Extending Moore's Law through Advanced Semiconductor Design and Processing Techniques. CRC Press. p. 59. ISBN 9781351248655.
409. Belzer, Jack; Holzman, Albert G.; Kent, Allen (1978). Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology: Volume 10 – Linear and Matrix Algebra to Microorganisms: Computer-Assisted Identification. CRC Press. p. 402. ISBN 9780824722609.
410. "Intel Microprocessor Quick Reference Guide". Intel. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
411. "1978: Double-well fast CMOS SRAM (Hitachi)" (PDF). Semiconductor History Museum of Japan. Retrieved July 5, 2019.
412. "0.18-micron Technology". TSMC. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
413. 65nm CMOS Process Technology
414. Diefendorff, Keith (15 November 1999). "Hal Makes Sparcs Fly". Microprocessor Report, Volume 13, Number 5.
415. Cutress, Ian. "Intel's 10nm Cannon Lake and Core i3-8121U Deep Dive Review". AnandTech. Archived from the original on January 30, 2019. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
416. "Samsung Shows Industry's First 2-Gigabit DDR2 SDRAM". Samsung Semiconductor. Samsung. September 20, 2004. Retrieved June 25, 2019.
417. Williams, Martyn (July 12, 2004). "Fujitsu, Toshiba begin 65nm chip trial production". InfoWorld. Retrieved June 26, 2019.
418. Elpida's presentation at Via Technology Forum 2005 and Elpida 2005 Annual Report
419. "Fujitsu Introduces World-class 65-Nanometer Process Technology for Advanced Server, Mobile Applications". Archived from the original on September 27, 2011. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
420. "Intel Now Packs 100 Million Transistors in Each Square Millimeter". IEEE Spectrum: Technology, Engineering, and Science News. March 30, 2017. Retrieved November 14, 2018.
421. "40nm Technology". TSMC. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
422. "Toshiba Makes Major Advances in NAND Flash Memory with 3-bit-per-cell 32nm generation and with 4-bit-per-cell 43nm technology". Toshiba. February 11, 2009. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
423. "History: 2010s". SK Hynix. Archived from the original on April 29, 2021. Retrieved July 8, 2019.
424. Shimpi, Anand Lal (June 8, 2012). "SandForce Demos 19nm Toshiba & 20nm IMFT NAND Flash". AnandTech. Archived from the original on June 9, 2012. Retrieved June 19, 2019.
425. Schor, David (April 16, 2019). "TSMC Announces 6-Nanometer Process". WikiChip Fuse. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
426. "16/12nm Technology". TSMC. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
427. "VLSI 2018: Samsung's 8nm 8LPP, a 10nm extension". WikiChip Fuse. July 1, 2018. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
428. "Samsung Mass Producing 128Gb 3-bit MLC NAND Flash". Tom's Hardware. April 11, 2013. Archived from the original on June 21, 2019. Retrieved June 21, 2019.
429. "10nm Technology". TSMC. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
430. "Can TSMC maintain their process technology lead". SemiWiki. April 29, 2020.
431. Jones, Scotten (May 3, 2019). "TSMC and Samsung 5nm Comparison". Semiwiki. Retrieved July 30, 2019.
432. Nenni, Daniel (January 2, 2019). "Samsung vs TSMC 7nm Update". Semiwiki. Retrieved July 6, 2019.
433. "7nm Technology". TSMC. Retrieved June 30, 2019.
434. Schor, David (June 15, 2018). "A Look at Intel's 10nm Std Cell as TechInsights Reports on the i3-8121U, finds Ruthenium". WikiChip Fuse. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
435. "Samsung Foundry update 2019". SemiWiki. August 6, 2019.
436. Jones, Scotten (June 25, 2018), 7nm, 5nm and 3nm Logic, current and projected processes
437. Shilov, Anton. "Samsung Completes Development of 5nm EUV Process Technology". AnandTech. Archived from the original on April 18, 2019. Retrieved May 31, 2019.
438. "Samsung Foundry Innovations Power the Future of Big Data, AI/ML and Smart, Connected Devices". October 7, 2021.
439. "Qualcomm confirms Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is made using Samsung's 4nm process". December 2, 2021.
440. Wilde, Damien (January 14, 2022). "List of Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 smartphones available since December 2021". 9to5Google.
441. "TSMC Extends Its 5nm Family With A New Enhanced-Performance N4P Node". WikiChip. October 26, 2021.
442. "MediaTek Launches Dimensity 9000 built on TSMC N4 process". December 16, 2021.
443. "TSMC Expands Advanced Technology Leadership with N4P Process (press release)". TSMC. October 26, 2021.
444. Armasu, Lucian (January 11, 2019), "Samsung Plans Mass Production of 3nm GAAFET Chips in 2021", www.tomshardware.com
445. "Samsung Starts 3nm Production: The Gate-All-Around (GAAFET) Era Begins". AnandTech. June 30, 2022. Archived from the original on July 2, 2022.
446. "TSMC Plans New Fab for 3nm". EE Times. December 12, 2016. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
447. "TSMC Roadmap Update: 3nm in Q1 2023, 3nm Enhanced in 2024, 2nm in 2025". www.anandtech.com. October 18, 2021. Archived from the original on October 18, 2021.
448. "TSMC Introduces N4X Process (press release)". TSMC. December 16, 2021.
449. "The Future Is Now (blog post)". TSMC. December 16, 2021.
450. "TSMC Unveils N4X Node". AnandTech. December 17, 2021. Archived from the original on May 25, 2022.
451. "TSMC roadmap update". AnandTech. April 22, 2022. Archived from the original on April 25, 2022.
452. Smith, Ryan (June 13, 2022). "Intel 4 Process Node In Detail: 2x Density Scaling, 20% Improved Performance". AnandTech. Archived from the original on June 13, 2022.
453. Alcorn, Paul (March 24, 2021). "Intel Fixes 7nm, Meteor Lake and Granite Rapids Coming in 2023". Tom's Hardware. Retrieved June 1, 2021.
454. Cutress, Dr Ian. "Intel's Process Roadmap to 2025: with 4nm, 3nm, 20A and 18A?!". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on July 26, 2021. Retrieved July 27, 2021.
455. Cutress, Dr Ian (February 17, 2022). "Intel Discloses Multi-Generation Xeon Scalable Roadmap: New E-Core Only Xeons in 2024". www.anandtech.com. Archived from the original on February 17, 2022.
456. "Samsung Electronics Unveils Plans for 1.4nm Process Technology and Investment for Production Capacity at Samsung Foundry Forum 2022". Samsung Global Newsroom. October 4, 2022.
457. Wecker, Dave; Bauer, Bela; Clark, Bryan K.; Hastings, Matthew B.; Troyer, Matthias (2014). "Gate-count estimates for performing quantum chemistry on small quantum computers". Physical Review A. 90 (2) 022305. arXiv:1312.1695. Bibcode:2014PhRvA..90b2305W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.022305.
458. Does gate count matter? Hardware efficiency of logic-minimization techniques for cryptographic primitives
459. Sarmento, Jose; Stonick, John T. (2010). "A minimal-gate-count fully digital frequency-tracking oversampling CDR circuit". Proceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. pp. 2099–2102. doi:10.1109/ISCAS.2010.5537061. ISBN 978-1-4244-5308-5.
460. Ghoniem, Omar; Elsayed, Hatem; Soubra, Hassan (2023). "Quantum Gate Count Analysis". 2023 Eleventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS). pp. 190–197. doi:10.1109/ICICIS58388.2023.10391119. ISBN 979-8-3503-2208-8.

External links

• Transistor counts of Intel processors
• Evolution of FPGA Architecture

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transistor_count&oldid=1321236810"